Literature DB >> 30940920

Reaching an evidence-based prognosis for personalized treatment of multiple sclerosis.

Dalia Rotstein1, Xavier Montalban2,3.   

Abstract

Personalized treatment is ideal for multiple sclerosis (MS) owing to the heterogeneity of clinical features, but current knowledge gaps, including validation of biomarkers and treatment algorithms, limit practical implementation. The contemporary approach to personalized MS therapy depends on evidence-based prognostication, an initial treatment choice and evaluation of early treatment responses to identify the need to switch therapy. Prognostication is directed by baseline clinical, environmental and demographic factors, MRI measures and biomarkers that correlate with long-term disability measures. The initial treatment choice should be a shared decision between the patient and physician. In addition to prognosis, this choice must account for patient-related factors, including comorbidities, pregnancy planning, preferences of the patients and their comfort with risk, and drug-related factors, including safety, cost and implications for treatment sequencing. Treatment response has traditionally been assessed on the basis of relapse rate, MRI lesions and disability progression. Larger longitudinal data sets have enabled development of composite outcome measures and more stringent standards for disease control. Biomarkers, including neurofilament light chain, have potential as early surrogate markers of prognosis and treatment response but require further validation. Overall, attainment of personalized treatment for MS is complex but will be refined as new data become available.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30940920     DOI: 10.1038/s41582-019-0170-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol        ISSN: 1759-4758            Impact factor:   42.937


  35 in total

1.  The use of Modified Rio score for determining treatment failure in patients with multiple sclerosis: retrospective descriptive case series study.

Authors:  Mesude Tutuncu; Ayse Altintas; Burcu V Dogan; Ugur Uygunoglu; Nilufer Kale Icen; Ayse Deniz Elmalı; Eda Coban; Bengi G Alpaslan; Aysun Soysal
Journal:  Acta Neurol Belg       Date:  2020-08-31       Impact factor: 2.396

2.  The no evidence of disease activity (NEDA) concept in MS: impact of spinal cord MRI.

Authors:  Elena Di Sabatino; Lorenzo Gaetani; Silvia Sperandei; Andrea Fiacca; Giorgio Guercini; Lucilla Parnetti; Massimiliano Di Filippo
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2021-11-24       Impact factor: 4.849

3.  d-mannose suppresses oxidative response and blocks phagocytosis in experimental neuroinflammation.

Authors:  Jing Wang; Negin Jalali Motlagh; Cuihua Wang; Gregory R Wojtkiewicz; Stephan Schmidt; Cindy Chau; Radha Narsimhan; Enrico G Kullenberg; Cindy Zhu; Jenny Linnoila; Zhenwei Yao; John W Chen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-11-02       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  Ocrelizumab for multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Mengbing Lin; Jian Zhang; Yueling Zhang; Jiefeng Luo; Shengliang Shi
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2022-05-18

5.  CSF TNF and osteopontin levels correlate with the response to dimethyl fumarate in early multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Damiano Marastoni; Anna I Pisani; Gianmarco Schiavi; Valentina Mazziotti; Marco Castellaro; Agnese Tamanti; Francesca Bosello; Francesco Crescenzo; Giuseppe K Ricciardi; Stefania Montemezzi; Francesca B Pizzini; Massimiliano Calabrese
Journal:  Ther Adv Neurol Disord       Date:  2022-06-21       Impact factor: 6.430

6.  Immunotherapy for people with clinically isolated syndrome or relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: treatment response by demographic, clinical, and biomarker subgroups (PROMISE)-a systematic review protocol.

Authors:  Thomas Lehnert; Christian Röver; Sascha Köpke; Jordi Rio; Declan Chard; Andrea V Fittipaldo; Tim Friede; Christoph Heesen; Anne C Rahn
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2022-07-01

7.  Long-term disability trajectories in relapsing multiple sclerosis patients treated with early intensive or escalation treatment strategies.

Authors:  Pietro Iaffaldano; Giuseppe Lucisano; Francesca Caputo; Damiano Paolicelli; Francesco Patti; Mauro Zaffaroni; Vincenzo Brescia Morra; Carlo Pozzilli; Giovanna De Luca; Matilde Inglese; Giuseppe Salemi; Giorgia Teresa Maniscalco; Eleonora Cocco; Patrizia Sola; Giacomo Lus; Antonella Conte; Maria Pia Amato; Franco Granella; Claudio Gasperini; Paolo Bellantonio; Rocco Totaro; Marco Rovaris; Marco Salvetti; Valentina Liliana Adriana Torri Clerici; Roberto Bergamaschi; Davide Maimone; Elio Scarpini; Marco Capobianco; Giancarlo Comi; Massimo Filippi; Maria Trojano
Journal:  Ther Adv Neurol Disord       Date:  2021-05-31       Impact factor: 6.570

8.  Quantitative signal properties from standardized MRIs correlate with multiple sclerosis disability.

Authors:  Tammie L S Benzinger; Robert T Naismith; Matthew R Brier; Abraham Z Snyder; Aaron Tanenbaum; Richard A Rudick; Elizabeth Fisher; Stephen Jones; Joshua S Shimony; Anne H Cross
Journal:  Ann Clin Transl Neurol       Date:  2021-05-04       Impact factor: 4.511

Review 9.  B and T Cells Driving Multiple Sclerosis: Identity, Mechanisms and Potential Triggers.

Authors:  Jamie van Langelaar; Liza Rijvers; Joost Smolders; Marvin M van Luijn
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2020-05-08       Impact factor: 7.561

10.  Harnessing Real-World Data to Inform Decision-Making: Multiple Sclerosis Partners Advancing Technology and Health Solutions (MS PATHS).

Authors:  Ellen M Mowry; Robert A Bermel; James R Williams; Tammie L S Benzinger; Carl de Moor; Elizabeth Fisher; Carrie M Hersh; Megan H Hyland; Izlem Izbudak; Stephen E Jones; Bernd C Kieseier; Hagen H Kitzler; Lauren Krupp; Yvonne W Lui; Xavier Montalban; Robert T Naismith; Jacqueline A Nicholas; Fabio Pellegrini; Alex Rovira; Maximilian Schulze; Björn Tackenberg; Mar Tintore; Madalina E Tivarus; Tjalf Ziemssen; Richard A Rudick
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2020-08-07       Impact factor: 4.003

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.