| Literature DB >> 30940614 |
Jérôme Hadjadj1,2, Nathalie Aladjidi3,4, Helder Fernandes3,4, Guy Leverger5, Aude Magérus-Chatinet1,2, Fabienne Mazerolles1,2, Marie-Claude Stolzenberg1,2, Sidonie Jacques1,2, Capucine Picard2,6, Jérémie Rosain2,6, Cécile Fourrage7,8, Sylvain Hanein9, Mohammed Zarhrate8,10, Marlène Pasquet11, Wadih Abou Chahla12, Vincent Barlogis13, Yves Bertrand14, Isabelle Pellier15, Elodie Colomb Bottollier16, Fanny Fouyssac17, Pascale Blouin18, Caroline Thomas19, Nathalie Cheikh20, Eric Dore21, Corinne Pondarre22,23, Dominique Plantaz24, Eric Jeziorski25, Frédéric Millot26, Nicolas Garcelon2,27, Stéphane Ducassou3,4, Yves Perel3,4, Thierry Leblanc28, Bénédicte Neven1,2,29, Alain Fischer2,29,30,31, Frédéric Rieux-Laucat1,2.
Abstract
Evans syndrome (ES) is a rare severe autoimmune disorder characterized by the combination of autoimmune hemolytic anemia and immune thrombocytopenia. In most cases, the underlying cause is unknown. We sought to identify genetic defects in pediatric ES (pES), based on a hypothesis of strong genetic determinism. In a national, prospective cohort of 203 patients with early-onset ES (median [range] age at last follow-up: 16.3 years ([1.2-41.0 years]) initiated in 2004, 80 nonselected consecutive individuals underwent genetic testing. The clinical data were analyzed as a function of the genetic findings. Fifty-two patients (65%) received a genetic diagnosis (the M+ group): 49 carried germline mutations and 3 carried somatic variants. Thirty-two (40%) had pathogenic mutations in 1 of 9 genes known to be involved in primary immunodeficiencies (TNFRSF6, CTLA4, STAT3, PIK3CD, CBL, ADAR1, LRBA, RAG1, and KRAS), whereas 20 patients (25%) carried probable pathogenic variants in 16 genes that had not previously been reported in the context of autoimmune disease. Lastly, no genetic abnormalities were found in the remaining 28 patients (35%, the M- group). The M+ group displayed more severe disease than the M- group, with a greater frequency of additional immunopathologic manifestations and a greater median number of lines of treatment. Six patients (all from the M+ group) died during the study. In conclusion, pES was potentially genetically determined in at least 65% of cases. Systematic, wide-ranging genetic screening should be offered in pES; the genetic findings have prognostic significance and may guide the choice of a targeted treatment.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30940614 DOI: 10.1182/blood-2018-11-887141
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Blood ISSN: 0006-4971 Impact factor: 22.113