Literature DB >> 30940530

Change in Patterns of Failure After Image-Guided Brachytherapy for Cervical Cancer: Analysis From the RetroEMBRACE Study.

Li-Tee Tan1, Richard Pötter2, Alina Sturdza3, Lars Fokdal4, Christine Haie-Meder5, Maximilian Schmid2, Deborah Gregory1, Primoz Petric6, Ina Jürgenliemk-Schulz7, Charles Gillham8, Eric Van Limbergen9, Peter Hoskin10, Ekkasit Tharavichitkul11, Elena Villafranca12, Umesh Mahantshetty13, Christian Kirisits2, Jacob Lindegaard4, Kathrin Kirchheiner2, Kari Tanderup4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Image guided adaptive brachytherapy (IGABT) for cervical cancer improves pelvic control and survival across all stages. Improvement in pelvic control is larger in advanced stages, but improvement in survival is similar across stages. This paper analyzes the patterns of failure in the RetroEMBRACE cohort to investigate this discrepancy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: 731 patients from 12 institutions treated with chemoradiation therapy and magnetic resonance imaging or computed tomography-based IGABT were evaluated. The pattern of failure at time of first relapse was analyzed.
RESULTS: Three hundred twenty-five failures (single and synchronous) occurred in 222 of 731 patients (30%). Among the 325 failures, 9% were local and 6% regional. Pelvic (local or regional) failures made up 13%, paraaortic node (PAN) 9%, systemic 21%, and distant (systemic + PAN) 24%. Of the 222 patients with treatment failure, 21% had pelvic failure alone, 57% had distant failure alone, and 23% had both pelvic and distant failure. Of all failures that occurred, 40% to 50% occurred in the first year, with a further 20% to 30% occurring in the second year. Although local, regional, and PAN failure tended to plateau after year 3, systemic failure continued to occur up to year 10.
CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of IGABT has changed the patterns of relapse after chemoradiation therapy for cervical cancer. The predominant failure after IGABT is systemic, whereas the predominant failure with conventional brachytherapy is pelvic. Effective treatments to eradicate micrometastases in PAN and distant organs are needed in addition to IGABT and chemoradiation therapy to maximize local, regional, PAN, and systemic control and improve survival.
Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30940530     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2019.03.038

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  19 in total

1.  Toripalimab combined with concurrent platinum-based Chemoradiotherapy in patients with locally advanced cervical Cancer: an open-label, single-arm, phase II trial.

Authors:  Jie Chen; Chen Li; Yuanjie Cao; Li Zhu; Bailin Zhang; Jinqiang You; Hailing Hou; Jing Wang; Zhiyong Yuan
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2022-07-19       Impact factor: 4.638

2.  Radiation Therapy for Cervical Cancer: Executive Summary of an ASTRO Clinical Practice Guideline.

Authors:  Junzo Chino; Christina M Annunziata; Sushil Beriwal; Lisa Bradfield; Beth A Erickson; Emma C Fields; KathrynJane Fitch; Matthew M Harkenrider; Christine H Holschneider; Mitchell Kamrava; Eric Leung; Lilie L Lin; Jyoti S Mayadev; Marc Morcos; Chika Nwachukwu; Daniel Petereit; Akila N Viswanathan
Journal:  Pract Radiat Oncol       Date:  2020-05-18

Review 3.  Implications of the new FIGO staging and the role of imaging in cervical cancer.

Authors:  Aki Kido; Yuji Nakamoto
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2021-05-14       Impact factor: 3.629

4.  Impact of suboptimal dosimetric coverage of pretherapeutic 18F-FDG PET/CT hotspots on outcome in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer treated with chemoradiotherapy followed by brachytherapy.

Authors:  François Lucia; Vincent Bourbonne; Dorothy Gujral; Gurvan Dissaux; Omar Miranda; Maelle Mauguen; Olivier Pradier; Ronan Abgral; Ulrike Schick
Journal:  Clin Transl Radiat Oncol       Date:  2020-05-11

5.  The Impact of High-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy: Measuring Clinical Outcomes in the Primary Treatment of Cervical Cancer.

Authors:  Jiheon Song; Najlaa Alyamani; Gaurav Bhattacharya; Tien Le; Choan E; Rajiv Samant
Journal:  Adv Radiat Oncol       Date:  2020-02-28

6.  Patterns of definitive radiotherapy practice for cervical cancer in South Korea: a survey endorsed by the Korean Radiation Oncology Group (KROG 20-06).

Authors:  Nalee Kim; Won Park
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2021-05       Impact factor: 4.401

7.  Hybrid tandem and ovoids brachytherapy in locally advanced cervical cancer: impact of dose and tumor volume metrics on outcomes.

Authors:  Amanda Rivera; Monica Wassel; Patrik N Brodin; Ravindra Yaparpalvi; Christian Velten; Rafi Kabarriti; Madhur Garg; Shalom Kalnicki; Keyur J Mehta
Journal:  J Contemp Brachytherapy       Date:  2021-04-14

8.  Muscle Loss after Chemoradiotherapy as a Biomarker of Distant Failures in Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer.

Authors:  Jie Lee; Jhen-Bin Lin; Meng-Hao Wu; Chih-Long Chang; Ya-Ting Jan; Yu-Jen Chen
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2020-03-05       Impact factor: 6.639

9.  High precision radiotherapy including intensity-modulated radiation therapy and pulsed-dose-rate brachytherapy for cervical cancer: a retrospective monoinstitutional study.

Authors:  Andrea Vavassori; Giulia Riva; Ruggero Spoto; Roberta Lazzari; Cristiana Fodor; Samantha Dicuonzo; Claudia Maria Francia; Matteo Augugliaro; Giuseppe Facondo; Raffaella Cambria; Stefania Comi; Federica Cattani; Francesca Botta; Vincenzo Bagnardi; Stefania Rizzo; Nicoletta Colombo; Roberto Orecchia; Barbara Alicja Jereczek-Fossa
Journal:  J Contemp Brachytherapy       Date:  2019-12-08

10.  Radiomics Analysis of 3D Dose Distributions to Predict Toxicity of Radiotherapy for Cervical Cancer.

Authors:  François Lucia; Vincent Bourbonne; Dimitris Visvikis; Omar Miranda; Dorothy M Gujral; Dominique Gouders; Gurvan Dissaux; Olivier Pradier; Florent Tixier; Vincent Jaouen; Julien Bert; Mathieu Hatt; Ulrike Schick
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2021-05-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.