Jeroen Luyten1, Luk Bruyneel2, Albert Jan van Hoek3. 1. Leuven Institute for Healthcare Policy, KU Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer 35, 3000 Leuven, Belgium. Electronic address: jeroen.luyten@kuleuven.be. 2. Leuven Institute for Healthcare Policy, KU Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer 35, 3000 Leuven, Belgium. 3. Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London WC1E 7HT, United Kingdom; Centre for Infectious Diseases, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Antonie van Leeuwenhoeklaan 9, 3721 MA Bilthoven, the Netherlands.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In many regions of the world, vaccine hesitancy has become an important concern to public health. A key part of any effective solution to it is to gain an in-depth understanding of the problem: its scope, who holds hesitant views and for which reasons. METHODS: We adapt the original 10-item Vaccine Hesitancy Scale (VHS), which targets parental attitudes, to a more generic version that captures general attitudes to vaccination. We use this adapted VHS in a sample of 1402 British citizens, selected from a large online panel (N > 1,000,000) based on quota for age, gender, educational attainment and region (response rate 43%). The existence of VHS subscales is evaluated via exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. We describe the extent of vaccine hesitancy in the sample, and use simple and multiple regression analysis to examine associations between respondent characteristics and vaccine hesitancy. RESULTS: Despite ambiguities in defining hesitancy, we found that a substantial part of our sample held hesitant views about vaccination, particularly for those items reflecting aversion to risks of side effects. Four percent responded in a hesitant way to all ten items and ninety to at least one of the ten items. In line with recent studies in other populations, we identified two subscales within the VHS: lack of confidence in the need for vaccines and aversion to the risk of side effects. We found significant associations between hesitancy and various respondent characteristics but the predictive power of these associations remained limited. CONCLUSION: Our study suggests that whereas a substantial percentage of the British population is vaccine hesitant, these views are not clustered in typical demographic features. The small but important adaptation of the VHS to target general attitudes seems to result in highly similar psychometric characteristics as the original scale that exclusively targets parents. We provide suggestions for further validation of the VHS.
BACKGROUND: In many regions of the world, vaccine hesitancy has become an important concern to public health. A key part of any effective solution to it is to gain an in-depth understanding of the problem: its scope, who holds hesitant views and for which reasons. METHODS: We adapt the original 10-item Vaccine Hesitancy Scale (VHS), which targets parental attitudes, to a more generic version that captures general attitudes to vaccination. We use this adapted VHS in a sample of 1402 British citizens, selected from a large online panel (N > 1,000,000) based on quota for age, gender, educational attainment and region (response rate 43%). The existence of VHS subscales is evaluated via exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. We describe the extent of vaccine hesitancy in the sample, and use simple and multiple regression analysis to examine associations between respondent characteristics and vaccine hesitancy. RESULTS: Despite ambiguities in defining hesitancy, we found that a substantial part of our sample held hesitant views about vaccination, particularly for those items reflecting aversion to risks of side effects. Four percent responded in a hesitant way to all ten items and ninety to at least one of the ten items. In line with recent studies in other populations, we identified two subscales within the VHS: lack of confidence in the need for vaccines and aversion to the risk of side effects. We found significant associations between hesitancy and various respondent characteristics but the predictive power of these associations remained limited. CONCLUSION: Our study suggests that whereas a substantial percentage of the British population is vaccine hesitant, these views are not clustered in typical demographic features. The small but important adaptation of the VHS to target general attitudes seems to result in highly similar psychometric characteristics as the original scale that exclusively targets parents. We provide suggestions for further validation of the VHS.
Authors: Dominika Ochnik; Aleksandra M Rogowska; Ana Arzenšek; Joy Benatov Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-06-12 Impact factor: 4.614
Authors: Peter G Szilagyi; Christina S Albertin; Dennis Gurfinkel; Alison W Saville; Sitaram Vangala; John D Rice; Laura Helmkamp; Gregory D Zimet; Rebecca Valderrama; Abigail Breck; Cynthia M Rand; Sharon G Humiston; Allison Kempe Journal: Vaccine Date: 2020-08-02 Impact factor: 4.169
Authors: Anna Soveri; Linda C Karlsson; Otto Mäki; Jan Antfolk; Otto Waris; Hasse Karlsson; Linnea Karlsson; Mikael Lindfelt; Stephan Lewandowsky Journal: PLoS One Date: 2020-07-27 Impact factor: 3.240