| Literature DB >> 30940142 |
Antônio Ralph Medeiros-Sousa1, Rafael de Oliveira Christe2, Ana Maria Ribeiro de Castro Duarte3, Luis Filipe Mucci3, Walter Ceretti-Junior4, Mauro Toledo Marrelli4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The mosquito Anopheles (Kerteszia) cruzii is the main vector of human and simian malaria in the Atlantic Forest. This species is usually abundant in the forests where it occurs, preferring to live and feed on canopies, behaviour known as acrodendrophily. However, in several studies and locations this species has been observed in high density near the ground in the forest. In this study, it was hypothesized that factors associated with anthropogenic landscape changes may be responsible for the variation in abundance and acrodendrophily observed in An. cruzii.Entities:
Keywords: Acrodendrophily; Anopheles (Kerteszia) cruzii; Atlantic Forest; Landscape
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30940142 PMCID: PMC6444577 DOI: 10.1186/s12936-019-2744-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Malar J ISSN: 1475-2875 Impact factor: 2.979
Fig. 1Study sites in the Capivari-Monos EPA, São Paulo, Brazil: (1) Embura village, (2) Marsilac village, (3) Transition zone, (4) Cachoeira do Marsilac and (5) Evangelista de Souza. The areas were classified according to the map of Atlantic Forest biome remnants in the municipality of São Paulo (available at http://geosampa.prefeitura.sp.gov.br/PaginasPublicas/_SBC.aspx). Green represents dense ombrophilous forest; blue represents heterogeneous forest; pink, natural fields; and white, areas where there is human activity (roads, rural properties or villages). Crosses inside the circles indicate collection points. The inner circle represents a 500 m buffer and the dashed circle a 1 km buffer around the collection points. The map was created using QGIS v2.18.9 (http://www.qgis.org)
Fig. 2Collection techniques used in the study: a CDC trap installed near the ground; b CDC trap installed in the canopy of a tree; and c Shannon trap. Images: Laboratory for Entomology in Public Health, University of São Paulo (LESP/FSP/USP)
Landscape metrics for each of the five sites in the Capivari-Monos EPA
| Site | Proportion of forest cover | Proportion of anthropogenic use | Number of forest fragments | Total edge length (km) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 km buffer | Embura village | 0.617 | 0.375 | 7 | 26.627 |
| Marsilac village | 0.634 | 0.366 | 13 | 25.516 | |
| Transition zone | 0.709 | 0.291 | 12 | 27.948 | |
| Cachoeira do Marsilac | 0.920 | 0.064 | 1 | 17.375 | |
| Evangelista de Souza | 0.915 | 0.080 | 7 | 20.545 | |
| 500 m buffer | Embura village | 0.596 | 0.404 | 4 | 7.515 |
| Marsilac village | 0.532 | 0.468 | 6 | 7.644 | |
| Transition zone | 0.531 | 0.469 | 5 | 5.940 | |
| Cachoeira do Marsilac | 0.883 | 0.117 | 1 | 6.208 | |
| Evangelista de Souza | 0.988 | 0.011 | 3 | 4.534 |
The data were obtained for 500 m and 1 km buffers around the collection sites
Results of mosquito collections at each site: total number of specimens, total number of Anopheles cruzii, relative abundance of An. cruzii, mean abundance of An. cruzii per human/hour in Shannon traps and mean proportion of An. cruzii collected at ground level in CDC traps
| Site | Total no. individuals | Total no. of | Relative abundance of | Mean abundance of | Mean proportion of |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Embura village | 4959 | 270 | 0.05 | 0.5 (0.3–0.8) | 0.58 (0.43–0.72) |
| Marsilac village | 2808 | 841 | 0.30 | 7.25 (2–12) | 0.24 (0.18–0.30) |
| Transition zone | 4577 | 2049 | 0.45 | 22 (9–34) | 0.47 (0.40–0.53) |
| Cachoeira do Marsilac | 5638 | 3913 | 0.69 | 42.5 (8–77) | 0.22 (0.19–0.26) |
| Evangelista de Souza | 5893 | 4377 | 0.74 | 57.5 (34–137) | 0.18 (0.13–0.24) |
Numbers in parentheses correspond to the 95% confidence interval for the mean. Collections in Marsilac village, the transition zone and Cachoeira do Marsilac were performed from March 2015 to April 2017, while collections in Embura village were performed between May 2009 and June 2010 and between March 2015 and April of 2017. Collections in Evangelista de Souza were carried out from May 2009 to June 2010
Fig. 3Observed values (points) and predicted values (lines) for abundance of Anopheles cruzii per human/hour as a function of the proportion of forest cover within a 1 km buffer of each site. The black line represents the average prediction of the model for the fixed effect. The colored lines represent the variations in the intercept due to random effects (collection month and year)
Models proposed to predict the effect of landscape variations on Anopheles cruzii abundance (mean number of mosquitoes collected per human/hour) and acrodendrophily (measured as the proportion of mosquitoes collected at ground level)
| Response variable | Explanatory variable | Fixed effect | Random effect (standard deviation of the random-effect intercepts) | AICc | ∆AICc | Weight | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intercept | Slope | Month | Year | |||||
| Mean |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
| Total edge 500 m | 7.786 (0.583) | − 0.899 (0.046) | 1.182 | 0.879 | 1398.1 | 6.6 | 0.036 | |
| Anthropogenic use 1 km | 3.487 (0.465) | − 5.225 (0.232) | 1.037 | 0.785 | 1403.2 | 11.7 | 0.003 | |
| Anthropogenic use 500 m | 3.395 (0.433) | − 3.774 (0.173) | 1.022 | 0.699 | 1465.3 | 73.8 | < 0.001 | |
| Forest cover 500 m | − 0.379 (0.457) | 3.775 (0173) | 1.022 | 0.700 | 1465.4 | 73.9 | < 0.001 | |
| Total edge 1 km | 5.695 (0.499) | − 0.139 (0.007) | 0.995 | 0.847 | 1599.9 | 208.5 | < 0.001 | |
| Forest fragments 500 m | 3.589 (0.486) | − 0.302 (0.016) | 0.994 | 0.866 | 1627.9 | 236.4 | < 0.001 | |
| Forest fragments 1 km | 3.326 (0.482) | − 0.101 (0.006) | 0.979 | 0.863 | 1749.2 | 357.8 | < 0.001 | |
| Null model | 2.645 (0.497) | – | 1.002 | 0.898 | 2055.2 | 663.7 | < 0.001 | |
| Proportion of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Forest cover 1 km | 2.552 (1.389) | − 5.371 (1.045) | 2.322 | 1.873 | 331.0 | 5.9 | 0.047 | |
| Anthropogenic use 500 m | − 2.651 (1.138) | 3.710 (0.740) | 2.308 | 1.985 | 332.4 | 7.3 | 0.024 | |
| Forest cover 500 m | 1.057 (1.269) | − 3.709 (0.741) | 2.308 | 1.984 | 332.4 | 7.3 | 0.023 | |
| Anthropogenic use 1 km | − 2.721 (1.102) | 5.033 (1.008) | 2.321 | 1.866 | 332.7 | 7.6 | 0.020 | |
| Total edge 1 km | − 4.412 (1.242) | 0.115 (0.029) | 2.266 | 1.801 | 343.6 | 18.5 | < 0.001 | |
| Forest fragments 500 m | − 2.398 (1.069) | 0.161 (0.073) | 2.236 | 1.794 | 354.1 | 28.9 | < 0.001 | |
| Null model | − 1.940 (1.037) | – | 2.173 | 1.795 | 356.6 | 31.5 | < 0.001 | |
| Forest fragments 1 km | − 2.139 (1.053) | 0.034 (0.028) | 2.200 | 1.787 | 357.4 | 32.3 | < 0.001 | |
The values of the models with the best fit are shown in italics
Landscape variables were measured for 500 m and 1 km buffers around the collection point. For each model the intercept and slope for the fixed effect, the standard deviation of the random-effect intercepts, the Akaike information criterion for small samples (AICc and ΔAICc) and Akaike weight are shown. The standard error of estimates is shown in brackets
Fig. 4Observed values (points) and predicted values (lines) for proportion of Anopheles cruzii in CDC traps at ground level as a function of the total edge length in kilometers within a 500 m buffer around each site. The black line represents the average prediction of the model for the fixed effect. The colored lines represent the variations in the intercept due to random effects (collection month and year)