| Literature DB >> 30939963 |
Ying-Jun Chen1, Hao-Hsin Chang1, Shih-Han Lin1, Tzi-Yang Lin1, Ting-Han Wu1, Hsin-Ju Lin1, Nan-Fu Liou1, Chi-Jen Yang1, Yuh-Tarng Chen1, Kai Hsiang Chang1, Cen-You Li1, Ya-Hui Chou1,2.
Abstract
Several large or mid-scale collections of Drosophila enhancer traps have been recently created to allow for genetic swapping of GAL4 coding sequences to versatile transcription activators or suppressors such as LexA, QF, split-GAL4 (GAL4-AD and GAL4-DBD), GAL80 and QS. Yet a systematic analysis of the feasibility and reproducibility of these tools is lacking. Here we focused on InSITE GAL4 drivers that specifically label different subpopulations of olfactory neurons, particularly local interneurons (LNs), and genetically swapped the GAL4 domain for LexA, GAL80 or QF at the same locus. We found that the major utility-limiting factor for these genetic swaps is that many do not fully reproduce the original GAL4 expression patterns. Different donors exhibit distinct efficacies for reproducing original GAL4 expression patterns. The successfully swapped lines reported here will serve as valuable reagents and expand the genetic toolkits of Drosophila olfactory circuit research.Entities:
Keywords: GAL4; GAL80; Genetic swapping; InSITE; LexA; QF; interneuron; olfactory system
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30939963 DOI: 10.1080/01677063.2018.1564289
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Neurogenet ISSN: 0167-7063 Impact factor: 1.250