Literature DB >> 30938897

Cryoballoon ablation for persistent atrial fibrillation in patients without left atrial fibrosis.

Michael Gramlich1,2, Carole Maleck2, Jonathan Marquardt1, Martin Duckheim2, Fabian Stimpfle2, David Heinzmann2, Christian Scheckenbach2, Meinrad Gawaz2, Jürgen Schreieck2, Peter Seizer2.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The role of cryoballoon (CB) pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) for patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) is controversial, since long-term success can be poor. We performed left atrial voltage mapping before CB PVI and determined AF-free survival depending on the extent of low-voltage areas (LVAs). METHODS AND
RESULTS: We consecutively enrolled 60 patients with persistent AF (average age, 60.6 ± 12.9 years; CHA2 DS 2 VASc score, 2.3 ± 1.6; and left atrial size 46.0 ± 5.2 mm) who were planned for CB PVI. Before ablation, we performed left atrial voltage mapping (Abbott EnSite Precision or Velocity). LVAs were defined if local bipolar signal amplitudes were less than 0.5 mV during sinus rhythm. Thirty-seven patients did not show significant LVAs (<10%), while 12 patients had LVAs between 10% and 30% and 11 patients showed substantial LVAs greater than 30% of the left atrial area. CB PVI could be successfully performed in all patients. A 7-day holter monitoring was obtained 3, 6, and 12 months after ablation. After a 12-month follow-up time, 83.8% of patients without LVAs (<10%) were free of atrial fibrillation, while 50.0% of patients with 10% to 30% LVAs and 9.1% of patients with LVAs more than 30% had stable sinus rhythm. The degree of atrial fibrosis correlated with the risk of AF recurrence.
CONCLUSION: In patients with persistent AF undergoing CB PVI, the extent of left atrial LVAs predicts an AF-free survival. CB PVI seems to be a highly effective treatment for patients with persistent AF without atrial fibrosis.
© 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  atrial fibrillation; cryoballoon; electrophysiology; fibrosis; outcome

Year:  2019        PMID: 30938897     DOI: 10.1111/jce.13936

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol        ISSN: 1045-3873


  4 in total

Review 1.  Women and atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Annabelle Santos Volgman; Emelia J Benjamin; Anne B Curtis; Margaret C Fang; Kathryn J Lindley; Gerald V Naccarelli; Carl J Pepine; Odayme Quesada; Marmar Vaseghi; Albert L Waldo; Nanette K Wenger; Andrea M Russo
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol       Date:  2020-12-29       Impact factor: 2.942

2.  Conversion of atrial fibrillation to sinus rhythm during cryoballoon ablation: A favorable and not unusual phenomenon during second-generation cryoballoon pulmonary vein isolation.

Authors:  Riccardo Maj; Gianluca Borio; Thiago G Osório; Saverio Iacopino; Erwin Ströker; Juan Sieira; Muryo Terasawa; Alessandro Rizzo; Oriana Scala; Alessio Galli; Varnavas Varnavas; Gaetano Paparella; Lucio Capulzini; Pedro Brugada; Carlo De Asmundis; Gian B Chierchia
Journal:  J Arrhythm       Date:  2020-01-16

3.  NT-proANP levels in peripheral and cardiac circulation.

Authors:  Petra Büttner; Timm Seewöster; Danilo Obradovic; Gerhard Hindricks; Holger Thiele; Jelena Kornej
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2021-06-25       Impact factor: 1.900

4.  Effectiveness of Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation Using Ablation Index Versus Second Generation Cryoballoon in the Treatment of Persistent Atrial Fibrillation: A Matching-Adjusted Indirect Comparison.

Authors:  Ahmed Hussein; Giuseppe Stabile; Kaitlyn Dawkins; Paul Spin; Laura Goldstein; Tom Wei; Maria Velleca; Leena Patel; Dhiraj Gupta
Journal:  Adv Ther       Date:  2021-07-12       Impact factor: 3.845

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.