Jon E Grant1, Stephanie Valle1, Elizabeth Cavic1, Sarah A Redden1, Samuel R Chamberlain2. 1. Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neuroscience, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois. 2. Department of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge; Cambridge and Peterborough NHS Foundation Trust (CPFT), UK.
Abstract
BACKGROUND:Binge-eating disorder (BED) is associated with impaired quality of life and has a number of untoward public health associations. There are few established pharmacological treatments for BED, and available options are not suitable for all individuals. Vortioxetine is a recently developed pharmacological agent with effects on the serotonergic but also other neurochemical systems, which has yet to be evaluated in this context. METHOD:Eighty adults with BED were recruited for a double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Participants received 12-week treatment with vortioxetine (10 mg/day for 1 week, then increasing to 20 mg/day) or placebo in a parallel design. The primary efficacy outcome measures were binge-eating frequency and weight. Safety data were collected. Effects of active versus placebo treatment were characterized using linear repeated measures models. RESULTS: Both vortioxetine and placebo treatment were associated with significant reductions in binge-eating frequency. Vortioxetine did not differentiate significantly from placebo on any efficacy measure. Frequency of adverse events did not differ between groups. DISCUSSION: Vortioxetine was not more effective than placebo in the treatment of BED. The ability to detect pharmacological treatment benefit may have been hindered by the relatively high placebo response and drop out. Future work should seek to better understand and predict placebo response in BED, with a view to more targeted treatment interventions and, potentially, sample enrichment.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND:Binge-eating disorder (BED) is associated with impaired quality of life and has a number of untoward public health associations. There are few established pharmacological treatments for BED, and available options are not suitable for all individuals. Vortioxetine is a recently developed pharmacological agent with effects on the serotonergic but also other neurochemical systems, which has yet to be evaluated in this context. METHOD: Eighty adults with BED were recruited for a double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Participants received 12-week treatment with vortioxetine (10 mg/day for 1 week, then increasing to 20 mg/day) or placebo in a parallel design. The primary efficacy outcome measures were binge-eating frequency and weight. Safety data were collected. Effects of active versus placebo treatment were characterized using linear repeated measures models. RESULTS: Both vortioxetine and placebo treatment were associated with significant reductions in binge-eating frequency. Vortioxetine did not differentiate significantly from placebo on any efficacy measure. Frequency of adverse events did not differ between groups. DISCUSSION: Vortioxetine was not more effective than placebo in the treatment of BED. The ability to detect pharmacological treatment benefit may have been hindered by the relatively high placebo response and drop out. Future work should seek to better understand and predict placebo response in BED, with a view to more targeted treatment interventions and, potentially, sample enrichment.
Authors: Susan L McElroy; James I Hudson; Julie A Capece; Karen Beyers; Alan C Fisher; Norman R Rosenthal Journal: Biol Psychiatry Date: 2007-01-29 Impact factor: 13.382
Authors: Steven C Leiser; Yan Li; Alan L Pehrson; Elena Dale; Gennady Smagin; Connie Sanchez Journal: ACS Chem Neurosci Date: 2015-03-16 Impact factor: 4.418
Authors: Thomas J Blom; Carolyn J Mingione; Anna I Guerdjikova; Paul E Keck; Jeffrey A Welge; Susan L McElroy Journal: Eur Eat Disord Rev Date: 2014-01-08
Authors: Kelly Posner; Gregory K Brown; Barbara Stanley; David A Brent; Kseniya V Yershova; Maria A Oquendo; Glenn W Currier; Glenn A Melvin; Laurence Greenhill; Sa Shen; J John Mann Journal: Am J Psychiatry Date: 2011-12 Impact factor: 18.112
Authors: Caroline A Davis; Robert D Levitan; Caroline Reid; Jacqueline C Carter; Allan S Kaplan; Karen A Patte; Nicole King; Claire Curtis; James L Kennedy Journal: Obesity (Silver Spring) Date: 2009-03-12 Impact factor: 5.002
Authors: H Ziauddeen; S R Chamberlain; P J Nathan; A Koch; K Maltby; M Bush; W X Tao; A Napolitano; A L Skeggs; A C Brooke; L Cheke; N S Clayton; I Sadaf Farooqi; S O'Rahilly; D Waterworth; K Song; L Hosking; D B Richards; P C Fletcher; E T Bullmore Journal: Mol Psychiatry Date: 2012-11-13 Impact factor: 15.992
Authors: Atul R Mahableshwarkar; John Zajecka; William Jacobson; Yinzhong Chen; Richard S E Keefe Journal: Neuropsychopharmacology Date: 2015-02-17 Impact factor: 7.853