Literature DB >> 30938759

Data linkages between patient-powered research networks and health plans: a foundation for collaborative research.

Abiy Agiro1, Xiaoxue Chen1, Biruk Eshete1, Rebecca Sutphen2, Elizabeth Bourquardez Clark2, Cristina M Burroughs2, W Benjamin Nowell3, Jeffrey R Curtis4, Sara Loud5, Robert McBurney5, Peter A Merkel6, Antoine G Sreih6, Kalen Young7, Kevin Haynes1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Patient-powered research networks (PPRNs) are a valuable source of patient-generated information. Diagnosis code-based algorithms developed by PPRNs can be used to query health plans' claims data to identify patients for research opportunities. Our objective was to implement privacy-preserving record linkage processes between PPRN members' and health plan enrollees' data, compare linked and nonlinked members, and measure disease-specific confirmation rates for specific health conditions.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This descriptive study identified overlapping members from 4 PPRN registries and 14 health plans. Our methods for the anonymous linkage of overlapping members used secure Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act-compliant, 1-way, cryptographic hash functions. Self-reported diagnoses by PPRN members were compared with claims-based computable phenotypes to calculate confirmation rates across varying durations of health plan coverage.
RESULTS: Data for 21 616 PPRN members were hashed. Of these, 4487 (21%) members were linked, regardless of any expected overlap with the health plans. Linked members were more likely to be female and younger than nonlinked members were. Irrespective of duration of enrollment, the confirmation rates for the breast or ovarian cancer, rheumatoid or psoriatic arthritis or psoriasis, multiple sclerosis, or vasculitis PPRNs were 72%, 50%, 75%, and 67%, increasing to 91%, 67%, 93%, and 80%, respectively, for members with ≥5 years of continuous health plan enrollment.
CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that PPRN membership and health plan data can be successfully linked using privacy-preserving record linkage methodology, and used to confirm self-reported diagnosis. Identifying and confirming self-reported diagnosis of members can expedite patient selection for research opportunities, shorten study recruitment timelines, and optimize costs.
© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Medical Informatics Association. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  anonymous linkage methods; claims-based computable phenotypes; data hashing; patient-powered research networks; patient-reported information

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30938759      PMCID: PMC7647185          DOI: 10.1093/jamia/ocz012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc        ISSN: 1067-5027            Impact factor:   4.497


  22 in total

1.  Linking patients' records across organizations while maintaining anonymity.

Authors:  Boonchai Kijsanayotin; Stuart M Speedie; Donald P Connelly
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2007-10-11

Review 2.  Linking automated databases for research in managed care settings.

Authors:  J V Selby
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1997-10-15       Impact factor: 25.391

3.  PCORI at 3 years--progress, lessons, and plans.

Authors:  Joseph V Selby; Steven H Lipstein
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2014-02-13       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Mortality risk associated with rheumatoid arthritis in a prospective cohort of older women: results from the Iowa Women's Health Study.

Authors:  T R Mikuls; K G Saag; L A Criswell; L A Merlino; R A Kaslow; B J Shelton; J R Cerhan
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 19.103

5.  An Evaluation of Algorithms for Identifying Metastatic Breast, Lung, or Colorectal Cancer in Administrative Claims Data.

Authors:  Joanna L Whyte; Nicole M Engel-Nitz; April Teitelbaum; Gabriel Gomez Rey; Joel D Kallich
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 2.983

6.  Caveats for the use of operational electronic health record data in comparative effectiveness research.

Authors:  William R Hersh; Mark G Weiner; Peter J Embi; Judith R Logan; Philip R O Payne; Elmer V Bernstam; Harold P Lehmann; George Hripcsak; Timothy H Hartzog; James J Cimino; Joel H Saltz
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 2.983

7.  Patient-powered research networks aim to improve patient care and health research.

Authors:  Rachael L Fleurence; Anne C Beal; Susan E Sheridan; Lorraine B Johnson; Joe V Selby
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 6.301

8.  Validation of rheumatoid arthritis diagnoses in health care utilization data.

Authors:  Seo Young Kim; Amber Servi; Jennifer M Polinski; Helen Mogun; Michael E Weinblatt; Jeffrey N Katz; Daniel H Solomon
Journal:  Arthritis Res Ther       Date:  2011-02-23       Impact factor: 5.156

9.  Patient and Stakeholder Engagement in the PCORI Pilot Projects: Description and Lessons Learned.

Authors:  Laura P Forsythe; Lauren E Ellis; Lauren Edmundson; Raj Sabharwal; Alison Rein; Kristen Konopka; Lori Frank
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2015-07-10       Impact factor: 5.128

10.  Launching PCORnet, a national patient-centered clinical research network.

Authors:  Rachael L Fleurence; Lesley H Curtis; Robert M Califf; Richard Platt; Joe V Selby; Jeffrey S Brown
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2014-05-12       Impact factor: 4.497

View more
  4 in total

1.  The importance of consumer- and patient-oriented perspectives in biomedical and health informatics.

Authors:  Suzanne Bakken
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2019-07-01       Impact factor: 4.497

2.  Harnessing health plan enrollee data to boost membership in patient-powered research networks.

Authors:  Xiaoxue Chen; Abiy Agiro; W Benjamin Nowell; Sara Loud; Robert McBurney; Kalen Young; Rebecca Sutphen; Elizabeth Bourquardez Clark; Cristina M Burroughs; Jeffrey R Curtis; Antoine G Sreih; Peter A Merkel; Kevin Haynes
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2020-05-25       Impact factor: 2.655

3.  Which patient-reported outcomes do rheumatology patients find important to track digitally? A real-world longitudinal study in ArthritisPower.

Authors:  W Benjamin Nowell; Kelly Gavigan; Carol L Kannowski; Zhihong Cai; Theresa Hunter; Shilpa Venkatachalam; Julie Birt; Jennifer Workman; Jeffrey R Curtis
Journal:  Arthritis Res Ther       Date:  2021-02-10       Impact factor: 5.156

4.  Patient-Powered Research Networks of the Autoimmune Research Collaborative: Rationale, Capacity, and Future Directions.

Authors:  W Benjamin Nowell; Peter A Merkel; Robert N McBurney; Kalen Young; Shilpa Venkatachalam; Dianne G Shaw; Angela Dobes; Emily Cerciello; Laura Kolaczkowski; Jeffrey R Curtis; Michael D Kappelman
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2021-04-27       Impact factor: 3.883

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.