In transient absorption (TA) measurements on Cd-chalcogenide quantum dots (QDs), the presence of a band-edge (BE) bleach signal is commonly attributed entirely to conduction-band electrons in the 1S(e) state, neglecting contributions from BE holes. While this has been the accepted view for more than 20 years, and has often been used to distinguish electron and hole kinetics, the reason for the absence of a hole contribution to the BE-bleach has remained unclear. Here, we show with three independent experiments that holes do in fact have a significant impact on the BE-bleach of well-passivated Cd-chalcogenide QD samples. Transient absorption experiments on high photoluminescence quantum yield CdSe/CdS/ZnS core-shell-shell QDs clearly show an increase of the band-edge bleach as holes cool down to the band edge. The relative contribution of electron-to-hole bleach is 2:1, as predicted by theory. The same measurements on core-only CdSe QDs with a lower quantum yield do not show a contribution of holes to the band-edge bleach. We assign the lack of hole bleach to the presence of ultrafast hole trapping in samples with insufficient passivation of the QD surface. In addition, we show measurements of optical gain in core-shell-shell QD solutions, providing clear evidence of a significant hole contribution to the BE transient absorption signal. Finally, we present spectroelectrochemical measurements on CdTe QDs films, showing the presence of a BE-bleach for both electron and hole injections. The presence of a contribution of holes to the bleach in passivated Cd-chalcogenides QDs bears important implications for quantitative studies on optical gain as well as for TA determinations of carrier dynamics.
In transient absorption (TA) measurements on Cd-chalcogenide quantum dots (QDs), the presence of a band-edge (BE) bleach signal is commonly attributed entirely to conduction-band electrons in the 1S(e) state, neglecting contributions from BE holes. While this has been the accepted view for more than 20 years, and has often been used to distinguish electron and hole kinetics, the reason for the absence of a hole contribution to the BE-bleach has remained unclear. Here, we show with three independent experiments that holes do in fact have a significant impact on the BE-bleach of well-passivated Cd-chalcogenide QD samples. Transient absorption experiments on high photoluminescence quantum yield CdSe/CdS/ZnS core-shell-shell QDs clearly show an increase of the band-edge bleach as holes cool down to the band edge. The relative contribution of electron-to-hole bleach is 2:1, as predicted by theory. The same measurements on core-only CdSe QDs with a lower quantum yield do not show a contribution of holes to the band-edge bleach. We assign the lack of hole bleach to the presence of ultrafast hole trapping in samples with insufficient passivation of the QD surface. In addition, we show measurements of optical gain in core-shell-shell QD solutions, providing clear evidence of a significant hole contribution to the BE transient absorption signal. Finally, we present spectroelectrochemical measurements on CdTe QDs films, showing the presence of a BE-bleach for both electron and hole injections. The presence of a contribution of holes to the bleach in passivated Cd-chalcogenides QDs bears important implications for quantitative studies on optical gain as well as for TA determinations of carrier dynamics.
Cadmium chalcogenide
quantum
dots (QDs) have been among the earliest QD systems to be investigated,
and are still at the forefront of QD research, with applications in
solar cells,[1−3] transistors,[4−6] LEDs,[7,8] catalysis,[9−11] and lasing.[12−14] In particular, recent breakthroughs in electrically
pumped core–shell QD lasers[15] confirm
the potentials of these QD materials in low-threshold lasing applications.
Understanding the behavior of band-edge (BE) absorption in QDs is
a necessary step in the development of optoelectronic applications,
and has been the focus of years of spectroscopic investigation.[16−21]In the presence of excited carriers, the BE absorption of
QDs decreases
in intensity, an effect called absorption bleach. Numerous reports
have claimed that the BE-bleach in Cdchalcogenide QDs seems to be
entirely dominated by the presence of electrons in the conduction
BE state, with no evidence of a hole contribution to the effect.[19,22−25] This observation has important consequences for both applied and
fundamental studies on Cd chalcogenides: the lack of a hole contribution
implies a negligible amount of stimulated emission, preventing the
realization of optical gain; furthermore, complete assignment of the
BE-bleach to electrons has been a widely used assumption in the determination
of electron kinetics from transient absorption (TA) measurements of
bleach decays.[10,26]Despite the claim on the
lack of a hole-induced bleach, the underlying
reason remains ambiguous, with studies suggesting the presence of
efficient hole trapping,[27,28] a high degeneracy of
thermally populated hole states,[23,29] or a combination
thereof.[22]Here we present three
independent experiments that clearly demonstrate
the presence of a significant hole contribution to the BE-bleach of
CdSe and CdTe QDs. According to the present work, the lack of a hole
contribution depends on the presence of unpassivated trap states and
is not an intrinsic property of II–VI QDs. We performed TA
measurements, exciting CdSe/CdS/ZnS core–shell–shell
QDs at the 1S [1S3/2(h)-1S(e)] transition and 2S [2S3/2(h)-1S(e)] transition. Comparison of the two bleach dynamics
revealed the presence of a 210 ± 20 fs ingrowth upon 2S excitation,
while the growth of the 1S signal is limited by the (130 fs) time
resolution of the measurement. As the two excitations differ only
for the initial hole state, the difference between the two bleach
kinetics demonstrates the presence of a hole contribution to the BE-bleach.
The ratio between the electron and hole bleach contribution, extracted
from the amplitude of the ingrowth component of the bleach upon 2S
excitation, is found to be 2:1. This observation is in excellent agreement
with a simple transition-counting model for the bleach of a transition
involving a 2-fold degenerate electron state and a 4-fold degenerate
hole state. Interestingly, repeating the measurement on core-only
CdSe QDs showed identical kinetics for the two excitations, confirming
the role of hole trapping in the removal of the hole contribution
from the bleach. The latter explains the absence of the observation
of a hole bleach in previous reports.[27,28,3,29]We provide further
evidence for the contribution of holes to the
BE-bleach by showing optical gain in solutions of CdSe/CdS/ZnS QDs.
The observation of optical gain directly implies the presence of stimulated
emission, which in turn is a tell-tale sign of a contribution of holes
to the BE-bleach. Comparison of the measured gain with predictions
from the transition-counting model shows quantitative agreement.Finally, we present spectroelectrochemical measurements on films
of CdTe QDs. We show that both electron injection (reducing potentials)
and hole injection (oxidizing potentials) result in a clear bleach
of the BE transition. These results clarify the presence of a hole
contribution to the BE-bleach of Cd chalcogenides QD systems, paving
the way for quantitative prediction of the gain threshold in this
highly investigated material system.
Results and Discussion
QD Synthesis and Material
Properties
We synthesized
CdSe/CdS/ZnS QDs with a low polydispersity (standard deviation in
particle diameter 7%) and high PL performance, following descriptions
in recent literature.[33,34] The steady state absorption and
PL spectra of the core–shell–shell QDs are shown in Figure a, labeled following
a multiband effective mass approximation description of electronic
states in the strong coupling regime.[30−32] The photoluminescence
quantum yield (PLQY) was determined to be 82% (see Supporting Information). The low polydispersity leads to sharp
absorption features that allow state selective excitation, which simplifies
the analysis of the transient absorption spectra. The high PLQY ensures
the sample is hardly affected by carrier trapping.
Figure 1
Schematics of optical
bleaching and possible scenarios in core–shell–shell
CdSe QDs. (a) Absorption and photoluminescence spectrum of the CdSe/CdS/ZnS
core–shell–shell QDs. The different transitions in the
CdSe core are labeled according to the literature.[30−32] (b) Schematic
of the optical transitions in the TA experiments. Upon 1S excitation,
the band-edge (BE) absorption transition is bleached instantly
due to the presence of an electron in the 1Se state and
the presence of a hole in the 1S3/2(h) state. Upon 2S excitation
of the 2S3/2(h)-1Se transition, the BE-bleach should theoretically
show an ingrowth over time (sub picosecond), related to fast hole
cooling from the 2S3/2(h) to the 1S3/2(h) state.
Schematics of optical
bleaching and possible scenarios in core–shell–shell
CdSe QDs. (a) Absorption and photoluminescence spectrum of the CdSe/CdS/ZnS
core–shell–shell QDs. The different transitions in the
CdSe core are labeled according to the literature.[30−32] (b) Schematic
of the optical transitions in the TA experiments. Upon 1S excitation,
the band-edge (BE) absorption transition is bleached instantly
due to the presence of an electron in the 1Se state and
the presence of a hole in the 1S3/2(h) state. Upon 2S excitation
of the 2S3/2(h)-1Se transition, the BE-bleach should theoretically
show an ingrowth over time (sub picosecond), related to fast hole
cooling from the 2S3/2(h) to the 1S3/2(h) state.
Evidence of Hole Contribution
to the BE-Bleach via Ultrafast
TA Measurements
We attempt to determine the contribution
of holes to the BE-bleach by selectively exciting either the 1S [1S3/2(h)-1S(e)] (616 nm) or the 2S [2S3/2(h)-1S(e)]
transition (581 nm). Figure b shows a schematic of the carrier dynamics expected for the
two excitations. Upon optical excitation of the 1S transition, both
carriers populate the BE levels, immediately contributing to the BE-bleach,
while upon 2S excitation the hole initially populates the 2S3/2(h) state and does not contribute to the BE-bleach. After a certain
cooling time (τcool), the hole relaxes to the 1S3/2(h) state. In this scenario, with carrier dynamics unaffected
by trapping, the presence of a hole contribution to the BE-bleach
would result in a difference in the ingrowth-kinetics of the bleach
signals in the two excitations.We performed TA measurements
on the sample in the low-fluence regime, in which the pump beam excites
an average number of excitons per QD much smaller than unity, while
vigorously stirring the solution to avoid photocharging effects.[35]Figure a,b shows 2D TA color maps for 1S and 2S excitation, respectively.
Although the two measurements show identical TA signals in the time
window between 1 ps and 3 ns after photoexcitation, clear differences
between them can be observed in the early time behavior of the BE-bleach
(at 618 nm). To highlight the difference in the two responses, spectral
cuts of the 2D TA color maps are shown in Figure c,d, displaying the differential absorption
signal for different color mapss. The transient absorption spectrum
in the 1S-excitation measurement (Figure c) remains constant after the coherent artifact
response.[36] The 2S-excitation measurement,
shown in Figure d,
shows a clear growth of the BE-bleach occurring in the first hundreds
of femtoseconds after photoexcitation. As the only difference between
the two measurements is the initial hole state, this clearly demonstrates
a significant influence of the hole on the BE-bleach: as holes cool
down to the BE state, the BE-bleach increases. Below we perform a
quantitative analysis on these transient absorption measurements.
We focus only on the region of the 1S transition since spectral overlap
between different transitions prevents unambiguous quantitative description
of the transient absorption signals at a higher energy.
Figure 2
2D TA measurements
on the CdSe/CdS/ZnS QDs during the first picosecond
upon 1S and 2S excitation. (a) 2D TA image for excitation resonant
with the 1S and (b) 2S transition. Excitation of the 1S transition
shows an instantaneous appearance of the BE-bleach. (c) Differential
absorption of the CdSe QD BE upon 1S and (d) 2S excitation. Excitation
of the 2S transition shows a clear ingrowth of the BE-bleach signal
in the first hundreds of femtoseconds after photoexcitation, indicative
of hole cooling from the 2S3/2(h) to the 1S3/2(h) state.
2D TA measurements
on the CdSe/CdS/ZnS QDs during the first picosecond
upon 1S and 2S excitation. (a) 2D TA image for excitation resonant
with the 1S and (b) 2S transition. Excitation of the 1S transition
shows an instantaneous appearance of the BE-bleach. (c) Differential
absorption of the CdSe QD BE upon 1S and (d) 2S excitation. Excitation
of the 2S transition shows a clear ingrowth of the BE-bleach signal
in the first hundreds of femtoseconds after photoexcitation, indicative
of hole cooling from the 2S3/2(h) to the 1S3/2(h) state.
Quantitative Modeling of
the Hole Contribution to the BE-Bleach
In order to quantify
the impact of the hole on the BE-bleach, we
fitted the sum of two Gaussians to the time-dependent differential
absorption spectrum close to the energy of the BE absorption (Figure a), to account for
the partial overlap of the 1S and 2S bleach features. Although the
description of the TA signal at the energy of the 2S transition is
neglecting spectral overlap with higher energy components, the precise
shape of the 2S bleach has a little influence on the determination
of the 1Sbleach component (see Supporting Information). Figure b shows
the time dependence of the 1Sbleach component for 1S and 2S excitation.
Again, a clear difference is observed in the dynamics of the BE-bleach
between the two measurements, with the 2S excitation showing a clear
ingrowth during the first 500 fs, while upon 1S excitation the BE
remains constant after a 130 fs resolution-limited increase. After
cooling is completed, the bleach per absorbed photon in the two excitations
is the same, confirming that the number of carriers reaching the band
edge in the two excitations is the same (see Supporting Information). The ingrowth of the BE-bleach in the 2S-excitation
measurement is fitted with the sum of a step function (1S electrons)
and an exponential increase (1S holes), convolved with a Gaussian
Instrument Response Function (IRF, see Supporting Information). The fit yields a time constant for the ingrowth
of 210 ± 20 fs, in agreement with the expected fast dynamics
of hole relaxation[37] (see Supporting Information).
Figure 3
Analysis of the BE bleach in TA experiments
upon 1S and 2S excitation
of the CdSe/CdS/ZnS NCs. (a) We fit two Gaussians to the BE-bleach,
which correspond to the 1S3/2(h)-1S(e) and 2S3/2(h)-1S(e) transitions, and extract the contribution of each transition
to the TA signal for different pump–probe delay times. (b)
Normalized amplitude of the BE-bleach upon exciting the 1S and 2S
transition (red and orange). 2S excitation leads to an ingrowth of
the BE-bleach on a time scale of hundreds of femtoseconds, whereas
for 1S excitation the BE-bleach appears instantly. Fitting the 2S-excitation
signal with a step increase due to the electron and an exponential
ingrowth due to the hole (convolved with the IRF, see Supporting Information) produces a good agreement
with the data (dotted light blue) and allows to quantify the time
dependence of the hole contribution (dark blue). (c) Schematic of
the transition-counting model used to extract the contributions of
the electron and exciton to the magnitude of the BE-bleach.
Analysis of the BEbleach in TA experiments
upon 1S and 2S excitation
of the CdSe/CdS/ZnS NCs. (a) We fit two Gaussians to the BE-bleach,
which correspond to the 1S3/2(h)-1S(e) and 2S3/2(h)-1S(e) transitions, and extract the contribution of each transition
to the TA signal for different pump–probe delay times. (b)
Normalized amplitude of the BE-bleach upon exciting the 1S and 2S
transition (red and orange). 2S excitation leads to an ingrowth of
the BE-bleach on a time scale of hundreds of femtoseconds, whereas
for 1S excitation the BE-bleach appears instantly. Fitting the 2S-excitation
signal with a step increase due to the electron and an exponential
ingrowth due to the hole (convolved with the IRF, see Supporting Information) produces a good agreement
with the data (dotted light blue) and allows to quantify the time
dependence of the hole contribution (dark blue). (c) Schematic of
the transition-counting model used to extract the contributions of
the electron and exciton to the magnitude of the BE-bleach.The ratio
between the hole bleach (ΔAh) and
the exciton bleach (ΔAX), extracted
from the fit, amounts to 0.32
± 0.02. This value can be compared to the prediction based on
a widely used model based on state filling of degenerate energy levels,[14,15,38,39] schematically shown in Figure c. Assuming equal oscillator strength for all the energy-degenerate
transitions, the total absorbance is given by a sum over identical
contributions A* for each transition, represented
as red, upward arrows in Figure c. The presence of an electron and/or a hole in one
of the two states involved in a transition induces state filling,
as well as stimulated emission, both leading to a reduction of the
net absorption. In the low-fluence limit relevant for comparisons
with the measurements, the steady state absorbance A0 and the excited-state absorbance A′
in the presence of an occupation, ne and nh, of the electron and hole states can be written
aswhere ge (gh) represents
the electron
(hole) degeneracy. The term proportional to nenh originates from stimulated
emission, represented by a green, downward arrow in Figure c. It follows from eqs and 2 that the differential absorbance, ΔA = A′ – A0, in the
presence of an exciton (ne = 1, nh = 1) and in the presence of a hole (ne = 0, nh = 1) can
be expressed asWithin this model, the ratio
of the hole and exciton BE-bleach, , is entirely determined by the degeneracy
of the BE states. Setting the BE degeneracies to the theoretically
predicted values (ge = 2 and gh = 4)[40] results in a ratio
of the hole-to-exciton bleach , in a quantitative agreement with the value
(0.32 ± 0.03) we measured. Although the simple model neglects
the presence of angular momentum selection rules for optical transitions,
accounting for angular momentum conservation, leads to the same quantitative
results (see Supporting Information). We
conclude that the bleach dynamics of near-unity PLQY CdSe core–shell
QDs can be entirely explained in terms of the commonly accepted values
for the BE degeneracies of single-particle electron and hole states
in CdSe QDs,[14,38,41] ruling out the presence of a high-degeneracy quasi-continuum of
BE hole states.
Absence of Hole Contribution
to the BE-Bleach for Unpassivated
QDs
It is likely that the presence of a high density of surface
traps incomplete surface passivation via thinner shells or lack of
time resolution contributed to hide the BE hole bleach contribution
in previous TA studies of CdSe QDs. We studied the importance of good
surface passivation for the determination of the hole bleach, via
comparison between the high-PLQY, core–shell–shell CdSe/CdS/ZnS
QDs, shown in Figure , and low-PLQY (6.5%), core-only CdSe QDs. Recent work by our group[26,42] and others[43] has shown that PL quenching
for core-only Cd-chalcogenide QDs is dominated by the presence of
localized hole states in the band gap, leading to ultrafast hole trapping.
These trap states originate from undercoordinated chalcogenide atoms
at the surface of the QDs,[26,42,43] which can be passivated by Z-type ligands.[44]Figure a,b
shows 2D TA color maps for the core-only CdSe NCs, excited at the
1S and the 2S transition, respectively. A striking similarity is observed
in the dynamics of the BE-bleach between the two measurements. Figure c compares the temporal
evolution of the BE-bleach for the two excitations, revealing that
the bleach components follow the same kinetics in both measurements.
This implies that the hole trapping rate exceeds both the cooling
rate (i.e., τtrap ≪ τcool) and the time resolution of the measurement (for a more quantitative
discussion on the trapping dynamics, see Figure S9). Thus, the TA measurement probes QDs populated by a trapped
hole and a conduction BE electron, irrespective of the initial excitation.
These results demonstrate that the contribution of holes to the BE-bleach
is completely obscured by fast hole trapping in low-PLQY samples.
Figure 4
Analysis
on the core-only, low-PLQY CdSe QDs upon 1S and 2S excitation,
showing fast hole trapping. (a) 2D TA images for 1S and (b) 2S excitation,
up to 1 ps after photoexcitation on the core-only CdSe QDs. In both
cases, we do not see an ingrowth of the BE-bleach. (c) Amplitude of
the BE-bleach upon exciting the 1S (red) and 2S (yellow) transitions.
Note that the bleaches appear simultaneously and instantly after photoexcitation
in both cases; i.e. we do not observe the hole cooling, which is in
contrast with the BE-bleach of the high-PLQY NCs from Figure . (d) Schematic representation
of hole relaxation pathways after photoexcitation. In high-PLQY samples,
with little to no hole trapping, the hole relaxes to the BE level
[1S3/2(h)], where it contributes accordingly to the BE-bleach
in the fs-TA experiments. In samples where there is fast hole trapping,
the hole is rapidly localized in a trap state and does not contribute
anymore to the BE-bleach signal in our fs-TA experiments.
Analysis
on the core-only, low-PLQY CdSe QDs upon 1S and 2S excitation,
showing fast hole trapping. (a) 2D TA images for 1S and (b) 2S excitation,
up to 1 ps after photoexcitation on the core-only CdSe QDs. In both
cases, we do not see an ingrowth of the BE-bleach. (c) Amplitude of
the BE-bleach upon exciting the 1S (red) and 2S (yellow) transitions.
Note that the bleaches appear simultaneously and instantly after photoexcitation
in both cases; i.e. we do not observe the hole cooling, which is in
contrast with the BE-bleach of the high-PLQY NCs from Figure . (d) Schematic representation
of hole relaxation pathways after photoexcitation. In high-PLQY samples,
with little to no hole trapping, the hole relaxes to the BE level
[1S3/2(h)], where it contributes accordingly to the BE-bleach
in the fs-TA experiments. In samples where there is fast hole trapping,
the hole is rapidly localized in a trap state and does not contribute
anymore to the BE-bleach signal in our fs-TA experiments.
Hole Cooling in Z-Type Ligand (InCl3) Passivated
CdSe Core-Only QDs
We have attributed the lack of hole cooling
in unpassivated core-only QDs to ultrafast hole trapping, also leading
to low PLQY in these samples. This interpretation suggests it should
be possible to observe hole cooling in core-only CdSe QDs when their
PLQY is high enough; i.e., the hole trapping is sufficiently slow
or absent from a portion of the QD population. Below, we show that
Z-type ligand passivation of the surface of core-only CdSe QDs increases
their PLQY, and allows us to observe the cooling of the hole from
the 2S3/2 into the 1S3/2 hole state in TA experiments.Proper passivation of the CdSe QD surface can in principle lead
to high-PLQY core-only samples.[45] We passivated
the surface of CdSe QDs cores with InCl3, a Lewis acid
that acts as a Z-type ligand, following work that was recently published
by our group.[44] The steady state absorption
and PL spectra are shown in Figure a. After the InCl3 surface treatment, the
PLQY of the CdSe QDs sample increased from 2% to 21%. Figure b shows the BE-bleach for 1S
and 2S excitation of these passivated CdSe QDs dispersed in toluene.
A clear ingrowth of the BE-bleach amplitude is observed when photoexciting
the 2S transition; i.e., the hole cools down from the 2S3/2 hole state to the 1S3/2 hole state, whereas the growth
of the BE-bleach upon 1S excitation is limited by the time resolution.
Fitting the data with the same model presented for the high-PLQY core–shell–shell
QDs, we obtain a ratio for the hole-to-exciton bleach in the InCl3 passivated CdSe cores of 0.10 ± 0.02, with a hole cooling
time of 190 ± 40 fs, closely matching the value obtained on the
core–shell–shell QDs.
Figure 5
Evidence of hole contribution to the BE-bleach
in Z-type ligand
(InCl3) passivated core-only CdSe QDs with TA. (a) Absorption
and PL spectra of the unpassivated and InCl3 passivated
core-only QDs. The PLQY is increased by an order of magnitude. (b)
Comparison between 1S and 2S excitation on CdSe cores, which are passivated
with InCl3. The ingrowth of the BE-bleach due to the relaxation
of the hole from the 2S to 1S state is clearly visible and constitutes
10% of the total BE-bleach amplitude. (c) Comparison of the BE-bleach
amplitude between unpassivated core-only CdSe QDs, InCl3 passivated QDs, and the core–shell QDs earlier presented
in this Letter. The inset shows a photograph of the unpassivated (2%
PLQY) and InCl3 passivated (21% PLQY) QDs. (d) BE-bleach
amplitude after 1S excitation on the same samples presented in panel
c.
Evidence of hole contribution to the BE-bleach
in Z-type ligand
(InCl3) passivated core-only CdSe QDs with TA. (a) Absorption
and PL spectra of the unpassivated and InCl3 passivated
core-only QDs. The PLQY is increased by an order of magnitude. (b)
Comparison between 1S and 2S excitation on CdSe cores, which are passivated
with InCl3. The ingrowth of the BE-bleach due to the relaxation
of the hole from the 2S to 1S state is clearly visible and constitutes
10% of the total BE-bleach amplitude. (c) Comparison of the BE-bleach
amplitude between unpassivated core-only CdSe QDs, InCl3 passivated QDs, and the core–shell QDs earlier presented
in this Letter. The inset shows a photograph of the unpassivated (2%
PLQY) and InCl3 passivated (21% PLQY) QDs. (d) BE-bleach
amplitude after 1S excitation on the same samples presented in panel
c.We associate
the increase in PLQY to the suppression
of the trapping process in part of the QD population, due to an improved
chemical passivation of surface traps.[44] In the passivated QDs, holes contribute to the BE ingrowth, while
in the unpassivated portion of the population the BE signal is dominated
by the electron contribution. As a result, the amount of hole contribution
to the BE signal for the InCl3 passivated cores is expected
to be lower than in the core–shell–shell sample, in
line with the difference in PLQY. Figure c presents the amplitude of the BE-bleach
after exciting the 2S transition of the unpassivated QDs, the InCl3 passivated QDs and the core–shell–shell QDs.
The ingrowth follows a clear trend with increasing PLQY; better passivation
of the CdSe QDs leads to a higher contribution of holes to the BE-bleach.
As we passivate possible hole traps on the surface of the QDs better,
a larger fraction of photoexcited holes survive the cooling process
from the 2S3/2 to the 1S3/2 state.Figure d shows
the amplitude of the BE-bleach upon 1S excitation of the unpassivated
cores, InCl3-treated cores and core–shell–shell
QDs. Although all samples have a decay component with a picosecond
lifetime, InCl3-treated cores and unpassivated cores show
sign of faster decay components, possibly associated with the ultrafast
hole trapping process assumed in our description. However, the presence
of multiple coherent bleach oscillations, typically associated with
phonon-emission processes,[46−48] and limits in the time resolution
of the measurements prevents quantitative determination of the character
of the fastest decay component (see Supporting Information).The experiments on these InCl3-passivated QDs show that
holes do indeed contribute to the BE-bleach in CdSe QDs cores, with
an amplitude determined by the degree of QD passivation.
Evidence of
a Hole Contribution to the BE-Bleach via Optical
Gain and Spectroelectrochemistry
Another spectroscopic signature
of a significant hole contribution to the BE-bleach can be found in
the presence of optical gain at the energy of the 1S transition. Figure a shows a high-fluence
TA measurement on the CdSe/CdS/ZnS QDs, performed exciting the system
at 400 nm with a fluence of 1.86 × 1014 photons/cm2 per pulse, resulting in an average of 2.07 excitons per QD. Figure b compares the steady
state absorbance of the measured sample (black) to excited-state absorbances
for different excitation fluences ( = 0.86 in orange and 2.07 in red), obtained
adding the differential absorbance at 4.5 ps after photoexcitation
to the steady state spectrum. For the higher fluence measurement (red),
the excited-state absorbance is negative on the low-energy side of
the 1S absorption feature, an effect which would not be possible in
the absence of a hole contribution to both stimulated emission and
state filling of the 1S transition. The red trace in Figure b shows that net gain is observed
in the presence of approximately two excitons per QD. In the absence
of a hole contribution to the BE-bleach, a doubly excited QD with
2-fold degenerate conduction BE should have zero absorption (i.e.,
the material is transparent at the BE energy), but would not show
gain.
Figure 6
Additional spectroscopic evidence of hole contribution to the BE-bleach.
(a) High-fluence TA color map of the CdSe/CdS/ZnS QDs, excited at
400 nm with a fluence of 6.54 × 1014 photons/cm2 per pulse, showing a maximum of the BE-bleach 4.5 ps after
photoexcitation. (b) Comparison between the excited-state absorption
spectrum (A0 + ΔA), obtained from the differential absorbance shown in panel a at
4.5 ps, and the steady state absorption (A0, black), clearly showing the presence of optical gain at = 2.07
excitons/QD. (c) Spectroelectrochemical
measurement on a film of CdTe QDs, showing the differential absorption
spectrum of the sample at reducing potentials (electron injection,
red curve) and oxidizing potentials (hole injection, blue curve, offset
for clarity). The bleach amplitude was extracted from a fit of the
signal with a Gaussian and a derivative-like feature, due to the presence
of a Stark shift induced by localized charges.[49]
Additional spectroscopic evidence of hole contribution to the BE-bleach.
(a) High-fluence TA color map of the CdSe/CdS/ZnS QDs, excited at
400 nm with a fluence of 6.54 × 1014 photons/cm2 per pulse, showing a maximum of the BE-bleach 4.5 ps after
photoexcitation. (b) Comparison between the excited-state absorption
spectrum (A0 + ΔA), obtained from the differential absorbance shown in panel a at
4.5 ps, and the steady state absorption (A0, black), clearly showing the presence of optical gain at = 2.07
excitons/QD. (c) Spectroelectrochemical
measurement on a film of CdTe QDs, showing the differential absorption
spectrum of the sample at reducing potentials (electron injection,
red curve) and oxidizing potentials (hole injection, blue curve, offset
for clarity). The bleach amplitude was extracted from a fit of the
signal with a Gaussian and a derivative-like feature, due to the presence
of a Stark shift induced by localized charges.[49]We applied
the transition-counting model, corrected
for Poissonian excitation statistics (see Supporting Information), to a QD with 2-fold degenerate conduction BE
and 4-fold degenerate valence BE. For an excitation density of = 2.07,
this model predicts a fractional
bleach ΔA/A0 =
1.21, in close agreement with the fractional bleach of 1.19 observed
from the TA measurement (see Supporting Information). This result shows that our quantitative assignment of the hole
contribution in the low-fluence BE-bleach remains valid in the high-fluence
regime: the transient absorption signal at the BE is well-described
by the sum of the contributions of electrons, with a degeneracy of
2, and holes, with a degeneracy of 4.Perhaps the conceptually
clearest proof of holes contributing to
a BE-bleach comes from experiments where only holes are injected.
In principle, hole injection could be done electrochemically and the
changes in absorption could be recorded. However, electrochemical
hole injection leads to rapid deterioration of CdSe QDs,[50] possibly due to irreversible oxidation of Se
surface ions and dissolution of Cd2+.[51] However, we found that for CdTe QDs stable hole injection
is possible, allowing spectroelectrochemical determination of the
hole bleach spectrum. The presence of a hole contribution to the BE-bleach
should be extendable to other Cd-chalcogenides QDs, as they all share
the same character of the BE transition.Figure c shows
differential absorption spectra obtained during a spectroelectrochemical
measurement of a film of CdTe QDs. A potential difference is applied
between the sample and a Ag pseudoreference electrode, which allows
us to control the Fermi level inside the QD film. Applying both a
reducing potential (electron injection, red) and oxidizing potential
(hole injection, blue), we observed spectral changes at the BE energy.
These spectral changes are caused by the superposition of a bleach
feature and of a derivative-like feature, associated with a Stark
shift induced by the presence of trapped electrons.[52] We fitted the BE signal in the two traces, separating the
bleach component (red and blue lines in Figure c) and the Stark-shift component (see Supporting Information). The similarity in the
spectral shape of the BE signals and the presence of a bleach component
in both the spectra demonstrates that holes have a contribution to
the BE-bleach similar to the contribution of electrons. Furthermore,
we extracted the BE-bleach at each potential from a fit of the differential
absorbance spectra, showing the presence of two distinct onsets in
the bleach amplitude, corresponding to electron and hole injection
(see Supporting Information). This clearly
shows that electrochemical hole injection results in a measurable
BE-bleach in CdTe QDs.
Conclusions
To
summarize, we have provided three independent
pieces of evidence that holes contribute to the BE-bleach in Cd-chalcogenide
QDs. We measured TA in the low-fluence regime on high-PLQY CdSe core–shell–shell
QD solutions, identifying a component in the bleach kinetics associated
with hole cooling. The relative weight of the photogenerated hole
to the BE-bleach amounts to half the weight of the electron, consistent
with a simple theoretical model for the bleach of degenerate transitions.
Measurements on low-PLQY CdSe core-only QDs do not show a dependence
on the initial hole state. InCl3-treated QDs, which have
an intermediate PLQY between cores and core–shell–shell
particles, show the presence of a hole component in the bleach, with
a smaller amplitude than in the core–shell–shell QDs.
These observations support the conclusion that ultrafast hole trapping
in samples with incomplete passivation obscures the hole contribution
to the BE-bleach. We also show that optical gain of the BE transition
can be achieved for relatively low excitation densities = 2),
which implies a significant contribution
of a BE hole to the BE-bleach. Furthermore, we measured a bleach upon
electrochemical hole injection in CdTe QDs, confirming that holes
contribute to the BE-bleach of Cd chalcogenides QDs even in the absence
of BE electrons.Once demonstrated, the presence of a hole bleach
can be used for spectroscopic analysis, allowing to differentiate
between BE and trapped holes. Furthermore, our results suggest that
measurements of TABE-bleach can be employed to investigate the kinetics
of hole processes in high-PLQY Cd chalcogenides QDs, by monitoring
the kinetics of the hole contribution to the bleach. Finally, we showed
remarkable agreement between calculations of the fractional bleach
in the presence of hole contribution and our experimental results.
This observation paves the way to more quantitative studies of the
buildup of optical gain in these materials, which will give solid
handholds to improve these materials for applications in low-threshold
gain media.
Authors: V I Klimov; A A Mikhailovsky; S Xu; A Malko; J A Hollingsworth; C A Leatherdale; H Eisler; M G Bawendi Journal: Science Date: 2000-10-13 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: John A McGuire; Milan Sykora; István Robel; Lazaro A Padilha; Jin Joo; Jeffrey M Pietryga; Victor I Klimov Journal: ACS Nano Date: 2010-10-26 Impact factor: 15.881
Authors: Victor I Klimov; Sergei A Ivanov; Jagjit Nanda; Marc Achermann; Ilya Bezel; John A McGuire; Andrei Piryatinski Journal: Nature Date: 2007-05-24 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Simon C Boehme; Jon Mikel Azpiroz; Yaroslav V Aulin; Ferdinand C Grozema; Daniël Vanmaekelbergh; Laurens D A Siebbeles; Ivan Infante; Arjan J Houtepen Journal: Nano Lett Date: 2015-04-14 Impact factor: 11.189
Authors: Michael M Adachi; Fengjia Fan; Daniel P Sellan; Sjoerd Hoogland; Oleksandr Voznyy; Arjan J Houtepen; Kevin D Parrish; Pongsakorn Kanjanaboos; Jonathan A Malen; Edward H Sargent Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2015-10-23 Impact factor: 14.919
Authors: Ward van der Stam; Indy du Fossé; Gianluca Grimaldi; Julius O V Monchen; Nicholas Kirkwood; Arjan J Houtepen Journal: Chem Mater Date: 2018-10-23 Impact factor: 9.811
Authors: María C Gélvez-Rueda; Magnus B Fridriksson; Rajeev K Dubey; Wolter F Jager; Ward van der Stam; Ferdinand C Grozema Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2020-04-20 Impact factor: 14.919