Literature DB >> 30938412

Impact of a tailored surgical approach on autograft root dimensions in patients undergoing the Ross procedure for aortic regurgitation†.

Ismail Bouhout1, Aly Ghoneim1, Michael Tousch1, Louis Mathieu Stevens2, Trevor Semplonius1, Mohammed Tarabzoni3, Nancy Poirier1, Raymond Cartier1, Philippe Demers1, Linrui Guo3, Michael W A Chu3, Ismail El-Hamamsy1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The Ross procedure in patients with aortic regurgitation (AR) has been associated with increased autograft dilatation and late reintervention. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of a tailored approach aimed at mitigating that risk on early changes in autograft root dimensions following the Ross procedure in patients with AR.
METHODS: From 2011 to 2018, 241 consecutive patients underwent a Ross procedure with >1 year of follow-up [46 (7) years]. Aortic root dimensions were prospectively measured on serial echocardiograms. Patients with aortic stenosis group (n = 171; 71%) were compared to those with AR or mixed aortic disease (AR group) (n = 70; 29%). Mean length of follow-up was 29 ± 11 months (100% complete). Changes in aortic dimensions were analysed using mixed-effect models.
RESULTS: At 4 years, mean indexed diameters of the annulus, sinuses of Valsalva and the sinotubular junction in the AR group were 12.3 (0.2) mm/m2, 20.0 (0.4) mm/m2 and 16.3 (0.9) mm/m2, respectively, vs 11.9 (0.2), 18.4 (0.3) and 15.5 (0.5) in the aortic stenosis group. Overall, there were no significant differences in the rates of autograft annulus, sinuses of Valsalva and sinotubular junction dimension changes between the aortic stenosis and AR groups up to 4 years after surgery (P = 0.55, P = 0.12, P = 0.59 and P = 0.48, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: Use of a tailored surgical approach, combined with a strict blood pressure control, appears to mitigate clinically significant early dilatation of the autograft root following a Ross procedure in patients with AR. Further follow-up is needed to determine if this will translate into a lower incidence of long-term reintervention.
© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aortic regurgitation ; Aortic root ; Pulmonary autograft ; Root dilatation; Ross procedure

Year:  2019        PMID: 30938412     DOI: 10.1093/ejcts/ezz105

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg        ISSN: 1010-7940            Impact factor:   4.191


  7 in total

1.  Ross operation after failure of aortic valve repair.

Authors:  Karen B Abeln; Vincent Chauvette; Nancy Poirier; Shunsuke Matsushima; Ismail El-Hamamsy; Hans-Joachim Schäfers
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2021-07

2.  Commentary: Valve sparing surgery after the Ross procedure: Keeping the promise alive.

Authors:  Ismail El-Hamamsy
Journal:  JTCVS Tech       Date:  2021-02-27

3.  Commentary: The "girdle" Ross procedure: An adjunct to prevent late autograft failure in all Ross patients?

Authors:  Charles Laurin; François Dagenais
Journal:  JTCVS Tech       Date:  2021-08-20

4.  Commentary: The Ross procedure in a graft: A word of caution.

Authors:  Elbert Williams; Ismail El-Hamamsy
Journal:  JTCVS Tech       Date:  2021-09-24

5.  Commentary: Bespoke Ross procedure: Best fit for patients with aortic regurgitation?

Authors:  Ko Bando
Journal:  JTCVS Tech       Date:  2021-08-17

Review 6.  Understanding Pulmonary Autograft Remodeling After the Ross Procedure: Stick to the Facts.

Authors:  Lucas Van Hoof; Peter Verbrugghe; Elizabeth A V Jones; Jay D Humphrey; Stefan Janssens; Nele Famaey; Filip Rega
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-02-09

7.  Tailoring the Ross procedure for patients with aortic regurgitation.

Authors:  Amine Mazine; Ismail El-Hamamsy
Journal:  JTCVS Tech       Date:  2021-06-08
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.