Literature DB >> 30938200

Infection triples the cost of a primary joint arthroplasty.

Teija Puhto1,2, Ari-Pekka Puhto3, Markku Vielma4, Hannu Syrjälä1,2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In Europe few studies have analyzed the costs of treating aseptic revisions and prosthetic joint infections with either debridement, antibiotics and implant retention or two-stage revision, as compared to the cost of a primary total joint arthroplasty.
METHODS: The purpose was to analyze the costs of total joint arthroplasties, aseptic revisions and prosthetic joint infections treated with debridement, antibiotics and implant retention or a two-stage revision. We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients who had a total joint arthroplasty in the Oulu University Hospital during the three-year period from 2013 to 2015. The costs were divided to specific services (e.g. procedure costs, ward care costs, laboratory). Actual costs obtained from the hospital's financial database were used for analysis.
RESULTS: There were 1708 total joint arthroplasties without complications, 18 aseptic revisions and 42 prosthetic joint infections eligible for analysis. The mean cost of a total joint arthroplasty was €7200, the excess cost of an aseptic revision was €10,900 and the excess cost of a prosthetic joint infection was €18,900 (total joint arthroplasty vs. infection, p < .0001). The excess cost was €12,800 for debridement, antibiotics and implant retention treatment and €44,600 for a two-stage revision (p < .0001). The two most expensive services were ward care and procedures.
CONCLUSIONS: Infection tripled the cost of a total joint arthroplasty. The cost of two-stage revisions were triple that of debridement, antibiotics and implant retention treatment.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Prosthetic joint infection; aseptic revision; cost; total joint arthroplasty

Year:  2019        PMID: 30938200     DOI: 10.1080/23744235.2019.1572219

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Infect Dis (Lond)        ISSN: 2374-4243


  13 in total

1.  Projections and Epidemiology of Revision Hip and Knee Arthroplasty in the United States to 2030.

Authors:  Andrew M Schwartz; Kevin X Farley; George N Guild; Thomas L Bradbury
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2020-02-19       Impact factor: 4.757

2.  Serial C-reactive Protein Monitoring in Prosthetic Joint Infection: A Powerful Predictor or Potentially Pointless?

Authors:  Rafia Ghani; Jonathan Hutt; Philip Mitchell; Luke Granger; Nemandra A Sandiford
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2020-02-12

3.  Direct Inpatient Medical Costs of Operative Treatment of Periprosthetic Hip and Knee Infections Are Twofold Higher Than Those of Aseptic Revisions.

Authors:  Jie J Yao; Mario Hevesi; Sue L Visscher; Jeanine E Ransom; David G Lewallen; Daniel J Berry; Hilal Maradit Kremers
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2021-02-17       Impact factor: 5.284

4.  Comparison of the success rate after debridement, antibiotics and implant retention (DAIR) for periprosthetic joint infection among patients with or without a sinus tract.

Authors:  Wang Deng; Rui Li; Hongyi Shao; Baozhan Yu; Jiying Chen; Yixin Zhou
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2021-10-21       Impact factor: 2.362

5.  Economic Study of 2-Stage Exchange in Patients With Knee or Hip Prosthetic Joint Infection Managed in a Referral Center in France: Time to Use Innovative(s) Intervention(s) at the Time of Reimplantation to Reduce the Risk of Superinfection.

Authors:  Hassan Serrier; Christell Julien; Cécile Batailler; Eugénie Mabrut; Corinne Brochier; Sylvie Thevenon; Marianne Maynard-Muet; Agnes Henry; Sébastien Lustig; Laure Huot; Tristan Ferry
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-05-10

6.  Migration Patterns for Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty in the United States as Reported in the American Joint Replacement Registry.

Authors:  Kevin A Lawson; Antonia F Chen; Bryan D Springer; Richard L Illgen; David G Lewallen; James I Huddleston; Derek F Amanatullah
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2021-06-11       Impact factor: 4.435

7.  Delayed neutrophil recruitment allows nascent Staphylococcus aureus biofilm formation and immune evasion.

Authors:  Brian A Pettygrove; Rachel M Kratofil; Maria Alhede; Peter Ø Jensen; Michelle Newton; Klaus Qvortrup; Kyler B Pallister; Thomas Bjarnsholt; Paul Kubes; Jovanka M Voyich; Philip S Stewart
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2021-04-02       Impact factor: 15.304

8.  The Epidome - a species-specific approach to assess the population structure and heterogeneity of Staphylococcus epidermidis colonization and infection.

Authors:  Amalie Katrine Rendboe; Thor Bech Johannesen; Anna Cäcilia Ingham; Emeli Månsson; Søren Iversen; Sharmin Baig; Sofie Edslev; Jørgen Skov Jensen; Bo Söderquist; Paal Skytt Andersen; Marc Stegger
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2020-11-26       Impact factor: 3.605

9.  What Are the Long-term Outcomes of Mortality, Quality of Life, and Hip Function after Prosthetic Joint Infection of the Hip? A 10-year Follow-up from Sweden.

Authors:  Peter Wildeman; Ola Rolfson; Bo Söderquist; Per Wretenberg; Viktor Lindgren
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2021-10-01       Impact factor: 4.755

10.  Risk factors for reoperation due to periprosthetic joint infection after elective total hip arthroplasty: a study of 35,056 patients using linked data of the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Registry (SHAR) and Swedish Perioperative Registry (SPOR).

Authors:  Maria Qvistgaard; Jonatan Nåtman; Jenny Lovebo; Sofia Almerud-Österberg; Ola Rolfson
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-03-23       Impact factor: 2.362

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.