Literature DB >> 30938000

Maternal and neonatal complications of fetal macrosomia: cohort study.

J Beta1, N Khan1, M Fiolna1, A Khalil1, G Ramadan2, R Akolekar1,3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the risks of maternal and neonatal complications in pregnancies with macrosomia.
METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study conducted at a large maternity unit in the UK between January 2009 and December 2016. The incidence of maternal and neonatal complications in pregnancies with macrosomia, defined as birth weight (BW) > 4000 g, and in those with severe macrosomia, defined as BW > 4500 g, was compared with that in pregnancies with normal BW (2500-4000 g). Regression analysis was performed to determine odds ratios (ORs) for complications in macrosomic pregnancies compared to those with normal BW.
RESULTS: The study population of 35 548 pregnancies included 4522 (12.7%) with macrosomia, of which 643 (1.8%) had severe macrosomia, and 31 026 (87.3%) with normal BW. In the macrosomia group, the adjusted OR was 3.1 (95% CI, 2.6-3.6) for Cesarean section for failure to progress, 2.4 (95% CI, 2.0-3.0) for severe postpartum hemorrhage, 2.3 (95% CI, 1.9-2.8) for obstetric anal sphincter injury, 10.4 (95% CI, 8.6-12.6) for shoulder dystocia, 28.5 (95% CI, 8.9-90.7) for obstetric brachial plexus injury, 32.3 (95% CI, 3.8-278.2) for birth fractures and 4.4 (95% CI, 2.2-8.8) for hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy. The respective values in pregnancies with severe macrosomia were 4.3 (95% CI, 3.1-6.1), 2.9 (95% CI, 1.9-4.4), 3.1 (95% CI, 1.9-5.1), 28.7 (95% CI, 20.8-39.8), 73.9 (95% CI, 15.1-363.2), 87.2 (95% CI, 7.7-985.0) and 13.8 (95% CI, 5.2-36.8).
CONCLUSION: Macrosomia is associated with serious adverse perinatal outcomes. This study provides accurate estimates of risks to aid in pregnancy management.
Copyright © 2019 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. Copyright © 2019 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  brachial plexus injury; large-for-gestational age; macrosomia; obstetric sphincter injury; pregnancy complications; shoulder dystocia

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30938000     DOI: 10.1002/uog.20278

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0960-7692            Impact factor:   7.299


  7 in total

1.  Nomogram-based risk prediction of macrosomia: a case-control study.

Authors:  Jing Du; Xiaomei Zhang; Sanbao Chai; Xin Zhao; Jianbin Sun; Ning Yuan; Xiaofeng Yu; Qiaoling Zhang
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2022-05-05       Impact factor: 3.105

2.  Management of neonatal complications of macrosomia: A case report at a tertiary hospital in a developing country.

Authors:  Julius Nuwagaba; Darshit Dave
Journal:  Clin Case Rep       Date:  2022-01-20

3.  International versus national growth charts for identifying small and large-for-gestational age newborns: A population-based study in 15 European countries.

Authors:  Alice Hocquette; Mélanie Durox; Rachael Wood; Kari Klungsøyr; Katarzyna Szamotulska; Sylvan Berrut; Tonia Rihs; Theopisti Kyprianou; Luule Sakkeus; Aline Lecomte; Irisa Zile; Sophie Alexander; Jeannette Klimont; Henrique Barros; Miriam Gatt; Jelena Isakova; Béatrice Blondel; Mika Gissler; Jennifer Zeitlin
Journal:  Lancet Reg Health Eur       Date:  2021-07-15

4.  Macrosomia predictors and pregnancy outcomes in Gestational Diabetes patients: An observational study from Ha'il, Saudi Arabia.

Authors:  Nuzhat Parveen; Naveed Iqbal; Asma Batool; Tariq Mahmoud; Syeda Ali
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2022 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.340

5.  Binge alcohol drinking before pregnancy is closely associated with the development of macrosomia: Korean pregnancy registry cohort.

Authors:  Seul Koo; Ji Yeon Kim; Ji Hye Park; Gu Seob Roh; Nam Kyoo Lim; Hyun Young Park; Won-Ho Kim
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-07-12       Impact factor: 3.752

6.  Non-diabetic fetal macrosomia: outcomes of elective delivery versus expectant management.

Authors:  Gillian A Corbett; Samuel Hunter; Amina Javaid; Emma McNamee; Michael O'Connell; Stephen W Lindow; Aisling Martin
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2022-07-04       Impact factor: 2.089

7.  Epidemiology of Macrosomia in Korea: Growth and Development.

Authors:  Kee Hyun Cho; So Jin Yoon; Joohee Lim; Hoseon Eun; Min Soo Park; Kook In Park; Heui Seung Jo; Soon Min Lee
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2021-12-06       Impact factor: 2.153

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.