Literature DB >> 30937857

The kringle suture: maximizing tendon repair stability while limiting hardware utilization-description of the technique and preliminary results.

N Ivaldo1, T Mangano2, G Caione1, M Rossoni1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Arthroscopic repair currently represents the gold standard surgical treatment for rotator cuff tears, despite several aspects that are still matter of discussion between surgeons, and it is not clear yet what technique is better with respect to the others. Several evidences, however, support the assumption that the suture configuration is most important than the number of suture anchors used.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this work, we describe a new suture technique for arthroscopic supraspinatus tendon repair using a single double-loaded common suture anchor, and based on a continue and multi-passage suture configuration, with final gross resemblance to the nordic kringle pastries or to the kringle protein domain. Between June 2015 and July 2016, 44 patients (44 shoulders) were treated for supraspinatus tendon tear by means of the kringle suture. Of these, 36 patients have been evaluated from the clinical and radiographic site in the setting of this study, with a follow-up time ranging from 18 to 30 months.
RESULTS: During the follow-up period, no major complications were recorded. Two patients reported a transient postoperative stiffness, which completely resolved upon 6 months from surgery. All of the patients referred complete subjective satisfaction and return to their daylife activities without pain. No sign of radiographic subsidence of the suture anchors was found at the radiographic analysis.
CONCLUSION: The kringle suture technique is cost saving, easy to perform, versatile and provides excellent initial fixation strength as required for tendon to bone healing of the reinserted cuff.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Arthroscopic cuff repair; Kringle suture; Supraspinatus tendon repair

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30937857     DOI: 10.1007/s12306-019-00600-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg        ISSN: 2035-5114


  22 in total

1.  Comparable biomechanical results for a modified single-row rotator cuff reconstruction using triple-loaded suture anchors versus a suture-bridging double-row repair.

Authors:  Olaf Lorbach; Matthias Kieb; Florian Raber; Lüder C Busch; Dieter Kohn; Dietrich Pape
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2011-11-23       Impact factor: 4.772

2.  Biomechanical comparison of a single-row versus double-row suture anchor technique for rotator cuff repair.

Authors:  David H Kim; Neal S Elattrache; James E Tibone; Bong-Jae Jun; Sergai N DeLaMora; Ronald S Kvitne; Thay Q Lee
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2005-11-10       Impact factor: 6.202

3.  Single-row versus double-row arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: a prospective randomized clinical study.

Authors:  Andrea Grasso; Giuseppe Milano; Matteo Salvatore; Gianluca Falcone; Laura Deriu; Carlo Fabbriciani
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2008-11-01       Impact factor: 4.772

4.  A biomechanical analysis of controllable intraoperative variables affecting the strength of rotator cuff repairs at the suture-tendon interface.

Authors:  Brent A Ponce; Chad D Hosemann; Parthasarathy Raghava; Janet P Tate; Evan D Sheppard; Alan W Eberhardt
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2013-08-15       Impact factor: 6.202

5.  Ultrasound evaluation of arthroscopic full-thickness supraspinatus rotator cuff repair: single-row versus double-row suture bridge (transosseous equivalent) fixation. Results of a prospective, randomized study.

Authors:  Gary M Gartsman; Gregory Drake; T Bradley Edwards; Hussein A Elkousy; Steven M Hammerman; Daniel P O'Connor; Cyrus M Press
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2013-09-04       Impact factor: 3.019

Review 6.  Arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs: an anatomic and biomechanical rationale for different suture-anchor repair configurations.

Authors:  Brian J Cole; Neal S ElAttrache; Ammar Anbari
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 4.772

Review 7.  Clinical evidence shows no difference between single- and double-row repair for rotator cuff tears.

Authors:  Daniel J Reardon; Nicola Maffulli
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 4.772

Review 8.  Factors affecting rotator cuff healing.

Authors:  Nathan A Mall; Miho J Tanaka; Luke S Choi; George A Paletta
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2014-05-07       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  Mechanical strength of repairs of the rotator cuff.

Authors:  C Gerber; A G Schneeberger; M Beck; U Schlegel
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1994-05

Review 10.  Rotator cuff repair: a review of surgical techniques, animal models, and new technologies under development.

Authors:  Gabrielle Deprés-Tremblay; Anik Chevrier; Martyn Snow; Mark B Hurtig; Scott Rodeo; Michael D Buschmann
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2016-08-20       Impact factor: 3.019

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.