Manoj Shrestha1, Ulrike Nöth2, Ralf Deichmann2. 1. Brain Imaging Center (BIC), Goethe University Frankfurt, Schleusenweg 2-16, 60528, Frankfurt am Main, Germany. shrestha@med.uni-frankfurt.de. 2. Brain Imaging Center (BIC), Goethe University Frankfurt, Schleusenweg 2-16, 60528, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Alternative versions of echo-planar imaging (EPI) sequences with standard spin echo (SE) or stimulated echo acquisition mode (STEAM) preparations are proposed, allowing for improved signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), especially in high-resolution imaging. The suitability of the proposed sequences, dubbed "highly asymmetric SE-EPI" (HASE-EPI) and "highly asymmetric STEAM-EPI" (HASTEAM-EPI), is tested in vivo, for anatomical imaging with [Formula: see text] weighting and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI). MATERIALS AND METHODS: In HASE-EPI and HASTEAM-EPI, echo formation occurs prior to the EPI readout, rather than at k-space centre as in standard SE-EPI and STEAM-EPI. This allows for a constant preparation period, independent of the spatial resolution. The proposed sequences are compared to their standard counterparts, via simulations and experimentally via in vivo anatomical imaging and DWI. RESULTS: HASE-EPI and HASTEAM-EPI yield SNR improvements for large matrix sizes and fully sampled EPI readout. Simulations and in vivo results show a signal gain in HASE-EPI versus SE-EPI or HASTEAM-EPI versus STEAM-EPI for white and gray matter, particularly for higher spatial resolution with full readout in anatomical imaging and DWI. However, simulations also show that in the case of very long EPI-readout trains, HASE-EPI and HASTEAM-EPI are more prone to pixel broadening due to relaxation effects. DISCUSSION: In contrast to commonly used SE-EPI or STEAM-EPI, the proposed sequences facilitate the acquisition of anatomical imaging and DWI data with improved SNR, especially for full EPI readouts. However, the applicability of HASE-EPI and HASTEAM-EPI should be carefully assessed: while signal gains are less pronounced when using parallel imaging and/or reduced matrix sizes, there may be pixel broadening for very long EPI-readout trains.
OBJECTIVE: Alternative versions of echo-planar imaging (EPI) sequences with standard spin echo (SE) or stimulated echo acquisition mode (STEAM) preparations are proposed, allowing for improved signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), especially in high-resolution imaging. The suitability of the proposed sequences, dubbed "highly asymmetric SE-EPI" (HASE-EPI) and "highly asymmetric STEAM-EPI" (HASTEAM-EPI), is tested in vivo, for anatomical imaging with [Formula: see text] weighting and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI). MATERIALS AND METHODS: In HASE-EPI and HASTEAM-EPI, echo formation occurs prior to the EPI readout, rather than at k-space centre as in standard SE-EPI and STEAM-EPI. This allows for a constant preparation period, independent of the spatial resolution. The proposed sequences are compared to their standard counterparts, via simulations and experimentally via in vivo anatomical imaging and DWI. RESULTS: HASE-EPI and HASTEAM-EPI yield SNR improvements for large matrix sizes and fully sampled EPI readout. Simulations and in vivo results show a signal gain in HASE-EPI versus SE-EPI or HASTEAM-EPI versus STEAM-EPI for white and gray matter, particularly for higher spatial resolution with full readout in anatomical imaging and DWI. However, simulations also show that in the case of very long EPI-readout trains, HASE-EPI and HASTEAM-EPI are more prone to pixel broadening due to relaxation effects. DISCUSSION: In contrast to commonly used SE-EPI or STEAM-EPI, the proposed sequences facilitate the acquisition of anatomical imaging and DWI data with improved SNR, especially for full EPI readouts. However, the applicability of HASE-EPI and HASTEAM-EPI should be carefully assessed: while signal gains are less pronounced when using parallel imaging and/or reduced matrix sizes, there may be pixel broadening for very long EPI-readout trains.
Entities:
Keywords:
Asymmetric echo; Asymmetric imaging; Diffusion-weighted imaging; Short echo time; Signal-to-noise ratio
Authors: Mark A Griswold; Peter M Jakob; Robin M Heidemann; Mathias Nittka; Vladimir Jellus; Jianmin Wang; Berthold Kiefer; Axel Haase Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2002-06 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Stephen M Smith; Mark Jenkinson; Mark W Woolrich; Christian F Beckmann; Timothy E J Behrens; Heidi Johansen-Berg; Peter R Bannister; Marilena De Luca; Ivana Drobnjak; David E Flitney; Rami K Niazy; James Saunders; John Vickers; Yongyue Zhang; Nicola De Stefano; J Michael Brady; Paul M Matthews Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2004 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Eike Steidl; Maximilian Rauch; Elke Hattingen; Stella Breuer; Jan Rüdiger Schüre; Marike Grapengeter; Manoj Shrestha; Christian Foerch; Martin A Schaller-Paule Journal: Front Neurol Date: 2022-08-03 Impact factor: 4.086
Authors: Martin A Schaller-Paule; Eike Steidl; Manoj Shrestha; Ralf Deichmann; Helmuth Steinmetz; Alexander Seiler; Sriramya Lapa; Thorsten Steiner; Sven Thonke; Stefan Weidauer; Juergen Konczalla; Elke Hattingen; Christian Foerch Journal: Front Neurol Date: 2021-07-16 Impact factor: 4.003