Trends and prescription patterns of traditional Chinese medicine use among subjects with allergic diseases: A nationwide population-based study.

BACKGROUND: The alarmingly rising prevalence of allergic diseases has led to substantial healthcare and economic burdens worldwide. The integrated use of traditional Chinese medicines (TCM) and Western medicines has been common in treating subjects with allergic diseases in clinical practice in Taiwan. However, limited studies have been conducted to evaluate long-term trends and prescription patterns of TCM use among subjects with allergic diseases. Thus, we conducted a nationwide population-based study to characterize TCM use among subjects with allergic diseases.
METHODS: A total of 241,858 subjects with diagnosed atopic dermatitis, asthma or allergic rhinitis in the period of 2003-2012 were identified from the National Health Insurance Research Database (NHIRD) in Taiwan and included in this study. We assessed trends and prescribed patterns related to TCM (both single herbs and herbal formulas) among the study subjects over the 10-year study period.
RESULTS: The overall proportions of TCM use were 30.5%, 29.0% and 45.7% in subjects with atopic dermatitis, asthma and allergic rhinitis, respectively. We found increasing trends of TCM use among subjects having atopic dermatitis and asthma, with annual increase of 0.91% and 0.38%, respectively, over the 10-year study period while the proportion remained steadily high (from 46.6% in 2003 to 46.3% in 2012) among subjects having allergic rhinitis. Moreover, the number of hospitalization due to allergic diseases in TCM users was significantly smaller than that in non TCM users for all three allergic diseases.
CONCLUSION: A notable proportion (30%-50%) of subjects with allergic diseases in Taiwan has used TCM, with the highest proportion of TCM use found in subjects with allergic rhinitis, whereas increasing trends of TCM use are found among subjects with atopic dermatitis and asthma, respectively. Our results suggest that TCM use may help reduce the severe episodes of allergic diseases necessitating hospitalizations.

Introduction

Allergic diseases such as atopic dermatitis, asthma and allergic rhinitis have increased noticeably in recent decades and are emerging as a major clinical and public health issue not only in Taiwan, but also worldwide.1, 2, 3, 4 It has been documented by the World Allergy Organization (WAO) White Book on Allergy 2013 update that approximately 30–40% of the worldwide population is affected by one or more allergic diseases, such as atopic dermatitis, asthma, allergic rhinitis and food allergy etc. The increasing prevalence of allergic diseases during the past decades has also led to considerable economic, medical and social burdens.

It is long known that Western medicines, e.g., antihistamines, corticosteroids, leukotriene modifiers, beta2-agonists, and anticholinergics etc., have been widely administered to treat subjects with allergic diseases. However, available Western-medicine treatment for allergic diseases may only offer symptomatic relief, but is lack of curative efficacy. Thus, managing allergic diseases using conventional Western medicines has remained a major challenge.

On the other hand, there is a general impression among some people in Chinese society including Taiwan that traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) is better in curing the root of a disease and has milder adverse effects when compared to Western medicines. In addition, the lack of curative efficacy in Western medicines may explain, at least in part, why a considerable proportion of subjects with allergic diseases seek complementary and alternative treatment, specifically, TCM. TCM has been used for thousands of years in Asian countries, including China, Japan, Korea and Taiwan. However, trends and prescription patterns of TCM use in subjects with allergic diseases have been largely unexplored.

The National Health Insurance Program (NHIP) in Taiwan has launched since 1995, covering nearly 99.6% of the total population residing in Taiwan. Since 1996, TCM use has been reimbursed by the NHIP. In the present study, using data collected by the NHIP, we investigated 10-year trends and prescription patterns of TCM use in subjects with three common allergic diseases, specifically, atopic dermatitis, asthma and allergic rhinitis, from 2003 to 2012 in Taiwan.

Methods

Data source

In this study, we used registry data derived from the Longitudinal Health Insurance Database 2005 (LHID2005) composed of medical claims data, which are part of the National Health Insurance Research Database (NHIRD) in Taiwan. In brief, the NHIP, a government-run, single-payer program, has provided mandatory medical care to residents in Taiwan since 1995. The NHIRD contains reimbursement claims data collected by the NHIP, including demographic characteristics, outpatient and inpatient claims data and prescription records (both Western medicines and TCM). Previous studies have reported that enrollees representing nearly 99% of the total population in Taiwan. The LHID2005, a subset derived from the NHIRD, included 1,000,000 individuals (approximately 5% of the total population of Taiwan) and randomly sampled from the 2005 National Health Insurance Registry for Beneficiaries of the original NHIRD. As described in the following link (http://nhird.nhri.org.tw/en/Data_Subsets.html) – “There was no significant difference in the gender distribution (χ2 = 0.008, df = 1, P-value = 0.931) between the patients in the LHID2005 and the original NHIRD”, the information has provided supportive evidence that the LHID2005 was representative for the entire Taiwan population. The Institutional Review Board of the National Health Research Institutes, Taiwan approved this study protocol (the ethics approval reference number: EC1050302-E).

Study population

In the present study, subjects diagnosed with atopic dermatitis, asthma and allergic rhinitis in the period of 2003–2012 were included. In considering substantial degree of variation in seeking treatment among prevalent subjects, we excluded subjects who were diagnosed as atopic dermatitis, asthma and allergic rhinitis before 2003. We defined subjects with allergic disease(s) based on the International Classification of Diseases [ICD]-9-CM codes during the study period of 2003–2012. Diagnoses of three examined allergic diseases in this study were described as follow: i) atopic dermatitis defined as at least one inpatient or two outpatient medical claims records within a year (ICD-9 code = 691.8)11, 12; ii) asthma defined as at least one inpatient or two outpatient medical claims records within a year (ICD-9 code = 493); and iii) allergic rhinitis defined as at least one inpatient or two outpatient medical claims records within a year (ICD-9 = 477). The date of the second outpatient medical claims record or the date of one inpatient medical claims record were used for defining time to diagnosis of the three examined allergic diseases.

Assessment of traditional Chinese medicine use

Currently, the NHIP has reimbursed two kinds of Chinese herbal remedies: Chinese single herbs and Chinese herbal formulas. Each Chinese herbal formula is combined with two or more fixed proportions of Chinese single herbs, strictly followed the TCM classics. TCM use for the three allergic diseases evaluated in this study was directly recorded in the LHID2005. Thus, we identified Chinese herbal remedies based on prescription records from the LHID2005, then grouped study subjects as TCM users or non TCM users.

Data analysis

We calculated mean and corresponding standard deviation (SD), or counts and corresponding percentages for the baseline demographic and clinical characteristics of study subjects, including: age, sex, enrollee category as a proxy measure to represent the study subjects' socio-economic status, geographical area and healthcare utilization of outpatient and inpatient visits one year after the index date. Student's t-test was used for continuous variables and chi-square test was used for categorical variables, respectively, to compare demographic and clinical characteristics between subjects with and without TCM use. In addition to the corresponding statistical tests, we compared demographic and clinical characteristics between subjects with and without TCM use using standardized mean differences (SMDs), which were computed as the absolute difference in means or proportions divided by a pooled standard deviation in two groups.14, 15 Previous studies have reported that SMDs are not sensitive to sample size and more suitable in determining meaningful differences than traditional significance tests. SMDs less than 0.1 are considered as adequate balance for corresponding variables between groups. To investigate time trends for TCM use in each examined allergic disease, we first transformed the calendar year by subtracting 2003 from the year and dividing the results by 9. Thus, the transformed values were 0 for 2003 and 1 for 2012. Next, we performed linear regression analyses for evaluating 10-year time trends of TCM use for three examined allergic diseases (atopic dermatitis, asthma and allergic rhinitis) in this study. All of the analyses were performed using SAS version 8.2 (SAS institute, Cary, NC). P values less than 0.05 were declared to be statistically significant.

Results

A total of 241,858 subjects diagnosed with one or more allergic diseases including atopic dermatitis, asthma and allergic rhinitis in the period of 2003–2012 were included in this study and examined in the subsequent analyses. Among those, there were 28,771 subjects with atopic dermatitis, 71,838 subjects with asthma, and 191,851 subjects with allergic rhinitis. Fig. 1 shows the detailed flow chart regarding identification for the study subjects. For the percentages of TCM use, we found that 30.5% subjects with atopic dermatitis were TCM users; 29.0% subjects with asthma were TCM users; and 45.7% subjects with allergic rhinitis were TCM users.

Fig. 1

Flowchart of study subjects identified from the Longitudinal Health Insurance Database 2005 (LHID2005) from 2003 to 2012 in Taiwan.

Table 1 presents the distributions of baseline and clinical characteristics included age, sex, enrollee category, geographical area and healthcare utilization of outpatient and inpatient visits one year after the index date. The distributions of age, sex and enrollee category (except for atopic dermatitis) are different between subjects with and without TCM use in three allergic diseases examined in this study (all SMDs more than or equal to 0.1 for age and sex in three allergic diseases; enrollee category: SMD = 0.08 for atopic dermatitis, SMD = 0.10 for asthma, and SMD = 0.11 for allergic rhinitis). There was no difference in distributions of geographic area in three examined allergic diseases (all SMDs < 0.1). The mean age and corresponding standard deviation at diagnosis of allergic diseases in subjects with TCM use was 32.81 ± 25.48 years, while the group of subjects without TCM use was 32.33 ± 21.37 years. Females were predominant in TCM users for all three allergic diseases. In terms of healthcare utilization one year after the index date, subjects with TCM use had more outpatient visits in three examined allergic diseases (all SMDs > 0.1), and less inpatient visits, compared to the group of subjects without TCM use in asthma and allergic rhinitis, but not atopic dermatitis (number of hospitalization: SMD = 0.06 for atopic dermatitis; SMD = 0.11 for asthma; and SMD = 0.10 for allergic rhinitis) (Table 1).

Table 1

Demographic characteristics of patients with diagnosed atopic dermatitis, asthma and allergic rhinitis in the period of 2003–2012, grouped by status of TCM use.

	Atopic dermatitis (n = 28,771)					Asthma (n = 71,838)					Allergic rhinitis (n = 191,851)
	TCM use	No TCM use	χ2,b	P	SMDd	TCM use	No TCM use	χ2	P	SMD	TCM use	No TCM use	χ2	P	SMD
	(n = 8772)	(n = 19,999)				(n = 20,866)	(n = 50,972)				(n = 87,649)	(n = 104,202)
	N (%)	N (%)				N (%)	N (%)				N (%)	N (%)
Age, years
Age<10	1584 (18.06)	5637 (28.19)	488.2	<10−5	0.29	5272 (25.27)	17,877 (35.07)	943.7	<10−5	0.25	15,223 (17.37)	25,446 (24.42)	3290.1	<10−5	0.27
10 ≤ age<30	2414 (27.52)	4639 (23.20)				3155 (15.12)	6775 (13.29)				28,950 (33.03)	27,532 (26.42)
30 ≤ age<50	2408 (27.45)	3877 (19.39)				4658 (22.32)	7643 (14.99)				26,610 (30.36)	24,987 (23.98)
Age≥50	2366 (26.97)	5846 (29.23)				7781 (37.29)	18,677 (36.64)				16,866 (19.24)	26,237 (25.18)
Sex
Females	5343 (60.91)	10,061 (50.31)	275.5	<10−5	0.22	11,649 (55.83)	24,163 (47.40)	420.2	<10−5	0.17	49,162 (56.09)	49,675 (47.67)	1350.6	<10−5	0.17
Males	3429 (39.09)	9938 (49.69)				9217 (44.17)	26,809 (52.60)				38,487 (43.91)	54,527 (52.33)
Enrollee category
I	647 (7.38)	1214 (6.07)	38.6	<10−5	0.08	1476 (7.07)	2962 (5.81)	138.3	<10−5	0.10	7367 (8.41)	7054 (6.77)	594.6	<10−5	0.11
II	2594 (29.57)	5677 (28.39)				5723 (27.43)	13,307 (26.11)				30,088 (34.33)	32,947 (31.62)
III	2324 (26.49)	5331 (26.66)				6291 (30.15)	14,454 (28.36)				20,969 (23.92)	24,837 (23.84)
IV	1022 (11.65)	2737 (13.69)				2676 (12.82)	7299 (14.32)				8798 (10.04)	12,925 (12.40)
Other	2185 (24.91)	5040 (25.20)				4700 (22.52)	12,950 (25.41)				20,427 (23.31)	26,439 (25.37)
Geographical area
Urban	2661 (30.34)	6043 (30.22)	24.3	2.2 × 10−5	0.06	5902 (28.29)	14,269 (27.99)	11.9	7.9 × 10−3	0.03	26,216 (29.91)	32,364 (31.06)	81.2	<10−5	0.07
Suburban	4954 (56.48)	10,918 (54.59)				11,885 (56.96)	28,667 (56.24)				51,184 (58.40)	58,779 (56.41)
Rural	775 (8.83)	1937 (9.69)				1957 (9.38)	5061 (9.93)				6098 (6.96)	7807 (7.49)
Other	382 (4.35)	1101 (5.51)				1122 (5.38)	2975 (5.84)				4151 (4.74)	5252 (5.04)
	TCM use	No TCM use	tc	P	SMD	TCM use	No TCM use	t	P	SMD	TCM use	No TCM use	t	P	SMD
	Mean ± SD	Mean ± SD				Mean ± SD	Mean ± SD				Mean ± SD	Mean ± SD
Health utilizationa
No. of inpatient visits	0.18 ± 0.75	0.23 ± 0.80	4.9	<10−5	0.06	0.36 ± 0.94	0.47 ± 1.14	13.4	<10−5	0.11	0.13 ± 0.52	0.19 ± 0.66	22.7	<10−5	0.10
No. of outpatient visits	31.43 ± 19.75	25.07 ± 18.34	25.7	<10−5	0.33	34.38 ± 20.24	26.12 ± 17.95	51.3	<10−5	0.43	26.85 ± 17.33	21.92 ± 15.82	64.7	<10−5	0.30

Abbreviation: TCM: traditional Chinese medicine; SD: standard deviation; SMD: standardized mean difference.

Health utilization is calculated based on one year after the index date.

Critical values were calculated by chi-squared test.

Critical values were calculated by Student's t-test.

SMD more than or equal to 0.1 between two groups is marked in bold.

We examined the time trends of TCM use in subjects with atopic dermatitis, asthma and allergic rhinitis, separately, over the study period of 2003–2012. The overall proportions of TCM use were 30.5%, 29.0% and 45.7% in subjects with atopic dermatitis, asthma and allergic rhinitis, respectively. Significantly increasing trends in TCM use were observed among subjects with atopic dermatitis and asthma, individually, from 2003 to 2012 (Fig. 2). Specifically, the proportion of TCM use among subjects with atopic dermatitis increased from 26.6% in 2003 to 34.7% in 2012, with a β of 0.91, indicating that there was a 0.91% annual increase of TCM use. The proportion of TCM use among subjects with asthma increased from 29.4% in 2003 to 31.9% in 2012, with a β of 0.38, indicating that there was a 0.38% annual increase of TCM use. On the other hand, the proportions of TCM use for subjects with allergic rhinitis ranged from 46.6% in 2003 to 46.3% in 2012, without a significant trend change over the 10-year study period (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2

Time trends of TCM use among subjects with atopic dermatitis, asthma and allergic rhinitis, separately, in the period of 2003–2012.

The top 10 TCM single herbs and herbal formulas for treating atopic dermatitis, asthma and allergic rhinitis, respectively, were shown in Table 2, Table 3, Table 4. Among subjects with atopic dermatitis, three most commonly prescribed single herbs were Huang-qin (1.81%), Gan-cao (1.63%), and Yan-hu-suo (1.63%); and three most commonly prescribed herbal formulas were Xiao-feng-san (2.83%), Jia-wei-xiao-yao-san (2.63%), and Xin-yi-qing-fei-tang (2.49%) (Table 2). Among subjects with asthma, three most commonly prescribed single herbs were Bei-mu (2.49%), Jie-geng (2.32%), and Ku-xing-ren (2.3%); and three most commonly prescribed herbal formulas were Xiao-ching-lung-tang (3.37%), Ma-xing-gan-shi-tang (3.31%), and Xin-yi-qing-fei-tang (2.93%) (Table 3). Among subjects with allergic rhinitis, three most commonly prescribed single herbs were Jie-geng (2.07%), Bai-zhi (1.99%), and Huang-qin (1.94%); and three most commonly prescribed herbal formulas were Xin-yi-qing-fei-tang (4.13%), Xiao-ching-lung-tang (3.50%), and Xin-yi-san (3.15%) (Table 4).

Table 2

The top 10 commonly prescribed single herbs and herbal formulas for treating patients with atopic dermatitis in 2003–2012.

Single herbs
Pin-yin name	Latin name	Botanical plant name	Therapeutic indication	N	%
Huang-qin	Radix Scutellariae	Scutellaria baicalensis Georgi	Clear heat and dry dampness, purge fire, relieve toxicity, cool blood and stop bleeding.	1204	1.81
Gan-cao	Radix Glycyrrhizae	Glycyrrhiza uralensis Fisch.	Tonify qi of heart and spleen, dispel phlegm, relieve cough and dyspnea, relieve spasm and pain, clear heat, relieve toxicity, and harmonize property of medicine.	1085	1.63
Yan-hu-suo	Rhizoma Corydalis	Corydalis yanhusuo W. T. Wang	Activate blood, promote flow of qi, and alleviate pain.	1084	1.63
Jie-geng	Radix Platycodonis	Platycodon grandiflorum (Jacq.) A. DC.	Ventilate lung, dispel phlegm, relieve sore throat, and expel pus.	1044	1.57
Chan-tui	Periostracum Cicadae	Cryptotympana pustulata Fabricius	Disperse wind-heat, relieve sore throat and produce sound, relieve itching, promote eruption, improve vision and remove nebula, extinguish wind and relieve spasms.	1004	1.51
Bei-mu	Bulbus Fritillariae Cirrhosae or Bulbus Fritillariae Thunbergii	Fritillaria chrrhosa D. Don or Fritillaria thunbergii Miq.	Clear and resolve heat-phlegm, moisten and resolve dry phlegm, stop cough, dissipate nodulation and resolve swelling and cure abscess	1000	1.50
Lian-qiao	Forsythiae Fructus	Forsythia suspensa (Thunb.) Vahl.	Clear heat and remove toxicity, disperse wind-heat, and clear heart-heat.	974	1.47
Bai-zhi	Radix Angelicae Dahuricae	Angelica dahurica (Hoffm.) Benth. & Hook.f. ex Franch. & Sav.	Expel wind and release exterior, alleviate pain, relieve stuffy nose, dry dampness and stop leucorrhea.	968	1.46
Mu-dan-pi	Cortex Moutan	Paeonia suffruticosa Andr.	Clear heat and cool blood, activate blood and resolve stasis, and reduce deficiency heat.	862	1.30
Ku-xing-ren	Semen Armeniacae Amarae	Prunus armeniaca L.	Relieve cough and dyspnea, moisten intestines for relaxing bowels.	855	1.29

Table 3

The top 10 commonly prescribed single herbs and herbal formulas for treating patients with asthma in 2003–2012.

Single herbs
Pin-yin name	Latin name	Botanical plant name	Therapeutic indication	N	%
Bei-mu	Bulbus Fritillariae Cirrhosae or Bulbus Fritillariae Thunbergii	Fritillaria chrrhosa D. Don or Fritillaria thunbergii Miq.	Clear and resolve heat-phlegm, moisten and resolve dry-phlegm, stop cough, dissipate nodulation and resolve swelling, and cure abscess	3974	2.49
Jie-geng	Radix Platycodonis	Platycodon grandiflorum (Jacq.) A. DC.	Ventilate lung, dispel phlegm, relieve sore throat, and expel pus.	3704	2.32
Ku-xing-ren	Semen Armeniacae Amarae	Prunus armeniaca L.	Relieve cough and dyspnea, and moisten intestines for relaxing bowels.	3675	2.30
Huang-qin	Radix Scutellariae	Scutellaria baicalensis Georgi	Clear heat and dry dampness, purge fire, relieve toxicity, cool blood and stop bleeding.	2940	1.84
Gan-cao	Radix Glycyrrhizae	Glycyrrhiza uralensis Fisch.	Tonify qi of heart and spleen, dispel phlegm, relieve cough and dyspnea, relieve spasm and pain, clear heat, relieve toxicity, and harmonize property of medicine.	2655	1.66
Yu-xing-cao	Houttuyniae Herba	Houttuynia cordata Thunb.	Clear heat and remove toxicity, cure abscess and discharge pus, clear lung heat, clear heat and remove dampness.	2324	1.45
Yan-hu-suo	Rhizoma Corydalis	Corydalis yanhusuo W. T. Wang	Activate blood, promote flow of qi, and alleviate pain.	2317	1.45
Bai-zhi	Radix Angelicae Dahuricae	Angelica dahurica (Hoffm.) Benth. & Hook.f. ex Franch. & Sav.	Expel wind and release exterior, alleviate pain, relieve stuffy nose, dry dampness and stop leucorrhea.	2255	1.41
Mai-men-dong	Radix Ophiopogonis	Ophiopogon japonicus (L.f.) Ker-Gawl.	Nourish yin of stomach, lung and heart, clear heat of stomach, lung and heart, calm heart and induce tranquilization.	2121	1.33
Hou-po	Magnoliae Officinalis Cortex	Magnolia officinalis Rehd. et Wils.	Dry dampness, move qi, and relieve dyspnea.	2004	1.25

Table 4

The top 10 commonly prescribed single herbs and herbal formulas for treating patients with allergic rhinitis in 2003–2012.

Single herbs
Pin-yin name	Latin name	Botanical plant name	Therapeutic indication	N	%
Jie-geng	Radix Platycodonis	Platycodon grandiflorum (Jacq.) A. DC.	Ventilate lung, dispel phlegm, relieve sore throat, and expel pus.	16,279	2.07
Bai-zhi	Radix Angelicae Dahuricae	Angelica dahurica (Hoffm.) Benth. & Hook.f. ex Franch. & Sav.	Expel wind and release exterior, alleviate pain, relieve stuffy nose, dry dampness and stop leucorrhea.	15,642	1.99
Huang-qin	Radix Scutellariae	Scutellaria baicalensis Georgi	Clear heat and dry dampness, purge fire and relieve toxicity, cool blood and stop bleeding.	15,263	1.94
Bei-mu	Bulbus Fritillariae Cirrhosae or Bulbus Fritillariae Thunbergii	Fritillaria chrrhosa D. Don or Fritillaria thunbergii Miq.	Clear and resolve heat-phlegm, moisten and resolve dry-phlegm, stop cough, dissipate nodulation and resolve swelling and cure abscess	14,443	1.84
Cang-er-zi	Fructus Xanthii	Xanthium sibiricum Patr.	Disperse wind-cold, relieve nasal obstruction and stop pain.	13,146	1.67
Ku-xing-ren	Semen Armeniacae Amarae	Prunus armeniaca L.	Relieve cough and dyspnea, and moisten intestines for relaxing bowels.	12,857	1.64
Gan-cao	Radix Glycyrrhizae	Glycyrrhiza uralensis Fisch.	Tonify qi of heart and spleen, dispel phlegm, relieve cough and dyspnea, relieve spasm and pain, clear heat and relieve toxicity, and harmonize property of medicine.	12,413	1.58
Yu-xing-cao	Houttuyniae Herba	Houttuynia cordata Thunb.	Clear heat and remove toxicity, cure abscess and discharge pus, clear lung heat, clear heat and remove dampness.	11,725	1.49
Chan-tui	Periostracum Cicadae	Cryptotympana pustulata Fabricius	Disperse wind-heat, relieve sore throat and produce sound, relieve itching and promote eruption, improve vision and remove nebula, and extinguish wind and relieve spasms.	11,543	1.47
Yan-hu-suo	Rhizoma Corydalis	Corydalis yanhusuo W. T. Wang	Activate blood, promote flow of qi, and alleviate pain.	10,987	1.40

Discussion

This study identified 10-year trends and prescription patterns of TCM use among subjects with allergic diseases over the study period of 2003–2012 in Taiwan. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study simultaneously evaluating 10-year trends and prescription patterns of TCM use in subjects with three common allergic diseases, specifically, atopic dermatitis, asthma and allergic rhinitis. Our study demonstrated that considerable proportions of patients with allergic diseases (30.5% for atopic dermatitis, 29% for asthma, and 45.7% for allergic rhinitis, respectively) in Taiwan had used TCM. The results showed increasing trends of TCM use over the 10-year study period among subjects with atopic dermatitis and asthma, respectively. When we assessed the proportions of TCM use among three examined allergic diseases, the highest proportion of TCM use was observed in subjects with allergic rhinitis, but the trend remained steady over the 10-year study period. Taken together, a notable proportion (30–50%) of subjects with allergic diseases in Taiwan had used TCM. Moreover, our results indicated that the number of inpatient visits in subjects with TCM use was significantly smaller than that in subjects without TCM use for all three examined allergic diseases.

To date, the trends and prescription patterns of TCM use in subjects with allergic diseases remain largely unclear. Our study demonstrated that considerable proportions of subjects with allergic diseases (30.5% for atopic dermatitis, 29% for asthma, and 45.7% for allergic rhinitis, respectively) had used TCM. Of note, we found increasing trends of TCM use among subjects with atopic dermatitis and asthma, respectively. Particularly, we observed a 0.91% annual increase for subjects with atopic dermatitis and a 0.38% annual increase for subjects with asthma, respectively. On the other hand, the proportions of TMC use for subjects with allergic rhinitis remained steadily high (from 46.6% in 2003 to 46.3% in 2012) over the 10-year study period. The reasons for the observed increasing trends of TCM use in three examined allergic diseases in Taiwan remain unclear but it may reflect common beliefs that TCM use may potentially “cure the root of allergic diseases” or “cut the tail of allergic diseases”. Besides, there is a general impression among some people in Chinese society including Taiwan that TCM use tends to have milder adverse effects, though with slower clinical effects than Western medicines.

Previous studies have reported the therapeutic effects of TCM on allergic diseases.17, 18 For example, Chen et al examined whether TCM use affected combined use of corticosteroid among children with atopic dermatitis and found that TCM use reduced the number of corticosteroid prescriptions (both topical and systemic) among children with atopic dermatitis within one-year follow-up. The results from the Hung et al study have suggested that asthmatic children receiving adjuvant treatment with integrated TCM decreased frequency of emergency room visits and hospital admissions. However, the concern related to low certainty for efficacy of TCM use has been reported by previous studies.19, 20, 21 Thus, further investigation in making conclusive evidence for efficacy of TCM on allergic diseases would be warranted.

In parallel, pharmacological effects of single herbs and herbal formulas on three examined allergic diseases have been reported by several studies. First, three major pharmacological effects for TCM in treating subjects with atopic dermatitis have been documented, including anti-inflammation, reduction of histamine release, and anti-oxidation, respectively.17, 22 For example, Cheng et al investigated treatment effect of Xiao-feng-san, the top one prescribed herbal formula for treating subjects with atopic dermatitis in this study. Their results suggested that Xiao-feng-san might be an alternative therapeutic choice for subjects with severe and extensive atopic dermatitis. Second, both observational and animal studies have indicated that anti-asthmatic activity of TCM was through inhibiting bronchoconstriction and the migration of eosinophils to airway, and reducing airway hyper-responsiveness via regulating the Th2 cells.23, 24, 25, 26, 27 For instance, Wang et al demonstrated that Xiao-ching-lung-tang, the top one prescribed herbal formula for treating subjects with asthma in this study, has anti-inflammatory, anti-airway remodeling, and immune regulatory effects in their chronic asthmatic murine model. Previous studies have further indicated that pharmacological effects of TCM for treating allergic diseases were not only immune-modulatory effects, but also anti-inflammatory effect.29, 30 A randomized double blind study has reported that Xin-yi-san, one of the top 10 commonly prescribed herbal formulas in treating subjects with allergic rhinitis in the present study, has pharmacological effects on attenuating clinical symptoms of patients with perennial allergic rhinitis and exerting diverse immunomodulatory effects, such as suppression of serum immunoglobulin E levels and enhanced production of interleukin (IL)-10, IL-8, and soluble intercellular adhesion molecule (sICAM). Yang et al evaluated potential mechanisms regarding treatment effect of Bu-zhong-yi-qi-tang, also one of the top 10 commonly prescribed herbal formulas in treating subjects with allergic rhinitis in the present study, in patients with perennial allergic rhinitis. Their results suggested that Bu-zhong-yi-qi-tang played an anti-inflammation role through suppressing prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) and leukotriene C4 (LTC4).

Of note, we have found notably extent of the top 10 commonly prescribed TCM (both single herbs and herbal formulas) among these three allergic diseases are the same. For example, Huang-qin is the top one single herbs prescribed in subjects with atopic dermatitis, the top four single herbs prescribed in subjects with asthma, and the top three single herbs prescribed in subjects with allergic rhinitis; whereas Xin-yi-qing-fei-tang is the top three herbal formula prescribed in subjects with atopic dermatitis, the top three herbal formula prescribed in subjects with asthma, and the top one herbal formula prescribed in subjects with allergic rhinitis. The observed results may be partly supported by the following explanations. According to the visceral manifestation theory in TCM, all these three allergic diseases are related to the same visceral, “lung”. It is known that “lung” is a pair of organs locating in the thoracic cavity above the diaphragm. It controls respiration, dominates “qi” (the circulating life force whose existence and properties are the basis of traditional Chinese medicine and philosophy), governs diffusion and depurative down-bearing and regulates the waterways, therefore, is closely related to the function of the nose and skin surface. It is different from the view of Western medicines that both allergic rhinitis and asthma are belonged to respiratory system whereas atopic dermatitis is belonged to dermatological field. In addition, epidemiological data documents that coexistence of atopic dermatitis, asthma and allergic rhinitis is commonly occurred in the same subject, suggesting these allergic diseases share common causal mechanisms. Furthermore, previous studies have reported that Scutellariae radix (Latin name of Huang-qin) attenuates immunological responses in a mouse model of atopic dermatitis, mainly through decreasing IL-5 levels; modulates ovalbumin (OVA)-induced airway inflammation through suppressing IL-4/Stat6 signaling in a murine model of asthma; and baicalin, another component extracted from Scutellariae radix, effectively reduce allergic response in an OVA-induced allergic rhinitis animal model.34, 35, 36 Findings from previous studies have lent further support for the observed overlapping prescriptions of TCM in three allergic diseases investigated in this study.

Some caveats in this study should be noted. First, detailed information on clinical symptoms and laboratory reports are not available in the NHRID. But this issue should be undifferentiated between subjects with and without TCM use. Second, the NHIP in Taiwan only reimburses granular or powder forms of TCM herbs and formulas recording in the “Taiwan Herbal Pharmacopeia” that is published by Taiwan's Ministry of Health and Welfare (https://www.mohw.gov.tw/dl-10568-0efff195-8aff-4f6a-b19f-c18fbbf8dfb0.html). On the other hand, TCM in herbal form and herbal folk medicine are not reimbursed by the NHIP and are not included in this study. Therefore, it is likely that the prevalence of TCM use in three examined allergic diseases may be underestimated. Third, our results may or may not be generalizable, as the common prescription knowledge base among licensed TCM physicians might vary across countries. As such, caution should be taken when interpreting the results in this study. Fourth, the big standard deviations of age at diagnosis of allergic diseases in subjects with or without TCM use were noticed. Since we did not exclude study subjects based on their age, both children and adults were included in this study. It was likely a result of the observed big standard deviations.

Conclusion

In conclusion, a notable proportion (30–50%) of subjects with allergic diseases in Taiwan has used TCM, with the highest proportion of TCM use in subjects with allergic rhinitis, whereas increasing trends of TCM use are found among subjects with atopic dermatitis and asthma, respectively. Moreover, our results suggest that TCM use may help reduce severe episodes of these three allergic diseases that necessitate hospitalizations. Further investigation would be merited to better understand the efficacy and safety of TCM, particularly, potential interactions with Western medicines.

Declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The Institutional Review Board of the National Health Research Institutes, Taiwan, approved this study protocol.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Availability of data and material

Not applicable.

Funding

HJT and TCY are supported in part by grants from the Ministry of Science and Technology, National Health Research Institutes, and Chang Gung Memorial Hospital (PI: HJT, MOST 103-2314-B-400-004-MY3, MOST 107-2314-B-400-031-MY3, PH-105-SP-05, PH-105-SP-04, and PH-106-PP-08; PI: TCY, MOST 103-2314-B-182-030, MOST 104-2314-B-182-046-MY2, MOST 106-2314-B-182-051-MY3, CORPG3H0101, CORPG3F0361, CMRPG3F1711, CORPG3F0081 and CMRPG3E1201).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Authors' contributions

Tsung-Chieh Yao and Hui-Ju Tsai conceptualized, designed and supervised the study; raised funding for the study and staff working on the project, assisted in data analysis, interpreted the results and drafted the manuscript. Ya-Wen Huang performed data analysis, assisted in data collection, interpreted the results, and drafted the manuscript. Pei-Ying Lin, Chun-Hui Chu and Fang-Yu Chang provided intellectual inputs and assisted in data analysis and results interpretation. All authors contributed to the interpretation and discussion of the results; read and approved the final article.