| Literature DB >> 30937029 |
Gayrat Maratovich Kariev1, Ulugbek Maksudovich Asadullaev1, Temur Anvarovich Duschanov1, Shavkat Orzikulovich Rasulov1, Dilshod Muhammad Valievich Mamadaliev1, Dilshod Nayimovich Khodjimetov1.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The occurrence of obstructive hydrocephalus (ObH) as sequelae of deep midline brain tumors (third and lateral ventricles, thalamic, pineal region, brainstem, and fourth ventricle) can be estimated up to 90% of cases. We believe that the mamillopontine distance (MPD) - the distance between the lower surface of the mammillary body and the upper surface of the pons in the sagittal images - can be a sufficiently reliable alternative to the Evans' index (EI) for the diagnosis of ObH. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The results of mamillopontine distance (MPD), Evans' index (EI), and angle of corpus callosum (ACC) measurement of 43 patients with non-communicative hydrocephalus were analyzed compared with results of 30 people without brain pathology.Entities:
Keywords: Brain tumor; Evans’ index; mamillopontine distance; neuro-oncology; obstructive hydrocephalus
Year: 2019 PMID: 30937029 PMCID: PMC6417336 DOI: 10.4103/ajns.AJNS_79_18
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Asian J Neurosurg
Figure 1Types of linear measurement methods on magnetic resonance imaging images: (a) mamillopontine distance; (b) angle of corpus callosum; (c) Evans’ index; (d) periventricular edema
The average values of IE, MPD, ACC, PvE, OD and KS in all patients and control group (Mean±standard deviation). The maximum and minimum values are in brackets
| IE | MPD | ACC | PvE | OD | KS | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All patients ( | 0.299±0.005 (0.203-0.378) | 3.4±0.3 (0.0-8.8) | 97.1±3.3 (45.3-128.1) | 6.9±0.7 (0.6-22.0) | 2.2±0.2 (0.0-5.0) | 68.6±1.4 (50-80) |
| Children ( | 0.295±0.009 (0.203-0.344) | 2.6±0.6 (0.0-7.4) | 87.4±6.1 (45.3-128.1) | 8.3±1.1 (0.6-20.9) | 2.4±0.4 (0.0-4.0) | 65.6±1.6 (50-70) |
| Adults ( | 0.302±0.008 (0.221-0.378) | 3.9±0.4 (0.5-8.8) | 102.9±3.4 (70.2-128.1) | 6.0±0.9 (1.3-22.0) | 2.0±0.3 (0.0-5.0) | 70.4±1.9 (50-80) |
| Control ( | 0.242±0.003 (0.202-0.279) | 9.8±0.1 (9.0-11.8) | 125.3±1.2 (106.3-136.8) | 0.0 (0) | 0.0 (0) | 100 (100) |
Results of the statistical significance of differences in mean values between groups with pathologies and control (t-test of Student)
| IE | MPD | ACC | PvE | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| All patients ( | ||||
| Children ( | ||||
| Adults ( |
Results of the correlation analysis of Spearman's morphometric data (2-sided)
| IE | MPD | ACC | PvE | OD | KS | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IE | 1 | |||||
| MPD | 1 | |||||
| ACC | 1 | |||||
| PvE | 1 | |||||
| OD | 1 | |||||
| KS | 1 |
Note: **Correlation is significant at the level of 0.01 (2-sided). *Correlation is significant at the level of 0.05 (2-sided).
Figure 2The values of the Evans’ index and the mamillopontine distance of each examined person in the control group and in the group with occlusive hydrocephalus. The dotted line shows the mamillopontine distance (=9.0 mm) and the Evans index (=0.30)