Potential of Aegilops sp. for Improvement of Grain Processing and Nutritional Quality in Wheat (Triticum aestivum).

Wheat is one of the most important staple crops in the world and good source of calories and nutrition. Its flour and dough have unique physical properties and can be processed to make unique products like bread, cakes, biscuits, pasta, noodles etc., which is not possible from other staple crops. Due to domestication, the genetic variability of the genes coding for different economically important traits in wheat is narrow. This genetic variability can be increased by utilizing its wild relatives. Its closest relative, genus Aegilops can be an important source of new alleles. Aegilops has played a very important role in evolution of tetraploid and hexaploid wheat. It consists of 22 species with C, D, M, N, S, T and U genomes with high allelic diversity relative to wheat. Its utilization for wheat improvement for various abiotic and biotic stresses has been reported by various scientific publications. Here in, for the first time, we review the potential of Aegilops for improvement of processing and nutritional traits in wheat. Among processing quality related gluten proteins; high molecular weight glutenins (HMW GS), being easiest to study have been explored in highest number of accessions or lines i.e., 681 belonging to 13 species and selected ones like Ae. searsii, Ae. geniculata and Ae. longissima have been linked with improved bread making quality of wheat. Gliadins and low molecular weight glutenins (LMW GS) have also been extensively explored for wheat improvement and Ae. umbellulata specific LMW GS have been linked with wheat bread making quality improvement. Aegilops has been explored for seed texture diversity and proteins like puroindolins (Pin) and grain softness proteins (GSP). For nutrition quality improvement, it has been screened for essential micronutrients like Fe, Zn, phytochemicals like carotenoids and dietary fibers like arabinoxylan and β-glucan. Ae. kotschyi and Ae. biuncialis transfer in wheat have been associated with higher Fe, Zn content. In this article we have tried to compile information available on exploration of nutritional and processing quality related traits in Aegilops section and their utilization for wheat improvement by different approaches.

Introduction

Some of the most important cereal crops in the world are the members of the grass (Poaceae) family and belong to three major subfamilies – Pooideae, Oryzoideae and Panicoideae. These subfamilies diverged from a common ancestor around 50–70 million years ago (Bolot et al., 2009) (Figure 1A). Genus Aegilops is the closest relative of wheat followed by rye, barley, oats and brome in the Pooideae subfamily, rice in Oryzoideae, millets, sorghum and maize in Panicoideae (Figure 1A). Among the Pooideae, wheat (Triticum L.) is one of the major staple foods in the world. Due to its unique flour composition and viscoelastic properties, wheat is more suitable for industrialized food production than any other crop. Recently, demand for wheat based convenience foods (fast, ready to eat, frozen etc.) have increased due to the rise in urban population and changing lifestyles. Therefore, the end product quality of wheat has become important. With an increasing concern for texture and taste, there have been a lot of challenges for breeders to develop cultivars that satisfy specific end product requirements. Nutrition is another important aspect of wheat research. There are approximately two billion people in the world that suffer from nutrient deficiency also known as hidden hunger (World Health Organization, 2006). Since wheat provides around one fifth of calorific input to people across the world (Food and Agriculture Organization of United Nations [FAO], 2014), enhancing its nutritive value becomes of great importance.

Figure 1

(A) Evolutionary relationship among different cereals. Aegilops is the closest relative of wheat. Divergence times from a common ancestor are indicated on the branches of the phylogenetic tree in million years (MYA). Modified from Bolot et al. (2009). (B) Hypothesized evolution of wheat and species of Aegilops. Seven different genomes of Aegilops evolved from common ancestor (color coded). Colored dash arrows indicate the involvement of species for formation of other species of Aegilops. Blue colored dash dot arrows indicate hypothetical involvement of species. Hypothetical wheat evolution is also explained, cross between Triticum urartu and Ae. speltoides led to formation of Triticum turgidum which further hybridized with Ae. tauschii to form cultivated Triticum aestivum. Modified from Meimberg et al. (2009).

A lot of breeding programs have been initiated to select or develop varieties with improved nutrient content and specific end product quality. The existing germplasm of wheat have been extensively explored for traits related to end product quality and nutrition. The Green revolution has resulted in the development of high yielding and disease resistant varieties and most of the varieties grown today consist of an assembly of genes pyramided by breeders (Lopes et al., 2015). The breeding programs thus have relied on limited number of parent lines for development of wheat germplasm. A report has suggested that due to this genetic bottleneck the population size of wheat has been reduced by 6% (Cavanagh et al., 2013). This narrow genetic diversity often limits the improvement of many traits in wheat. Therefore, the need to explore secondary and tertiary gene pools of wheat has grown. Secondary and tertiary gene pools of wheat mainly consist of wild varieties that are outstanding sources of genetic variability. The secondary gene pool of wheat mainly consists of polyploid Triticum and some of Aegilops species that share at least one of the A, B and D genomes of hexaploid wheat. The tertiary gene pool consists of wild species with genomes other than A, B and D of wheat. The relationship within and between Aegilops and Triticum has been a matter of debate and many classification systems exist (Kilian et al., 2011). The latest monograph of Van Slageren (1994) which is based on morphological studies is mostly followed for classification and nomenclature of Aegilops and same has been followed in this review article. For wheat the classification system by Dorofeev et al. (1979) is mainly followed. The Aegilops genus consists of 11 diploid, 10 tetraploid and 2 hexaploid species (Figure 1B). Species of Aegilops occur in Eurasia and North America, but most species are found near the center of origin, the Fertile Crescent in the Middle East, and around the Mediterranean Sea (Figure 2). These species consist of C, D, M, N, S, T and U genomes which have evolved from a common ancestor (Figure 1B) and can be used to incorporate genetic material from the wider gene pool into newly developed cultivars of wheat, thus increasing its genetic diversity.

Figure 2

World wide distribution of Aegilops species. Species of Aegilops are mainly distributed in Eurasia and North America with highest density of occurrence in Fertile Crescent near Middle East (Colors of pins indicate number of species of Aegilops found in that area). Data taken from Kew (RBG Grassbase) database (Clayton et al., 2006).

There have been many reports of species of Aegilops being utilized for the improvement of agronomic traits such as rust resistance, powdery mildew resistance and tolerance against other abiotic stresses. More than 41 resistance genes for various biotic and abiotic stresses have been transferred from Aegilops to wheat via chromosome translocations or homoeologous recombination (Zhang et al., 2015) and many of these genes have been fairly successful in many breeding programs (Jahier et al., 1989; Ambrozkova et al., 2002; Zhang et al., 2015). This review summarizes the potential of Aegilops species for utilization in improvement of end product and nutritional quality of wheat.

Utilization of Aegilops for Improvement of End Product Quality of Wheat

The end product quality of wheat is affected by a number of factors such as: total protein content, grain texture and seed storage proteins composition. Seed storage proteins are the major determinants of end product quality and mainly consist of glutenins and gliadins. A large number of alleles of glutenins and gliadins have been explored in Aegilops species with their implications on end product quality. Grain texture related puroindolins, grain softness protein (GSP) and many other grain quality related genes have also been reported from Aegilops.

High Molecular Weight Glutenins (HMW GS)

High molecular weight glutenins are the major determinants of bread making quality of wheat. Their importance can be attributed to the fact that though they constitute only about 12% of total seed storage proteins, up to 60% of alterations in baking parameters are affected by them (Payne et al., 1987). HMW GS are coded by Glu1 loci present on the long arms of homoeologous group 1 chromosomes (1A, 1B and 1D) named as Glu A1, Glu B1 and Glu D1, respectively. Each locus produces two subunits of different size; called x-type (larger) and y-type (smaller) subunits i.e., 1Ax, 1Ay; 1Bx, 1By and 1Dx, 1Dy. Subunits 1Bx, 1Dx and 1Dy are expressed in most of the bread wheat cultivars while 1By and 1Ax are expressed in some wheat cultivars. The gene coding 1Ay generally remains silent in most of bread wheat cultivars (Halford et al., 1989). Only 21 alleles have been reported for Glu A1 locus, while for Glu B1 more than 69 alleles and for Glu D1 only 29 alleles have been documented in bread wheat germplasm (McIntosh et al., 2013).

Due to this limited genetic diversity, high levels of allelic variations at Glu 1 loci are required in the quality wheat breeding practice. These are easiest to study as they can be conveniently resolved and identified by electrophoresis. Among the traits explored here, more than 600 lines and accessions of Aegilops have been studied across the world for their rich genetic diversity for HMW GS (Figure 3). Fairly large numbers of countries are involved in the exploration of HMW GS and their distribution across countries is also uniform (Figure 4). Primary structures of most of the Aegilops specific HMW GS are similar to wheat subunits. They contain conserved N-, C-terminals and a central variable repetitive region (Mackie et al., 1996; Wan et al., 2000; Xie et al., 2001). More than 30 subunits of HMW GS from Ae. bicornis, Ae. longissima, Ae. sharonensis, Ae. searsii, Ae. cylindrica, Ae. umbellulata, Ae. caudata, Ae. juvenalis, Ae. kotschyi, Ae. comosa, Ae. uniaristata, Ae. crassa, Ae. ventricosa and Ae. speltoides have been reported and studied (Table 1) (Wan et al., 2000, 2002; Xie et al., 2001; Liu et al., 2003; Sun et al., 2006; Farkhari et al., 2007; Jiang et al., 2012; Ma et al., 2013). Many of these HMW GS have been cloned and their sequence information is available.

Figure 3

Number of accessions/lines of Aegilops explored along with number of countries involved in their exploration for improvement of quality and nutritional traits in wheat. HMW GS are most explored, while phytochemicals are least explored among different groups across the world. Gliadin exploration is being carried out by highest number of countries with LMW and phytochemicals being in the lowest category.

Figure 4

Work done across the world on Aegilops for improvement of quality and nutrition. Colors of pins indicate different traits. Numbers along pins indicate total number of accessions/lines explored.

Table 1

Aegilops species explored for high molecular weight glutenins.

S.No.	Species	Lines/accessions	Subunits	Reference
1.	Ae. caudata (CC)	Y588	1Cx, 1Cy	Liu et al., 2003
2.	Ae. caudata (CC)	Y46	1.1C, 9.1C Increased gluten strength	Du and Zhang, 2017
3.	Ae. tauschii (DD)	TD12, TD26, and TD190	DT1, DT2 Low gluten index, gluten resistance	Hsam et al., 2001
4.	Ae. tauschii (DD)	SHW line	2.1∗D, 2.1D, 1.5D, 2D, 3D, 4D, 5D, 10D, 10.5D, 12D, 12∗D, DT2	Pflüger et al., 2001
5.	Ae. tauschii (DD)	As2396	13D	Yan et al., 2002
6.	Ae. tauschii (DD)	TD159	12.1D	Yan et al., 2004
7.	Ae. tauschii (DD)	Multiple accessions	2.1D, 1.5D, 1.5∗D, 2D, 3D, 4D, 5.1D, 5D, 5∗D 10D, 10.1D, 10.2D, 10.3∗D, 10.4D, 11D, 12D, 12.1∗D, 12.2∗D, DT2, 12.3D, 12.4∗D, 12.5D	Yan et al., 2003
8.	Ae. tauschii (DD)	RM0198, AS2388	2D, 2.1D, 12D	Wan et al., 2005
9.	Ae. tauschii (DD)	TD81, TD130	5.1∗D, 5∗D, 12.1∗D, 10.1D	Zhang et al., 2008
10.	Ae. tauschii (DD)	TD16	1.6D	An et al., 2009
11.	Ae. tauschii (DD)	TD87, TD130, TD151	12.1∗D, 12.2D	Zhang et al., 2009
12.	Ae. tauschii (DD)	SHW line	2-1D, 2-2D, 2-3D, 1.5-1D,2.1-1D, 10-1D, 12-1D	Xu et al., 2010
13	Ae. tauschii (DD)	T67 and T132	3D, 4D	Wang K. et al., 2012
14.	Ae. bicornis (SbSb)	CIae 70	2.9Sb, 2.3Sb	Jiang et al., 2012
15.	Ae. longissima (SlSl)	PI 604122	2.9Sl, 2.3Sl	Jiang et al., 2012
16.	Ae. longissima (SlSl)	DSL -1Sl(1B)	2.3∗Sl, 16∗Sl Improved dough strength and baking quality	Wang S. et al., 2013
17.	Ae. longissima (SlSl)	DSL -1Sl(1A)	1Slx, 1Sly Higher dough strength, farinograph development time, stability time, gluten index, bread loaf volume, and bread quality score	Garg et al., 2014
18.	Ae. searsii (SsSs)	Multiple accessions	48586Ss, 48586Ss, 49077Ss, 49077Ss	Sun et al., 2006
19.	Ae. searsii (SsSs)	Multiple DALs	1Ssx, 2Ssx, 1Ssy, 2Ssy Improved specific sedimentation, mixing properties and polymeric protein content	Garg et al., 2009
20.	Ae. searsii (SsSs)	DSL- GL1402 1B(1Ss)	2114Ss, 2114Ss Better dough strength and mixing properties	Du et al., 2018
21.	Ae. sharonensis (SshSsh)	PI 584388	2.9Ssh, 2.3Ssh	Jiang et al., 2012
22.	Ae. speltoides (SS)	Multiple accessions	15∗Sx, 15∗Sy	Ma et al., 2013
23.	Ae. umbellulata (UU)	IG46953, Y39, Y137, and Y139	1Ux, 1Uy	Liu et al., 2003
24.	Ae. cylindrica (CCDD)	Multiple accessions	1Cx, 1Cy	Wan et al., 2000
25.	Ae. biuncialis (UbUbMbMb)	DAL1Ub	1Ux, 1Uy Increased protein content, Zeleny sedimentation value, wet gluten content, and grain hardness	Zhou et al., 2014
26.	Ae. geniculata (MMUU)	Multiple DALs DSLs- 1Mg(1A), 1Mg(1B), 1Mg(1D)	1Ugx, 1Ugy 1Mgx, 1Mgy	Garg et al., 2016
27.	Ae. kotschyi (UUSS)	Multiple accessions	2.3U/Sx, 1∗U/Sx, 3∗U/Sx, 20∗U/Sy, 8∗U/Sy	Ma et al., 2013
28.	Ae. kotschyi (UUSS)	Wheat- Ae. kotschyi acc. 396 derivative 49-1-73-10	1Ux, 1Uy	Singh et al., 2016
29.	Ae. juvenalis (DDMMUU)	Not mentioned	1Jx,2Jx,1Jy,2Jy	Xie et al., 2001

Aegilops tauschii is regarded as D genome donor of wheat and its many accessions for HMW GS have been explored. For HMW GS, extensive studies have been done on the Glu D1 loci from Ae. tauschii as variation in this locus is very important in determining dough strength and other end product qualities. More than 40 HMW GS allelic variants have been reported from multiple accessions of Ae. tauschii (Yan et al., 2002, 2003, 2004; Wan et al., 2005; Zhang et al., 2008; An et al., 2009; Wang K. et al., 2012). Many D genome synthetic hexaploids have been generated by crossing tetraploid durum wheat with Ae. tauschii and thus HMW GS alleles 2.1∗D, 2.1D, 1.5D, 2D, 3D, 4D, 5D, 10D, 10.5D, 12D, 12∗D, T2 (Pflüger et al., 2001), 2-1D, 2-2D, 2-3D, 1.5-1D, 2.1-1D, 10-1D, and 12-1D (Xu et al., 2010) have been transferred to wheat. D genome specific subunits of 5Dx+10Dy have been reported to be most important for bread making quality of wheat (Branlard and Dardevet, 1985b). Attempts have been made to replace null Glu A1 allele of wheat with Glu D1 allele carrying 5Dx+10Dy subunits (Ceoloni et al., 1996; Ammar et al., 1997). Substitution of chromosome 1A with 1D has shown improvement in dough strength (Liu and Shepherd, 1995; Garg et al., 2007). A chromosomal translocation line 1AS.1AL-1DL carrying Glu D1d alleles (5Dx+10Dy) was generated in durum wheat background and was reported to possess improved mixing properties (Klindworth et al., 2005). Transfer of Glu D1 locus to chromosome 1R and 1A of Triticale has also been shown to improve bread making properties (Lukaszewski, 2006).

Implications of many HMW GS from Aegilops species on product quality have been studied. Subunits 1.1C and 9C from Ae. caudata led to increased gluten strength (Du and Zhang, 2017) while 2D+T1+T2 subunits from Ae. tauschii are associated with low gluten index and gluten resistance (Hsam et al., 2001). Disomic addition lines (DALs) from Ae. searsii have been used to transfer HMW GS subunits 1Ssx1, 1Ssx2, 1Ssy1and 1Ssy2 into wheat (Garg et al., 2009). These addition lines showed improved specific sedimentation, mixing properties and polymeric protein content. Similarly, DAL-1Ub of Ae. biuncialis (Zhou et al., 2014) were generated to transfer 1Ubx and 1Uby subunits to wheat and these lines showed increased protein content, Zeleny sedimentation value, wet gluten content, and grain hardness. Addition lines of Ae. umbellulata showed negative impact of its HMW GS on dough strength (Garg et al., 2009). Addition of 1Ug chromosome to transfer 1Ugx and 1Ugy subunits from Ae. geniculata led to reduced dough strength (Garg et al., 2016). Addition of 1Mg chromosome from Ae. geniculata to Chinese Spring background of wheat improved dough strength significantly (Garg et al., 2016). Many disomic substitution lines (DSLs) have also been generated from DALs. Addition line of 1Mg chromosome from Ae. geniculata was used to generate chromosome specific DSLs- 1Mg(1A), 1Mg(1B) and 1Mg(1D). DSLs- 1Mg(1A) and 1Mg(1B) showed improved dough strength and mixing properties but 1Mg(1D) showed reduced dough strength (Garg et al., 2016). Substitution of chromosome 1Sl from Ae. longissima with chromosomes 1A (Garg et al., 2014) and 1B (Wang S. et al., 2013) significantly improved bread making qualities of wheat. Similarly substituting chromosome 1Ss from Ae. searsii with 1B led to better dough strength and mixing properties (Du et al., 2018). All these addition and substitution lines that improved dough strength can be utilized to transfer HMW GS alleles into wheat in form of fine translocations with least linkage drag.

Low Molecular Weight Glutenins (LMW GS)

Low molecular weight glutenins account for 60% of total glutenins and one third of seed storage proteins. Genes that code for LMW GS (Glu A3, Glu B3 and Glu D3) are present on the short arms of group 1 homoeologous chromosomes (Singh and Shepherd, 1988; Sreeramulu and Singh, 1997). Only six alleles at Glu A3, nine at Glu B3 and five at Glu D3 have been reported in wheat germplasm (McIntosh et al., 2013). There are additional three loci (Glu 2, Glu 4 and Glu 5) present on chromosomes 1B, 1D and 7D (Jackson et al., 1985; Liu and Shepherd, 1995; Sreeramulu and Singh, 1997). On the basis of SDS PAGE mobility LMW GS can be classified into B, C and D types (Jackson et al., 1983). B type LMW GS are further classified into m, s and i type on the basis of first amino acid methionine, serine and isoleucine, respectively (Muccilli et al., 2010). Besides these three types, a novel LMW GS, l type was identified specifically in Aegilops with first amino acid being leucine (Wang K. et al., 2011).

Low molecular weight glutenins provide viscoelastic properties to the dough and some of their alleles have been reported to be associated with good bread making quality. Aegilops species serve as rich source of genetic diversity of LMW GS. More than 13 alleles of LMW GS from Ae. tauschii (Pei et al., 2007; Zhao et al., 2008; Cao et al., 2018), 12 alleles from Ae. longissima (Jiang et al., 2008; Huang et al., 2010a), 11 alleles from Ae. comosa (Wang K. et al., 2011), 4 alleles from Ae. neglecta (Li X. et al., 2008), 3 alleles from Ae. umbellulata and one from Ae. kotschyi (Li X. et al., 2008), Ae. uniaristata, Ae. caudata and Ae. speltoides each (Table 2) (Li et al., 2010) have been identified and characterized (Table 2). Most of these LMW GS genes have been cloned and their sequence information is available in NCBI. There is large amount of variability present in Aegilops specific LMW GS. Ae. tauschii exhibits even greater variation in LMW GS sequences than wheat (Rehman et al., 2008). There have been reports of novel LMW GS genes Glu U3a and Glu U3b from wheat-Ae. umbellulata 1U(1B) substitution line showing improved bread making and mixing properties. This substitution line was used to transfer the LMW GS genes to wheat. The line thus developed showed improvement in dough development time, stability time, farinograph quality number, gluten index, loaf size and inner structure (Wang et al., 2017). The variability in LMW GS genes found in Aegilops species indicates a large potential for their utilization in improvement of end product qualities of wheat. In comparison to HMW GS, works on transfer of LMW GS alleles from Aegilops species to wheat cultivars have been limited. As per literature only 147 accessions/lines have been explored for LMW GS, which too mainly in China (Figure 3, 4) and further exploration is needed.

Table 2

Aegilops species explored for low molecular weight glutenins.

S.No.	Species	Lines/accessions	Characteristics	Reference
1	Ae. caudata (CC)	PI254863	AmLMW-m1	Li et al., 2010
2	Ae. tauschii (DD)	T121, T128, T132	LMW-T121, LMW-T128, LMW-T132	Pei et al., 2007
3	Ae. tauschii (DD)	Multiple accessions	GluDt3-3, GluDt3-6	Zhao et al., 2008
4	Ae. tauschii (DD)	Multiple accessions	TaALPb7D-(A–M)	Cao et al., 2018
5	Ae. comosa (MM)	PI551017	AcLMW-m1	Li et al., 2010
6	Ae. comosa (MM)	PI 551017, PI 551019	AcLMW-L1, AcLMW-L2, AcLMW-L3, AcLMW-L4, AcLMW-I1, AcLMW-I2, AcLMW-I3, AcLMW-M1, AcLMW-M2, AcLMW-M3	Wang K. et al., 2011
7	Ae. uniaristata (NN)	PI554419	AuLMW-m1	Li et al., 2010
8	Ae. speltoides (SS)	PI170204	AsLMW-m1	Li et al., 2010
	Ae. longissima (SlSl)	PI604108, PI604110	TzLMW-m1, TzLMW-m2, TdLMW-m1 AlLMW-m2	Jiang et al., 2008
9	Ae. longissima (SlSl)	PI604103, PI604124, PI604126, PI604129	SL124-1, SL126-1, SL129-1, SL129-2, SL129-3, SL129-4, SL103-1, SL103-2	Huang et al., 2010a
11	Ae. umbellulata (UU)	PI222762	AumLMW-m1	Li et al., 2010
12	Ae. umbellulata (UU)	DSL -1U(1B)	Glu-U3a, Glu-U3b Improved dough development time, stability time, farinograph quality number, gluten index, loaf size and inner structure	Wang et al., 2017
13	Ae. umbellulata (UU)	CNU609 [CS- DSL 1U(1B) derivative]	Glu-U3a, Glu-U3b Improved dough development time, stability time, farinograph quality number, gluten index, loaf size and inner structure	Wang et al., 2017
14	Ae. neglecta (UUMM)	PI298897	AnLMW-m1, AnLMW-m2, AnLMW-m3, AnLMW-m4	Li X. et al., 2008
15	Ae.kotschyi (UUSS) Ae. juvenalis (DDMMUU)	PI226615, PI330485	AjkLMW-I	Li X. et al., 2008

Gliadins

Gliadins account for 40–50% of total seed storage proteins. They have impacts on both processing and nutritional quality. Gliadins can be separated into α-/β-, γ-, and ω-gliadins based on differences in their mobility on SDS PAGE gel. Gli 1 loci present on short arms of homoeologous group 1 chromosomes code for all ω- and most of γ-gliadins, while, Gli 2 loci on the short arms of homoeologous group 6 chromosomes code for all α-, most of the β-, and some of the γ-gliadins (Payne, 1987; Metakovsky et al., 1990; Metakovsky, 1991). The effect of gliadins on rheological properties of dough has been studied (Branlard and Dardevet, 1985a). Due to lack of free cysteine residues in most of the gliadins, they are unable to form intermolecular S-S linkages. Hence, their overall impact on processing quality is small as compared to glutenins (Qi et al., 2009). Gliadins may act as chain terminators for gluten polymer. They therefore might limit the size of gluten complex and hence affect end product quality (Muccilli et al., 2005). However, many gliadins with odd number of cysteins also exist (Anderson et al., 2001; Goryunova et al., 2012). So some gliadins might also participate in gluten polymerization. It has been hypothesized that gliadins proteins contribute mostly toward dough cohesiveness (Uthayakumaran et al., 2000) and viscosity (Pistón et al., 2011) rather than resistance and extension. Studies on effect of Aegilops specific gliadins on product quality are limited. Multiple accessions of Ae. biuncialis and Ae. umbellulata have been reported to possess high gluten quality indices due to gliadins (Ahmadpoor et al., 2014) (Table 3). Gliadins from Ae. cylindrica (Khabiri et al., 2013), Ae. biuncialis (Kozub et al., 2012) and Ae. geniculata (Medouri et al., 2015) have been characterized on the basis of mobility on SDS PAGE (Table 3). Many ω-gliadins have been sequenced and characterized from Ae. tauschii (Yan et al., 2003; Hassani et al., 2009). γ-gliadins have been characterized from Ae. caudata, Ae. uniaristata, Ae. mutica, Ae. umbellulata (Goryunova et al., 2012), Ae. bicornis, Ae. searsii, Ae. sharonensis (Qi et al., 2009; Huang et al., 2010b), Ae. longissima (Qi et al., 2009), Ae. tauschii (Qi et al., 2009; Goryunova et al., 2012; Wang S. et al., 2012), Ae. speltoides (Huang et al., 2010b; Goryunova et al., 2012), Ae. markgrafii (Li M. et al., 2017) and Ae. cylindrica (Wang S. et al., 2012) (Table 3).

Table 3

Aegilops species explored for gliadins.

S. No.	Species	Lines/accessions	Characteristics	Reference
1	Ae. caudata (CC)	κ-2255	γ-gliadins	Goryunova et al., 2012
2	Ae. caudata (CC)	PI573416, PI551119, PI298889, PI564196	α-gliadins	Li et al., 2012
3	Ae. caudata (CC)	Y46	γ-gliadins	Li M. et al., 2017
4	Ae. tauschii (DD)	Multiple accessions	ω-Gliadins	Yan et al., 2003
5	Ae. tauschii (DD)	AUS18913, CPI110856	ω-gliadin γ-gliadin	Hassani et al., 2009
6	Ae. tauschii (DD)	AS60	γ-gliadins	Qi et al., 2009
7	Ae. tauschii (DD)	AUS18913, CPI110856	ω-gliadin	Hassani et al., 2009
8	Ae. tauschii (DD)	T15, T43, T26	α-gliadins	Xie et al., 2010
9	Ae. tauschii (DD)	κ-1368	γ-gliadins	Goryunova et al., 2012
10	Ae. tauschii (DD)	AT9, AT9.1, AT25, AT48, AT176	γ-gliadins	Wang S. et al., 2012
11	Ae. tauschii (DD)	T006	α-gliadins	Li Y.G. et al., 2017
12	Ae. comosa (MM)	PI551020	α-gliadins	Li et al., 2012
13	Ae. uniaristata (NN)	κ-650	γ-gliadins	Goryunova et al., 2012
14	Ae. uniaristata (NN)	PI276996, PI276996, PI554420, PI554418	α-gliadins	Li et al., 2012
15	Ae. bicornis (SbSb)	CIae 47	γ-gliadins	Qi et al., 2009
16	Ae. bicornis (SbSb)	CIae 47, CIae 70	γ-gliadins	Huang et al., 2010c
17	Ae. bicornis (SbSb)	CIae 47	α-gliadins	Huang et al., 2016
18	Ae. longissima (SlSl)	PI 604104	γ-gliadins	Qi et al., 2009
19	Ae. longissima (SlSl)	PI 604104, PI604129, PI604130, PI604131, PI604133	γ-gliadins	Huang et al., 2010c
20	Ae. searsii (SsSs)	PI 599123	γ-gliadins	Qi et al., 2009
21	Ae. searsii (SsSs)	PI 599122, PI599124, PI599138, PI599139, PI599150	γ-gliadins	Huang et al., 2010c
22	Ae. searsii (SsSs)	Multiple accessions	α-gliadins	Huang et al., 2016
23	Ae. sharonesis (SshSsh)	CIae 32	γ-gliadins	Qi et al., 2009
24	Ae. sharonensis (SshSsh)	PI584350	α-gliadins	Huang et al., 2010b
25	Ae. sharonensis (SshSsh)	CIae 32, PI 584345, PI 584349, PI584350, PI584357, PI584391	γ-gliadins	Huang et al., 2010c
26	Ae. sharonensis (SshSsh)	Multiple accessions	α-gliadins	Huang et al., 2016
27	Ae. speltoides (SS)	PI 584391, PI554305, PI560527	γ-gliadins	Huang et al., 2010c
28	Ae. speltoides (SS)	CGN10682, CGN10684	γ-gliadins	Goryunova et al., 2012
29	Ae. umbellulata (UU)	κ-1588	γ-gliadins	Goryunova et al., 2012
30	Ae. umbellulata (UU)	PI298906, PI542364, PI573516	α-gliadins	Li et al., 2012
31	Ae. mutica (TT)	κ-1581	γ-gliadins	Goryunova et al., 2012
32	Ae. cylindrica (CCDD)	PI256029	γ-gliadins	Wang S. et al., 2012
32	Ae. cylindrica (CCDD)	Multiple accessions	Gliadins	Khabiri et al., 2013
34	Ae. geniculata (MMUU)	Multiple accessions	Gliadins	Medouri et al., 2015
35	Ae. biuncialis (UbUbMbMb)	Multiple accessions	Gliadins	Kozub et al., 2012

Although fairly large number of lines and accessions (more than 400) of Aegilops have been explored for gliadins (Figure 3) and their exploration is quite distributed across several countries of the world (Figure 4), most of the research conducted on gliadins of Aegilops is related to identification and characterization of allergic epitopes of celiac disease (Juhász et al., 2018). α-Gliadins are considered to be most allergic and are mostly responsible for inflammatory responses to celiac disease. α-Gliadins from Ae. speltoides (Spaenij-Dekking et al., 2004) and Ae. tauschii (Xie et al., 2010; Li et al., 2012, 2013) have been reported to be less allergic than corresponding wheat alleles. Novel α-gliadins have been reported from Ae. bicornis, Ae. searsii, Ae. sharonensis (Huang et al., 2010c, 2016), Ae tauschii (Xie et al., 2010; Li Y.G. et al., 2017), Ae. comosa, Ae. umbellulata, Ae. markgrafii and Ae. uniaristata (Li et al., 2012) (Table 3). These gliadins could contain useful variation and can be replaced from more allergic gliadins in wheat.

Puroindolins and Grain Softness Protein

Grain texture plays important role in determining end product quality of wheat. Soft textured wheat is mostly used for pastries and biscuits, while hard textured wheat is used in making bread, pasta and noodles (Morris and Rose, 1996). Grain texture is determined by the hardness (Ha) locus present on the telomeric region of short arm of chromosome 5D of wheat which contains ten tightly linked genes (Chantret et al., 2005). Among them, three genes- puroindolin a (Pin a), puroindolin b (Pin b) and grain softness protein-1 (GSP) play major role in determining seed texture. These three genes code for the proteins which constitute a 15 kDa complex- friabilin, with Pin a, Pin b as major components and GSP-1 as minor component (Cuesta et al., 2015). This protein complex is found abundantly on the surface of starch granules of soft textured wheat and in very small amounts in hard textured wheat (Chen et al., 2005). Presence of this complex results in prevention of adhesion between starch granules and gluten matrix and hence soft texture (Greenwell and Schofield, 1986). Pin a and Pin b genes have also been associated with antimicrobial properties conferring protection to seed (Dubreil et al., 1998; Miao et al., 2012). Pin a especially has been hypothesized to have evolved in response to plant pathogens to enhance plant fitness (Massa and Morris, 2006). Soft seed texture is associated with wild type alleles of Pin a and Pin b (Pina-D1a and Pinb-D1a) and many mutations in those alleles have been linked with hard texture (Giroux and Morris, 1998). Pin a and Pin b genes are not present on A and B genome specific chromosomes (Li W. et al., 2008) and diploid species with A and B genomes as well as tetraploid durum wheat lack them, as a result of which durum has a very hard kernel texture (Chen et al., 2005). This also indicates Ae. tauschii as the donor of Pin genes in hexaploid wheat. Species of Aegilops have been explored for presence of different Pin alleles. Many novel Pin alleles have been reported from multiple accessions of Ae. tauschii (Table 4) (Massa et al., 2004; Gazza et al., 2006; Simeone et al., 2006; Liu et al., 2016). Many accessions of Ae. tauschii have been crossed with tetraploid durum wheat to produce synthetic wheat lines with different textures (Reynolds et al., 2010; Li et al., 2007). Many other Aegilops species have also been explored for variability in Pin a and Pin b gene alleles.19 alleles of puroindolins from Ae. speltoides, 9 alleles from Ae. searsii, 8 alleles from Ae. comosa, 7 from Ae. caudata and Ae. umbellulata each, 4 from Ae. longissima, Ae. ventricosa and Ae. bicornis each and 2 from Ae. sharonensis have been reported (Table 4) (Gazza et al., 2006; Simeone et al., 2006; Cuesta et al., 2013, 2015).

Table 4

Aegilops species explored for puroindolins and grain softness proteins.

S.No.	Species	Source	Pin a Alleles	Pinb Alleles	GSP Alleles	Reference
1	Ae. caudata (CC)	Multiple accessions	Pina-C1-I,	Pinb-C1-I,		Cuesta et al., 2013
			Pina-C1-II,	Pinb-C1-II,
			Pina-C1-III,	Pinb-C1-III
				Pinb-C1-IV
2	Ae. caudata (CC)	Multiple accessions			GSP-C1-I,	Cuesta et al., 2015
					GSP-C1-II,
					GSP-C1-III,
					GSP-C1-IV
3	Ae. tauschii (DD)	CPI110799	Pina	Pinb	GSP	Turnbull et al., 2003
4	Ae. tauschii (DD)	Multiple accessions	Pina-D1g,	Pinb-D1i,	GSP-D1g,	Massa et al., 2004
			Pina-D1a,	Pinb-D1j,	GSP-D1h,
			Pina-D1c,	Pinb-D1h,	GSP-D1c,
			Pina-D1d,	Pinb-D1a	GSP-D1e
			Pina-D1e,		GSP-D1d
			Pina-D1f,		GSP-D1f,
					GSP-D1b
5	Ae. tauschii (DD)	TA1704, TA1691, TA2381, TA10	Pina-D1d,	Pinb-D1i,		Simeone et al., 2006
			Pina-D1a,	Pinb-D1j,
			Pina-D1c	Pinb-D1h
6	Ae. tauschii (DD)	L35	Pina-D1d	Pinb-D1i		Gazza et al., 2006
7	Ae. tauschii (DD)	SHW	Pina-D1a,	Pinb-D1h,		Li et al., 2007
			Pina-D1c	Pinb-D1j
8	Ae. tauschii (DD)	SHW	Pina-D1c	Pinb-D1h		Reynolds et al., 2010
9	Ae. tauschii (DD)	Multiple accessions	Pina-D1o	Pinb-D1dt,		Liu et al., 2016
				Pinb-D1it
10	Ae. comosa (MM)	Multiple accessions	Pina-M1-I,	Pinb-M1-I,		Cuesta et al., 2013
			Pina-M1-II,	Pinb-M1-II
			Pina-M1-III	Pinb-M1-III,
				Pinb-M1-IV,
				Pinb-M1-V
11	Ae. comosa (MM)	Multiple accessions			GSP-M1-I,	Cuesta et al., 2015
				GSP-M1-II
12	Ae. speltoides (SS)	TA2368, TA1789, TA1777	Pina-S1c,	Pinb-S1c,		Simeone et al., 2006
			Pina-S1d,	Pinb-S1d,
			Pina-S1e	Pinb-S1e
13	Ae. speltoides (SS)	Multiple accessions	Pina-S1-I,	Pinb-S1-I,		Cuesta et al., 2013
			Pina-S1-II,	Pinb-S1-II,
			Pina-S1-III,	Pinb-S1-III,
			Pina-S1-IV	Pinb-S1-IV,
				Pinb-S1-V,
				Pinb-S1-VI,
				Pinb-S1-VII,
				Pinb-S1-VIII,
				Pinb-S1-IX
14	Ae. speltoides (SS)	Multiple accessions			GSP-S1-I,	Cuesta et al., 2015
					GSP-S1-II,
					GSP-S1-III,
					GSP-S1-IV,
					GSP-S1-V,
					GSP-S1-VI
					GSP-S1-VII
15	Ae. searsii (SsSs)	TA1837, TA2355	Pina-Ss1a,	Pinb-Ss1b,		Simeone et al., 2006
			Pina-Ss1b	Pinb-Ss1a
16	Ae. searsii (SsSs)	Multiple accessions	Pina-Ss1-I,	Pinb-Ss1-I,		Cuesta et al., 2013
			Pina-Ss1-II	Pinb-Ss1-II,
				Pinb-Ss1-III
17	Ae. searsii (SsSs)	Multiple accessions			GSP-Ss1-I,	Cuesta et al., 2015
				GSP-Ss1-II
18	Ae. longissima (SlSl)	TA1912, TA1921,	Pina-Sl1a,	Pinb-Sl1a,		Simeone et al., 2006
			Pina-Sl1b	Pinb-Sl1b
19	Ae. bicornis (SbSb)	TA1954, TA1942	Pina-Sb1a,	Pinb-Sb1a,		Simeone et al., 2006
			Pina-Sb1b	Pinb-Sb1b
20	Ae. sharonensis (ShSh)	TA1999	Pina-Ssh1a	Pinb-Ssh1a		Simeone et al., 2006
21	Ae. umbellulata (UU)	Multiple accessions	Pina-U1-I,	Pinb-U1-I,		Cuesta et al., 2013
			Pina-U1-II,	Pinb-U1-II,
			Pina-U1-III,	Pinb-U1-III
				Pina-U1-IV
22	Ae. umbellulata (UU)	Multiple accessions			GSP-U1-I,	Cuesta et al., 2015
				GSP-U1-II,
				GSP-U1-III,
				GSP-U1-IV
23	Ae. ventricosa (DDNN)	L36	Pina-D1a,	Pinb-D1h, and		Gazza et al., 2006
			Pina-N1a	Pinb-N1a.

Unlike Pin a and Pin b, GSP genes are present on A and B genome specific chromosomes (5A, 5B). However, their deletion does not impact the grain texture (Chen et al., 2005). GSP genes have been characterized in many species of Aegilops. Many novel GSP alleles in Ae. tauschii, Ae. comosa, Ae. caudata, Ae. searsii, Ae. speltoides and Ae. umbellulata have been reported and characterized (Massa et al., 2004; Cuesta et al., 2015). Almost 100 alleles of Pin a, Pin b and GSP have been identified across 200 lines/accessions of Aegilops (Figure 3). Their exploration is quite uniform across different countries in the world (Figure 4). All these alleles can serve as useful source of variation and need to be evaluated and utilized in breeding programs for extending the textural characteristics of wheat.

Utilization of Aegilops for Improvement of Nutritional Quality of Wheat

Improvement of nutrition is a very important aspect of wheat research as there are over two billion people worldwide, suffering from deficiencies in proteins and micronutrients (World Health Organization, 2006). Nutritive value of wheat can be enhanced by increasing micronutrients like Fe and Zn, protein content, dietary fibers and many other phytochemicals such as carotenoids, vitamins etc. Aegilops genus can serve as important source for enhancing nutrition in wheat due to its high genetic variability.

Improvement of Grain Micronutrients Concentration

Micronutrients play very important role as health promoting factors. Since most of the world’s population especially developing nations depend on cereal based diet to fulfill their micronutrients requirements, it becomes very important to develop the varieties with improved micronutrients content. Iron and zinc are the most important components among micronutrients. Most varieties of wheat lack sufficient levels of iron and zinc due to low genetic variability. To overcome this limited genetic variability more than 180 lines/accessions of Aegilops have been explored (Figure 2, 3). Many accessions of Ae. kotschyi (Chhuneja et al., 2006; Rawat et al., 2009a,b, 2011), Ae. longissima (Kumari et al., 2013), Ae. tauschii, Ae. peregrina, Ae. cylindrica, Ae. ventricosa and Ae. geniculata (Rawat et al., 2009b) have been reported to have higher contents of iron and zinc in seeds (Table 5). These accessions can be exploited for increasing grain iron and zinc content. Amphiploids (Tiwari et al., 2010) and partial amphiploids (Rawat et al., 2009b) generated by crossing Ae. kotschyi accessions with wheat have been reported to have higher grain iron and zinc content. Many disomic and monosomic addition lines specific to various Aegilops species have been explored for higher micronutrient content. Fair exploration of grain micronutrient content has been carried out in many countries (Figure 3). Major exploration of Aegilops for Fe/Zn is from India (158 lines and accessions) as compared to other countries (Figure 4). Many disomic and monosomic addition lines of Ae. peregrina, Ae. longissima and Ae. umbellulata, in wheat have been explored for grain iron and zinc concentrations (Kumari et al., 2012). Addition of chromosome pairs 1Sl (Wang S. et al., 2011), 2Sl (Wang S. et al., 2011; Kumari et al., 2012) and 7Sl (Wang S. et al., 2011) of Ae. longissima into wheat showed increase in grain iron and zinc content. Similarly, DALs of chromosomes 2Sv, 2Uv, 7Uv (Kumari et al., 2012) and 4Sv (Wang S. et al., 2011) of Ae. peregrina, 2U (Kumari et al., 2012) and 6U (Wang S. et al., 2011; Kumari et al., 2012) of Ae. umbellulata, 1Ss and 2Ss of Ae. searsii (Wang S. et al., 2011), 5Mg of Ae. geniculata (Wang S. et al., 2011) and B chromosome additions from Ae. caudata (Wang S. et al., 2011) have been reported to increase the iron and zinc content in grains (Table 5). The addition lines can be used to produce DSLs which are better materials to study the compensation effect of alien chromosomes into wheat. Substitution of 4B chromosome of wheat with 3Mb chromosome of Ae. biuncialis (Farkas et al., 2014) also lead to increased iron and zinc content. Similarly, 2S(2A), 7U(7A) substitutions specific to Ae. kotschyi (Tiwari et al., 2010) have been reported with increased grain iron and zinc content.

Table 5

Aegilops species explored for grain micronutrient content.

S.No.	Aegilops sp.	Lines/Accessions	Trait	Reference
1.	Ae. caudata (CC)	DALs	Iron, Zinc	Wang S. et al., 2011
2.	Ae. tauschii (DD)	SHW	Zn uptake	Cakmak et al., 1999
3.	Ae. tauschii (DD)	SHW	Iron, Manganese, Zinc, Calcium, Uptake of Iron, Manganese, Potassium, Phosphorus	Calderini and Ortiz-Monasterio, 2003
4.	Ae. tauschii (DD)	SHW	Iron, Zinc	Chhuneja et al., 2006
5.	Ae. longissima (SlSl)	DALs 1Sl, 2Sl	Iron, Zinc	Wang S. et al., 2011
6.	Ae. longissima (SlSl)	2Sl, 7Sl	Iron, Zinc	Kumari et al., 2012
7.	Ae. longissima (SlSl)	DALs	Iron, Zinc, Copper, Manganese, Calcium, Magnesium, Potassium	Kumari et al., 2012
8.	Ae. longissima (SlSl)	Wheat – Ae. longissima derivatives	Iron, Zinc	Sharma et al., 2014
9.	Ae. longissima (SlSl)	Hybrids	Iron, Zinc	Tiwari et al., 2008
10.	Ae. searsii (SsSs)	DALs 1Ss, 2Ss	Iron, Zinc	Wang S. et al., 2011
11.	Ae. umbellulata (UU)	DALs 2U, 6U	Iron, Zinc	Wang S. et al., 2011
12.	Ae. umbellulata (UU)	DAL 2U	Iron, Zinc	Kumari et al., 2012
13.	Ae. cylindrica (CCDD)	DALs	Iron, Zinc	Rawat et al., 2009a
14.	Ae. cylindrica (CCDD)	Accessions and interspecific hybrids with Triticum aestivum	Iron, Zinc	Rawat et al., 2009a
15.	Ae. ventricosa (DDNN)	DALs	Iron, Zinc	Rawat et al., 2009b
16.	Ae. ventricosa (DDNN)	Accessions and interspecific hybrids with Triticum aestivum	Iron, Zinc	Rawat et al., 2009a
17.	Ae. geniculata (MMUU)	Accessions and interspecific hybrids with Triticum aestivum	Iron, Zinc	Rawat et al., 2009a
18.	Ae. geniculata (MMUU)	DAL 5 Mg	Iron, Zinc	Wang S. et al., 2011
19.	Ae. biuncialis (UbUbMbMb)	DSLs 3Mb(4B), Translocation line 3Mb.4BS	Potassium, Zinc, Iron, Manganese	Farkas et al., 2014
20.	Ae. kotschyi (UUSS)	Not mentioned	Iron, Zinc	Chhuneja et al., 2006
21.	Ae. kotschyi (UUSS)	DALs	Iron, Zinc	Rawat et al., 2009a
22.	Ae. kotschyi (UUSS)	Accessions and interspecific hybrids with Triticum aestivum	Iron, Zinc	Rawat et al., 2009a
23.	Ae. kotschyi (UUSS)	Amphiploids	Iron, Zinc	Rawat et al., 2009b
24.	Ae. kotschyi (UUSS)	Amphiploids (AABBDDUkUkSkSk)	Macronutrients, Micronutrients	Tiwari et al., 2010
25.	Ae. kotschyi (UUSS)	DSLs 2S, 7U	Iron, Zinc	Tiwari et al., 2010
26.	Ae. kotschyi (UUSS)	DALs, DSL	Iron, Zinc	Rawat et al., 2011
27.	Ae. kotschyi (UUSS)	Hybrids	Iron, Zinc	Sheikh et al., 2018
28.	Ae. kotschyi (UUSS)	Hybrids with small alien introgression	Iron, Zinc	Verma et al., 2016a
29.	Ae. kotschyi (UUSS)	U/S introgression	Iron, Zinc	Verma et al., 2016b
30.	Ae. kotschyi (UUSS)	DSLs	Iron, Zinc	Sharma et al., 2018
31.	Ae. kotschyi (UUSS)	Hybrids	Iron, Zinc	Sharma et al., 2018
32.	Ae. kotschyi (UUSS)	Derivatives	Iron, Zinc	Sheikh et al., 2018
33.	Ae. kotschyi	Fine translocation line U/S	Iron, Zinc	Verma et al., 2016b
34.	Ae. peregrina (UUSS)	DALs	Iron, Zinc	Rawat et al., 2009a
35.	Ae. peregrina (UUSS)	Accessions and interspecific hybrids with Triticum aestivum	Iron, Zinc	Rawat et al., 2009a
36.	Ae. peregrina (UUSS)	DAL 4Sv	Iron, Zinc	Wang S. et al., 2011
37.	Ae. peregrina (UUSS)	DALs 2Sv, 2Uv, 7Uv	Iron, Zinc	Kumari et al., 2012
38.	Ae. peregrina (UUSS)	DSLs	Iron, Zinc	Sharma et al., 2018
39.	Ae. peregrina (UUSS)	Derivatives	Iron, Zinc	Sheikh et al., 2018
40.	Ae. peregrina (UUSS)	Hybrids	Iron, Zinc	Sharma et al., 2018

Disomic addition/substitution lines can be utilized to introgress useful variability of high grain Fe and Zn from Aegilops into wheat in form of short arm or fine chromosomal translocations through induced homoeologous pairing. Interspecific hybrids of Ae. longissima with T. turgidum (Tiwari et al., 2008) and Ae. kotschyi (Sheikh et al., 2018) produced after crossing addition /substitution lines with tetraploid and hexaploid wheat also showed elevated levels of grain iron and zinc content. Ae. biuncialis specific translocation line 3Mb.4BS (Farkas et al., 2014) and many U/S chromosome specific fine translocations of Ae. kotschyi in wheat (Verma et al., 2016a,b) have been produced with least linkage drag effect. These lines also showed significant increase in grain iron and zinc content.

Improvement in Phytochemicals Concentration

Studies on phytochemical contents of Aegilops species have been limited (Figure 3) with their work mainly being carried out in Europe (Figure 4). But given the rich genetic diversity of Aegilops, many phytochemicals such as phenolic acids, carotenoids, tocopherols, alkylresorcinols, benzoxazinoids, phytosterols and lignans can be explored in Aegilops species. Many phenolic diglycerides have been detected in Ae. geniculata (Cooper et al., 1978) (Table 6). p-hydroxybenzaldehyde, vanillin and mono-epoxylignanolide (MEL) have been detected in Ae. geniculata (Cooper et al., 1994). Alloplasmic lines derived from wheat and Ae. squarossa have been shown to increase the lutein content (Atienza et al., 2008). Synthetic hexaploid wheat (SHW) lines generated by crossing tetraploid durum wheat and Ae. tauschii also showed increased yellow pigment content and might be useful source for increasing carotenoids content in wheat (Li et al., 2015). DALs of Ae. geniculata and Ae. biuncalis showed increase in total protein content and polymeric proteins (Rakszegi et al., 2017) hence enhancing the nutritive value (Table 6).

Table 6

Aegilops species explored for phytochemicals and dietary fibers.

S.No.	Species	Source	Traits	Reference
1	Ae. speltoides (SS)	2140008	DIMBOA-glucoside	Elek et al., 2014
2	Ae. crassa (DDMM)	Recombinants of Triticale with Ae. crassa	Protein, dietary fiber, thousand kernel weight, volume weight	Boros et al., 2010
3	Ae. geniculata (MMUU)		Tricin and flavo-lignan	Cooper et al., 1977
4	Ae. geniculata (MMUU)		Scopoletin and p-coumaric acid	Cooper et al., 1978
5	Ae. geniculata (MMUU)	2Ug, 4Ug, 5Ug, 7Ug, 2Mg, 5Mg, 7Mg DALs	Protein content	Rakszegi et al., 2017
6	Ae. geniculata (MMUU)	1Ug, 1Mg DALs	Polymeric glutenin proteins	Rakszegi et al., 2017
7	Ae. geniculata (MMUU)	5Ug, 7Ug DALs	Arabinoxylan	Rakszegi et al., 2017
8	Ae. biuncialis (UUMM)	1Ub DAL	Arabinoxylan	Rakszegi et al., 2017
9	Ae. geniculata (MMUU)	5Ug, 5Mg,7Mg DALs	β-glucan	Rakszegi et al., 2017
10	Ae. biuncialis (UUMM)	3Ub, 2Mb, 3Mb, and 7Mb DALs	Protein	Rakszegi et al., 2017
11	Ae. biuncialis (UUMM)	5Ub, 5Mb, 7Mb DALs	β -glucan	Rakszegi et al., 2017
12	Ae. juvenalis (DDMMUU)	Recombinants of Triticale with Ae. juvenalis	Protein, dietary fiber, thousand kernel weight, volume weight	Boros et al., 2010

Improvement in Dietary Fibers Concentration

Dietary fibers are important components of wheat which impact processing quality and have many health benefits. The major components of dietary fibers in wheat grain are cell wall polysaccharides, arabinoxylan (AX) and (1-3)(1-4)- β-D-glucan (β-glucan). Both of these occur in soluble and insoluble forms with different health benefits such as reduced risks of type II diabetes, coronary heart diseases and prevention of colon cancer. Soluble forms of dietary fibers also include FODMAPs (Fermentable oligosaccharides, disaccharides, monosaccharides and polyols) which are a group short chain carbohydrates. A diet rich in FODMAPs is often associated with diseases like Crohn disease and irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), which is a chronic gastrointestinal disease (Khan et al., 2015). Dietary fiber components have been reported to affect processing quality of wheat in terms of bread making and starch gluten separation. Arabinoxylan have effects on water absorption and development time of dough (Courtin and Delcour, 1998). β-glucan confers high viscosity, higher water absorption, lower loaf volume, height and stiffer dough (Symons and Brennan, 2004; Cleary et al., 2007; Skendi et al., 2009). From nutrition point of view higher levels of β-glucan are sought in food products as they lower serum cholesterol levels and regulate glucose levels in blood (McIntosh et al., 1991; Cavallero et al., 2002). Variability and composition of dietary fibers have been extensively studied in wheat and related cereal grains. Wheat primary gene pool has been explored in the European HEALTHGRAIN cereal diversity screening project[1] for dietary fibers and other phytochemicals. However, such studies in wild species of wheat have been limited. There have been reports of recombinants of Triticale with Ae. crassa and Ae. juvenalis showing higher dietary fiber content along with increased values of total protein content, thousand kernel weight and volume weight (Boros et al., 2010) (Table 6). Both the species can be utilized for improving the nutrition value of wheat. Addition of 5Ug, 7Ug chromosome pairs of Ae. geniculata and 1Ub of Ae. biuncialis into wheat have resulted in increased arabinoxylan content (Rakszegi et al., 2017). Similarly, addition of 5Ug, 5Mg, and 7Mg chromosome pairs from Ae. geniculata and 5Ub, 5Mb, and 7Mb chromosomes from Ae. biuncialis have been reported to result in elevated levels of β-glucan content in wheat (Rakszegi et al., 2017). Since there is a large genetic diversity available in Aegilops species, they need to be explored for dietary fibers content and their potential use for enhancing nutritional value of wheat.

Conclusion

Quality and nutrition are two very important aspects of wheat research. Over the past few years, a lot of emphasis has been given by breeders worldwide to improve the end product quality of wheat and to develop varieties that meet specific end product and nutritional requirements. New sources of genetic variations in wheat are always sought after because of the narrow genetic diversity. Wild species of wheat can serve as excellent source of new variations that can be incorporated into wheat. Close relatedness to wheat makes Aegilops the most favorable genetic resource for wheat improvement through alien gene introgression. The basic approach for alien gene transfer is to cross the wild relative with wheat to generate interspecific hybrids followed by embryo rescue and colchicine treatment to double chromosomes. The amphiploids generated are then backcrossed multiple times with wheat to generate addition/substitution lines (Friebe et al., 1995, 1996, 1999). A large number of wheat-Aegilops amphiploids and chromosome addition/substitutions lines are available (Schneider et al., 2008). But these addition/substitution lines and amphiploids have no practical application in agriculture as the Aegilops chromosome segment carrying the gene of interest must be transferred to the wheat chromosome as translocation. The Ph1 locus, present at the long arm of chromosome 5B regulates chromosome pairing in wheat and ensures that only homologous chromosomes pair at metaphase. To generate translocations between wheat chromosome and alien chromosome, Ph1 mutants or Ph1 suppressors can be used to bypass the Ph1 control mechanism of homologous pairing. Translocations can also be generated via radiation induced chromosome breaks followed by random recombination. The recombinants generated then need to be screened using chromosome pairing, C banding pattern and in situ hybridization. Thus, the whole process of alien gene transfer is laborious and time consuming. However, with technological advancements and development of new high throughput marker technologies it is now possible to identify desirable recombinants from a large population with great precision and efficiency (Niu et al., 2011; Tiwari et al., 2014).

A large number of countries throughout the world are participating in the exploration of Aegilops. HMW GS are most explored, while phytochemicals are least explored among different research groups across the world. Gliadins have been explored by highest number of countries while, LMW GS and phytochemicals are least explored around the world (Figure 3). Based on this review we are aware that more than 95 subunits of HMW GS, 51 novel alleles of LMW GS, 34 alleles for Pin a, 40 alleles for Pin b and 26 alleles for GSP in Aegilops have been reported across multiple accessions, synthetic lines, addition/substitution lines and translocation lines (Figure 3). These can serve as excellent genetic sources of variation for wheat quality improvement. Large numbers of publications have arisen for Aegilops exploration for improvement of nutrition and processing quality. Highest exploration has been carried out in China and Europe followed by Japan and India (Figure 4). Major work on LMW GS has been carried out in China, Fe/Zn in India, others having good distribution across countries (Figure 4). More than 14 species of Aegilops have been proven to be excellent sources for the improvement of grain micronutrient content, protein content, dietary fiber content and phytochemical content. Many Aegilops species have already been incorporated in various breeding programs across the world. Still there is further need to explore Aegilops species to identify new variations. Though a large number of accessions are available in gene banks, many accessions of Aegilops species still remain unexploited. The real bottleneck for introgressing useful genes into wheat from Aegilops, however, is the generation of fine translocation lines containing the smallest possible segment of alien chromosome with the gene of interest. Although a lot of scientific exploration has been carried out, practically we still are nowhere in terms of introgressing and utilizing genes related to quality and nutrition from Aegilops species. There is still a long way to go. It is anticipated that the availability of the newly annotated wheat genome sequence (International Wheat Genome Sequencing Consortium, Appels et al., 2018) along with new genomic tools and genetic resources will aid the further exploration and exploitation of Aegilops species and the transfer of useful traits into wheat.

Author Contributions

AK and MG built the layout of article. AK, MG, and PK collected the literature. AK wrote the article. MG, VC, SS, and PK helped in manuscript editing. PK did the reference management. All authors prepared images and tables.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.