Literature DB >> 3093667

Relative bioavailability of a new transdermal nitroglycerin delivery system.

P K Noonan, M A Gonzalez, D Ruggirello, J Tomlinson, E Babcock-Atkinson, M Ray, A Golub, A Cohen.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to measure the bioavailability of nitroglycerin from a new transdermal delivery system, Nitro-Dur II, relative to that of Nitro-Dur. Twenty-four healthy male volunteers completed a two-way crossover study. Each subject randomly received Nitro-Dur (I) and Nitro-Dur II (II) for a 24-h period. Both transdermal systems had an active surface area of 20 cm2. Blood samples were collected immediately before treatment, at 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 18, and 24 h after topical application of the units, and 30 min after the units were removed. Nitroglycerin was determined with an analytical sensitivity of 50 pg/mL using gas chromatography with electron capture detection (GC-EC). Mean steady-state concentrations of nitroglycerin were 182 and 224 pg/mL for I and II, respectively. There were no statistical differences between I and II in the pharmacokinetic parameters measured (Css, AUC, Cmax, % fluctuation). Residual nitroglycerin content was measured in each transdermal unit after application to each of the 24 volunteers. The amounts of nitroglycerin delivered by I and II were 9.78 +/- 4.11 and 10.67 +/- 4.78 mg, respectively, or approximately 10 mg in 24 h. Statistical analysis of these data using an analysis of variance indicated no significant difference between these treatments (p = 0.27). Since there were also no differences in the plasma concentrations and pharmacokinetic parameters calculated after treatment with I and II, the bioequivalence of the two delivery systems was established.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3093667     DOI: 10.1002/jps.2600750715

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pharm Sci        ISSN: 0022-3549            Impact factor:   3.534


  8 in total

1.  Novel pharmacokinetic modelling of transdermal nitroglycerin.

Authors:  B Auclair; G Sirois; A H Ngoc; M P Ducharme
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 4.200

Review 2.  Intermittent or continuous transdermal nitroglycerin: still an issue, or is the case closed?

Authors:  T O Klemsdal; K Gjesdal
Journal:  Cardiovasc Drugs Ther       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 3.727

Review 3.  Various administration forms of nitrates and their possibilities.

Authors:  U E Jonsson
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 4.  Pharmacokinetic considerations in the use of newer transdermal formulations.

Authors:  G Ridout; G C Santus; R H Guy
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1988-08       Impact factor: 6.447

5.  Physicians cannot be educated in isolation from public concerns, ACMC conference told.

Authors:  E LeBourdais
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1994-07-01       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 6.  Transdermal nitroglycerin (glyceryl trinitrate). A review of its pharmacology and therapeutic use.

Authors:  P A Todd; K L Goa; H D Langtry
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 7.  Clinical pharmacokinetics of nitrates.

Authors:  M G Bogaert
Journal:  Cardiovasc Drugs Ther       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 3.727

8.  Nitroglycerin absorption from transdermal systems: formulation effects and metabolite concentrations.

Authors:  R L Williams; K M Thakker; V John; E T Lin; W Liang-Gee; L Z Benet
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 4.200

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.