Literature DB >> 30935820

Associations Between Hospital Maternal Service Level and Delivery Outcomes.

Jennifer Vanderlaan1, Roger Rochat2, Bryan Williams3, Anne Dunlop3, Susan E Shapiro3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study explored the associations between delivery hospital self-reported level of maternal service, as defined by the American Hospital Association, and both maternal and neonatal outcomes among women at high maternal risk, as defined by the Obstetric Comorbidity Index.
METHODS: This was a secondary analysis of linked delivery hospitalization discharge and vital records data for women experiencing singleton births in Georgia from 2008 to 2012. The need for maternal transfer was defined using a sample-specific cut-off of the risk score calculated using the Obstetric Comorbidity Index. Outcomes included poor maternal outcome (severe maternal morbidity or death), maternal length of stay, preterm delivery, low birth weight, and perinatal death. The analysis was completed using hierarchical logistic regression with a two-level model considering hospital level of maternal service and controlling for maternal race and transfer status.
RESULTS: In these data, there was no difference in the odds of a poor maternal or neonatal outcome according to delivery hospital level of maternal care; however, delivery at a hospital with maternal service level III was associated with a higher odds of an extended length of stay.
CONCLUSIONS: For this group of pregnant women in need of maternal transfer, delivery hospital self-reported level of maternal care was not associated with the odds of poor maternal or neonatal outcomes. This study supports the need for improved definitions of hospital level of maternal services.
Copyright © 2019 Jacobs Institute of Women's Health. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30935820     DOI: 10.1016/j.whi.2019.02.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Womens Health Issues        ISSN: 1049-3867


  6 in total

Review 1.  Data Science Methods for Nursing-Relevant Patient Outcomes and Clinical Processes: The 2019 Literature Year in Review.

Authors:  Mary Anne Schultz; Rachel Lane Walden; Kenrick Cato; Cynthia Peltier Coviak; Christopher Cruz; Fabio D'Agostino; Brian J Douthit; Thompson Forbes; Grace Gao; Mikyoung Angela Lee; Deborah Lekan; Ann Wieben; Alvin D Jeffery
Journal:  Comput Inform Nurs       Date:  2021-05-06       Impact factor: 1.985

2.  The maternal referral mobile application system for minimizing the risk of childbirth.

Authors:  Diah Indriani; Nyoman Anita Damayanti; Danu Teguh; Muhammad Ardian; Hud Suhargono; Satriawansyah Urbaya; Ratna Dwi Wulandari; Triska Susila Nindya; Ernawaty Ernawaty; Nuzulul Kusuma Putri; Ilham Akhsanu Ridlo
Journal:  J Public Health Res       Date:  2020-07-02

3.  Methodology for sampling women at high maternal risk in administrative data.

Authors:  Jennifer Vanderlaan; Anne Dunlop; Roger Rochat; Bryan Williams; Susan E Shapiro
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2019-10-21       Impact factor: 3.007

Review 4.  A scoping review of severe maternal morbidity: describing risk factors and methodological approaches to inform population-based surveillance.

Authors:  Lisa M Korst; Kimberly D Gregory; Lisa A Nicholas; Samia Saeb; David J Reynen; Jennifer L Troyan; Naomi Greene; Moshe Fridman
Journal:  Matern Health Neonatol Perinatol       Date:  2021-01-06

5.  Identifying individual hospital levels of maternal care using administrative data.

Authors:  Sara C Handley; Molly Passarella; Sindhu K Srinivas; Scott A Lorch
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2021-06-02       Impact factor: 2.655

6.  Geospatial variation in caesarean delivery.

Authors:  Jennifer Vanderlaan; Johnathan A Edwards; Anne Dunlop
Journal:  Nurs Open       Date:  2020-01-04
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.