Literature DB >> 30935282

Lower Rate of Restenosis and Reinterventions With Covered vs Bare Metal Stents Following Innominate Artery Stenting.

Myriam Ammi1, Samir Henni2, Lucie Salomon Du Mont3, Nicla Settembre4, Hélène Loubiere1, Jonathan Sobocinski5, Yann Gouëffic6, Patrick Feugier7, Ambroise Duprey8, Robert Martinez9, Michel Bartoli10, Raphael Coscas11, Xavier Chaufour12, Adrien Kaladji13, Eugenio Rosset14, Pierre Abraham2, Jean Picquet1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine any difference between bare metal stents (BMS) and balloon-expandable covered stents in the treatment of innominate artery atheromatous lesions.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A multicenter retrospective study involving 13 university hospitals in France collected 93 patients (mean age 63.2±11.1 years; 57 men) treated over a 10-year period. All patients had systolic blood pressure asymmetry >15 mm Hg and were either asymptomatic (39, 42%) or had carotid (20, 22%), vertebrobasilar (24, 26%), and/or brachial (20, 22%) symptoms. Innominate artery stenosis ranged from 50% to 70% in 4 (4%) symptomatic cases and between 70% and 90% in 52 (56%) cases; 28 (30%) lesions were preocclusive and 8 (9%) were occluded. One (1%) severely symptomatic patient had a <50% stenosis. Demographic characteristics, operative indications, and procedure details were compared between the covered (36, 39%) and BMS (57, 61%) groups. Multivariate analysis was performed to determine relative risks of restenosis and reinterventions [reported with 95% confidence intervals (CI)].
RESULTS: The endovascular procedures were performed mainly via retrograde carotid access (75, 81%). Perioperative strokes occurred in 4 (4.3%) patients. During the mean 34.5±31.2-month follow-up, 30 (32%) restenoses were detected and 13 (20%) reinterventions were performed. Relative risks were 6.9 (95% CI 2.2 to 22.2, p=0.001) for restenosis and 14.6 (95% CI 1.8 to 120.8, p=0.004) for reinterventions between BMS and covered stents. The severity of the treated lesions had no influence on the results.
CONCLUSION: Patients treated with BMS for innominate artery stenosis have more frequent restenoses and reinterventions than patients treated with covered stents.

Entities:  

Keywords:  atherosclerosis; balloon-expandable covered stent; brachiocephalic artery; innominate artery; occlusion; reintervention; restenosis; stenosis; stent

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30935282     DOI: 10.1177/1526602819838867

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endovasc Ther        ISSN: 1526-6028            Impact factor:   3.487


  3 in total

1.  Technique for transcarotid artery revascularization of tandem lesions.

Authors:  Gregory A Magee; Helen A Potter
Journal:  J Vasc Surg Cases Innov Tech       Date:  2021-01-28

2.  Endovascular Stent Grafting for Recurrent Strokes Due to Fragile Innominate Artery Plaque: A Case Report.

Authors:  Takaaki Ishikawa; Tomosato Yamazaki; Masataka Sato; Noriyuki Kato; Eiichi Ishikawa; Yuji Matsumaru; Akira Matsumura
Journal:  NMC Case Rep J       Date:  2021-04-02

3.  Management of Innominate Artery Occlusion With Severe Left Common Carotid Artery Stenosis.

Authors:  Justin M George; Peter V Cooke; Nicole Ilonzo; Rami O Tadros; Robert J Grossi
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2021-11-15
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.