Jason I Chen1,2, Ginnifer L Mastarone1,3, Santisia A Ambrosino1, Nicole Anzalone1, Kathleen F Carlson1,3, Steven K Dobscha1,2, Alan R Teo1,2. 1. Center to Improve Veteran Involvement in Care, VA Portland Health Care System, US Department of Veterans Affairs (VA), Portland, OR, USA. 2. Department of Psychiatry, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA. 3. Oregon Health and Science University-Portland State University School of Public Health, Portland, OR, USA.
Abstract
Background: Recent data show many veterans who die by suicide are not currently engaged in mental health care. Veterans frequently use the Internet for health information and may look online for community resources when in distress. However, little is known about their design characteristics. Aim: To evaluate the design and content of community, veteran suicide prevention websites. Method: Community websites focused on veteran suicide prevention were gathered through Internet searches using standardized search terms. Websites that met the inclusion criteria (n = 9) were evaluated for adherence to suicide safe messaging, usability, readability, and credibility heuristics. Interrater reliability was evaluated using kappa statistics. Descriptive statistics were used to describe website features. Results: Community websites tended to provide help-seeking information, safe messaging, and community activities. However, no websites provided information on lethal means safety or references to signal credibility. Limitations: The sample was small and only included English-language websites, and focused on veteran-oriented, community websites. Conclusion: Community suicide prevention websites focused on veterans could be improved through increased readability, credibility, and provision of lethal means safety information.
Background: Recent data show many veterans who die by suicide are not currently engaged in mental health care. Veterans frequently use the Internet for health information and may look online for community resources when in distress. However, little is known about their design characteristics. Aim: To evaluate the design and content of community, veteran suicide prevention websites. Method: Community websites focused on veteran suicide prevention were gathered through Internet searches using standardized search terms. Websites that met the inclusion criteria (n = 9) were evaluated for adherence to suicide safe messaging, usability, readability, and credibility heuristics. Interrater reliability was evaluated using kappa statistics. Descriptive statistics were used to describe website features. Results: Community websites tended to provide help-seeking information, safe messaging, and community activities. However, no websites provided information on lethal means safety or references to signal credibility. Limitations: The sample was small and only included English-language websites, and focused on veteran-oriented, community websites. Conclusion: Community suicide prevention websites focused on veterans could be improved through increased readability, credibility, and provision of lethal means safety information.
Authors: Paul S F Yip; Eric Caine; Saman Yousuf; Shu-Sen Chang; Kevin Chien-Chang Wu; Ying-Yeh Chen Journal: Lancet Date: 2012-06-23 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Edison J Trickett; Sarah Beehler; Charles Deutsch; Lawrence W Green; Penelope Hawe; Kenneth McLeroy; Robin Lin Miller; Bruce D Rapkin; Jean J Schensul; Amy J Schulz; Joseph E Trimble Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2011-06-16 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: John W Ayers; Benjamin M Althouse; Eric C Leas; Mark Dredze; Jon-Patrick Allem Journal: JAMA Intern Med Date: 2017-10-01 Impact factor: 21.873
Authors: S Clement; O Schauman; T Graham; F Maggioni; S Evans-Lacko; N Bezborodovs; C Morgan; N Rüsch; J S L Brown; G Thornicroft Journal: Psychol Med Date: 2014-02-26 Impact factor: 7.723
Authors: Eubanks Fleming; Eric F Crawford; Patrick S Calhoun; Harold Kudler; Kristy A Straits-Troster Journal: Mil Med Date: 2016-02 Impact factor: 1.437