Yu-Wei Liu1,2, Hao-Wei Chen1,3, Jui-Ying Lee1,2, Hung-Hsing Chiang1, Hsien-Pin Li1,2, Po-Chih Chang1, Shah-Hwa Chou1,4. 1. Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan. 2. Graduate Institute of Clinical Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan. 3. Department of Urology, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan. 4. Department of Surgery, Pingtung Hospital, Ministry of Health and Welfare, Pingtung, Taiwan.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The omission of chest tubes after thoracoscopic procedures such as sympathectomy, lung biopsy, and lung resection has proven efficacious in decreasing pain and length of hospital stay in some cases. However, its safety for mediastinal diseases remains unclear. This study evaluated the feasibility and outcome of eliminating chest drains after video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) for mediastinal tumor resection. METHODS: We retrospectively investigated 70 patients receiving VATS mediastinal tumor resection in a single institution between January 2016 and November 2018. A total of 39 patients (drain group) received postoperative chest drains and 31 patients (no-drain group) did not. Group clinical outcomes and operation data were compared. A propensity score matching analysis was further performed to yield a fairer comparison. RESULTS: Before propensity score matching, the no-drain group had a higher prevalence of cystic lesions, a shorter operative time, and less blood loss compared with the drain group (p = 0.015, p = 0.018, and p < 0.001, respectively). After matching, the group differences in these perioperative variables lost significance (p = 0.095, 0.4, and 0.2, respectively). The no-drain group had lower postoperative day 2 pain scores and shorter postoperative hospital stays than the drain group, regardless of whether they were matched (pain: p = 0.028; hospital stay < 0.001) or not (pain: p = 0.003; hospital stay < 0.001). No major adverse events occurred in either group during hospitalization or follow-up period. CONCLUSION: Eliminating chest drain placement after VATS mediastinal tumor resection may benefit some patients and decrease postoperative pain and hospital stay without increasing complications or compromising patient safety. Thieme. All rights reserved.
BACKGROUND: The omission of chest tubes after thoracoscopic procedures such as sympathectomy, lung biopsy, and lung resection has proven efficacious in decreasing pain and length of hospital stay in some cases. However, its safety for mediastinal diseases remains unclear. This study evaluated the feasibility and outcome of eliminating chest drains after video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) for mediastinal tumor resection. METHODS: We retrospectively investigated 70 patients receiving VATS mediastinal tumor resection in a single institution between January 2016 and November 2018. A total of 39 patients (drain group) received postoperative chest drains and 31 patients (no-drain group) did not. Group clinical outcomes and operation data were compared. A propensity score matching analysis was further performed to yield a fairer comparison. RESULTS: Before propensity score matching, the no-drain group had a higher prevalence of cystic lesions, a shorter operative time, and less blood loss compared with the drain group (p = 0.015, p = 0.018, and p < 0.001, respectively). After matching, the group differences in these perioperative variables lost significance (p = 0.095, 0.4, and 0.2, respectively). The no-drain group had lower postoperative day 2 pain scores and shorter postoperative hospital stays than the drain group, regardless of whether they were matched (pain: p = 0.028; hospital stay < 0.001) or not (pain: p = 0.003; hospital stay < 0.001). No major adverse events occurred in either group during hospitalization or follow-up period. CONCLUSION: Eliminating chest drain placement after VATS mediastinal tumor resection may benefit some patients and decrease postoperative pain and hospital stay without increasing complications or compromising patient safety. Thieme. All rights reserved.
Authors: Lin Huang; Henrik Kehlet; Bo Laksáfoss Holbek; Tina Kold Jensen; René Horsleben Petersen Journal: J Thorac Dis Date: 2021-02 Impact factor: 3.005