Literature DB >> 30933939

Direct measurement of ion chamber correction factors, k Q and k B, in a 7 MV MRI-linac.

Leon de Prez1, Simon Woodings, Jacco de Pooter, Bram van Asselen, Jochem Wolthaus, Bartel Jansen, Bas Raaymakers.   

Abstract

The output of MRI-integrated photon therapy (MRgXT) devices is measured in terms of absorbed dose to water, D w. Traditionally this is done with reference type ion chambers calibrated in a beam quality Q 0 without magnetic field. To correct the ion chamber response for the application in the magnetic field, a factor needs to be applied that corrects for both beam quality Q and the presence of the magnetic field B, k Q,B. This can be expressed as the product of k Q, without magnetic field, and ion chamber magnetic field correction, k B. k B depends on the magnetic field strength and its direction, the direction of the beam and the orientation and type of the ion chamber. In this study, for the first time, both k Q and k B were measured directly for six waterproof ion chambers (3  ×  PTW 30013 and 3  ×  IBA FC65-G) in a pre-clinical 7 MV MRI-linac at 0 T and at 1.5 T. Measurements were done with the only available primary standard built for this purpose, a water calorimeter. Resulting k Q factors for PTW and IBA chambers were 0.985(5) and 0.990(4), respectively. k B factors were measured with the chambers in antiparallel direction to the magnetic field (|| 180°), and perpendicular direction (⊥  -90°). k B|| and k B⊥ for the PTW chambers were 0.985(6) and 0.963(4), respectively and for IBA chambers 0.995(4) and 0.956(4). Agreement with the available literature values was shown, partly caused by the relatively large standard deviation (SD) in those values. The values in this study are currently the only available measured values for k Q and k B in an MRI-linac that are directly linked to the international traceability framework for the quantity absorbed dose to water, D w.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30933939     DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ab1511

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  3 in total

1.  Influence of beam quality on reference dosimetry correction factors in magnetic resonance guided radiation therapy.

Authors:  Stefan Pojtinger; Marcel Nachbar; Ralf-Peter Kapsch; Daniela Thorwarth
Journal:  Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol       Date:  2020-10-27

2.  Dosimetric evaluation of irradiation geometry and potential air gaps in an acrylic miniphantom used for external audit of absolute dose calibration for a hybrid 1.5 T MR-linac system.

Authors:  Neelam Tyagi; Ergys Subashi; Dale Michael Lovelock; Stephen Kry; Paola Elisa Alvarez; Margie A Hunt; Seng Boh Lim
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2021-12-16       Impact factor: 2.102

Review 3.  Medical physics challenges in clinical MR-guided radiotherapy.

Authors:  Christopher Kurz; Giulia Buizza; Guillaume Landry; Florian Kamp; Moritz Rabe; Chiara Paganelli; Guido Baroni; Michael Reiner; Paul J Keall; Cornelis A T van den Berg; Marco Riboldi
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2020-05-05       Impact factor: 3.481

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.