Literature DB >> 30933925

Opioid-free anesthesia within an enhanced recovery after surgery pathway for minimally invasive lumbar spine surgery: a retrospective matched cohort study.

Ellen M Soffin1,2, Douglas S Wetmore1,2, James D Beckman1,2, Evan D Sheha3, Avani S Vaishnav3, Todd J Albert3,4, Catherine H Gang3, Sheeraz A Qureshi3,4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVEEnhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) and multimodal analgesia are established care models that minimize perioperative opioid consumption and promote positive outcomes after spine surgery. Opioid-free anesthesia (OFA) is an emerging technique that may achieve similar goals. The purpose of this study was to evaluate an OFA regimen within an ERAS pathway for lumbar decompressive surgery and to compare perioperative opioid requirements in a matched cohort of patients managed with traditional opioid-containing anesthesia (OCA).METHODSThe authors performed a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data. They included 36 patients who underwent lumbar decompression under their ERAS pathway for spinal decompression between February and August 2018. Eighteen patients who received OFA were matched in a 1:1 ratio to a cohort managed with a traditional OCA regimen. The primary outcome was total perioperative opioid consumption. Postoperative pain scores (measured using the numerical rating scale [NRS]), opioid consumption (total morphine equivalents), and length of stay (time to readiness for discharge) were compared in the postanesthesia care unit (PACU). The authors also assessed compliance with ERAS process measures and compared compliance during 3 phases of care: pre-, intra-, and postoperative.RESULTSThere was a significant reduction in total perioperative opioid consumption in patients who received OFA (2.43 ± 0.86 oral morphine equivalents [OMEs]; mean ± SEM), compared to patients who received OCA (38.125 ± 6.11 OMEs). There were no significant differences in worst postoperative pain scores (NRS scores 2.55 ± 0.70 vs 2.58 ± 0.73) or opioid consumption (5.28 ± 1.7 vs 4.86 ± 1.5 OMEs) in the PACU between OFA and OCA groups, respectively. There was a clinically significant decrease in time to readiness for discharge from the PACU associated with OFA (37 minutes), although this was not statistically significantly different. The authors found high overall compliance with ERAS process measures (91.4%) but variation in compliance according to phase of care. The highest compliance occurred during the preoperative phase (94.71% ± 2.88%), and the lowest compliance occurred during the postoperative phase of care (85.4% ± 5.7%).CONCLUSIONSOFA within an ERAS pathway for lumbar spinal decompression represents an opportunity to minimize perioperative opioid exposure without adversely affecting pain control or recovery. This study reveals opportunities for patient and provider education to reinforce ERAS and highlights the postoperative phase of care as a time when resources should be focused to increase ERAS adherence.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ASA = American Society of Anesthesiologists; ERAS; ERAS = enhanced recovery after surgery; LOS = length of stay; MAC = minimum alveolar concentration; MIS = minimally invasive surgical; MMA = multimodal analgesia; NRS = numerical rating scale; OCA = opioid-containing anesthesia; OFA = opioid-free anesthesia; OIH = opioid-induced hyperalgesia; OME = oral morphine equivalent; PACU = postanesthesia care unit; PONV = postoperative nausea and vomiting; enhanced recovery after surgery; lumbar decompression; opioid epidemic; opioid-free anesthesia; spine surgery

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30933925     DOI: 10.3171/2019.1.FOCUS18645

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurg Focus        ISSN: 1092-0684            Impact factor:   4.047


  23 in total

1.  Opioid use and abuse following video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) or thoracotomy lung cancer surgery.

Authors:  Tamar B Nobel; Prasad S Adusumilli; Daniela Molena
Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res       Date:  2019-12

2.  Effects of a multimodal analgesic pathway with transversus abdominis plane block for lumbar spine fusion: a prospective feasibility trial.

Authors:  Ellen M Soffin; Carrie Freeman; Alexander P Hughes; Douglas S Wetmore; Stavros G Memtsoudis; Federico P Girardi; Haoyan Zhong; James D Beckman
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2019-07-27       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Response to Letter to the Editor by Soffin et al.

Authors:  Elliot D K Cha; Conor P Lynch; James M Parrish; Nathaniel W Jenkins; Asokumar Buvanendran; Kern Singh
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2021-10-08

4.  Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol in spine surgery.

Authors:  Tungish Bansal; Alok D Sharan; Bhavuk Garg
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2022-07-09

5.  Surgeon-Placed Erector Spinae Plane Catheters for Multilevel Lumbar Spine Fusion: Technique and Outcomes Compared With Single-Shot Blocks.

Authors:  Lisa Oezel; Alexander P Hughes; Artine Arzani; Ichiro Okano; Dominik Adl Amini; Manuel Moser; Andrew A Sama; Frank P Cammisa; Ellen M Soffin
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2022-07-14

6.  Analysis of Opioid Use in Patients Undergoing Open Versus Robotic Gastrectomy.

Authors:  Yuki Hirata; Russell G Witt; Laura R Prakash; Elsa M Arvide; Kristen A Robinson; Vijaya Gottumukkala; Ching-Wei D Tzeng; Paul Mansfield; Brian D Badgwell; Naruhiko Ikoma
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2022-05-04       Impact factor: 4.339

7.  SRS-22r question 11 is a valid opioid screen and stratifies opioid consumption.

Authors:  Paul Inclan; Travis S CreveCoeur; Shay Bess; Jeffrey L Gum; Breton G Line; Lawrence G Lenke; Michael P Kelly
Journal:  Spine Deform       Date:  2022-01-27

Review 8.  Complication avoidance and management in ambulatory spine surgery.

Authors:  Evan D Sheha; Peter B Derman
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2019-09

9.  Is an opioid-free anaesthesia possible without using alpha-2 agonists?

Authors:  Marija Toleska; Aleksandar Dimitrovski
Journal:  Indian J Anaesth       Date:  2020-05-01

Review 10.  Opioid free anesthesia: feasible?

Authors:  Pamela A Chia; Maxime Cannesson; Christine C Myo Bui
Journal:  Curr Opin Anaesthesiol       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 2.733

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.