Literature DB >> 30933839

Changing institutional incentives to foster sound scientific practices: One department.

Rebecca A Lundwall1.   

Abstract

Replicable research and open science are of value to our field and to society at large, but most universities provide no incentives to adopt these practices. Instead, current incentive structures favor novel research, which has led to a situation in which few researchers take the time to do replications, share protocols, or share data. Obviously, several approaches to remedy this situation are possible. However, little progress can be made if becoming involved in such activities reduces a researcher's chances of rank and status advancement and other rewards. I describe in this article the way my department has modified our incentive structure to tackle this problem, including how the changes influence my research as a developmental psychologist. Finally, I offer suggestions for faculty who wish to initiate similar changes in their institutions.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Employee incentives; Institutional incentive structure; Open science; Replication studies

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30933839     DOI: 10.1016/j.infbeh.2019.03.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Infant Behav Dev        ISSN: 0163-6383


  1 in total

1.  Framework for advancing rigorous research.

Authors:  Devon C Crawford; Shai D Silberberg; Walter J Koroshetz; Shannon Behrman; Cynthia J Brame; Janet L Branchaw; Emery N Brown; Erin A Clark; David Dockterman; Jordan J Elm; Pamela L Gay; Katelyn M Green; Sherry Hsi; Michael G Kaplitt; Benedict J Kolber; Alex L Kolodkin; Diane Lipscombe; Malcolm R MacLeod; Caleb C McKinney; Marcus R Munafò; Barbara Oakley; Jeffrey T Olimpo; Nathalie Percie du Sert; Indira M Raman; Ceri Riley; Amy L Shelton; Stephen Miles Uzzo
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-03-04       Impact factor: 8.140

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.