Literature DB >> 30933596

Medicare's Bundled Payments For Care Improvement Initiative Maintained Quality Of Care For Vulnerable Patients.

Brandon C Maughan1, Daver C Kahvecioglu2, Grecia Marrufo3, Gina M Gerding4, Syvart Dennen5, Jaclyn K Marshall6, Daniel M Cooper7, Colleen M Kummet8, Laura A Dummit9.   

Abstract

The Bundled Payments for Care Improvement (BPCI) initiative established four models to test whether linking payments for an episode of care could reduce Medicare payments while maintaining or improving quality. Evaluations concluded that model 2, the largest, generally lowered payments without reducing quality for the average beneficiary, but these global results could mask adverse findings among vulnerable subpopulations. We analyzed changes in emergency department visits, unplanned hospital readmissions, and all-cause mortality within ninety days of hospital discharge among beneficiaries with one or more of three vulnerable characteristics-dementia, dual eligibility for Medicare and Medicaid, and recent institutional care-in 105,458 beneficiary episodes in the period October 2013-December 2016. The results for twelve types of medical and surgical BPCI episodes were evaluated relative to results in matched comparison groups. Our findings suggest that BPCI model 2 did not adversely affect care quality for beneficiaries with vulnerabilities. While this conclusion does not discourage the further development of bundled payment models, policy makers should support ongoing research to ensure that vulnerable populations are not adversely affected by these approaches.

Entities:  

Keywords:  BPCI; Dementia; Model 2; bundled payment; dually eligible; institutional care; vulnerable populations

Year:  2019        PMID: 30933596     DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.2018.05146

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)        ISSN: 0278-2715            Impact factor:   6.301


  7 in total

1.  Year 1 of the Bundled Payments for Care Improvement-Advanced Model.

Authors:  Karen E Joynt Maddox; E John Orav; Jie Zheng; Arnold M Epstein
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2021-08-12       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  The Proportion of Marginalized Individuals in US Communities and Hospital Participation in Bundled Payments.

Authors:  Joshua M Liao; Said A Ibrahim; Qian Huang; John Connolly; Deborah S Cousins; Jingsan Zhu; Amol S Navathe
Journal:  Popul Health Manag       Date:  2022-05-09       Impact factor: 2.290

3.  Impact of Medicare's Bundled Payments Initiative on Patient Selection, Payments, and Outcomes for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention and Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting.

Authors:  Christian McNeely; E John Orav; Jie Zheng; Karen E Joynt Maddox
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes       Date:  2020-09-01

4.  Predictors of Success in the Bundled Payments for Care Improvement Program.

Authors:  Jonathan D Wolfe; Arnold M Epstein; Jie Zheng; E John Orav; Karen E Joynt Maddox
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2021-05-04       Impact factor: 5.128

5.  Randomized trial shows healthcare payment reform has equal-sized spillover effects on patients not targeted by reform.

Authors:  Liran Einav; Amy Finkelstein; Yunan Ji; Neale Mahoney
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-07-27       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  The Impact of Payment Reforms on the Quality and Utilisation of Healthcare for Patients With Multimorbidity: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Toine E P Remers; Nina Nieuweweme; Simone A van Dulmen; Marcel Olde Rikkert; Patrick P T Jeurissen
Journal:  Int J Integr Care       Date:  2022-02-10       Impact factor: 5.120

7.  Association of Discharge to Home vs Institutional Postacute Care With Outcomes After Lower Extremity Joint Replacement.

Authors:  Robert E Burke; Anne Canamucio; Elina Medvedeva; Eric L Hume; Amol S Navathe
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2020-10-01
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.