Literature DB >> 30933438

Comparison of cytocentrifugation supernatant fluid and formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue for targeted next-generation sequencing.

Nafiseh Janaki1,2, Aparna Harbhajanka1,2, Claire W Michael1,2, Phillip Bomeisl1,2, Jay Wasman1,2, Maureen Atchley1, Kristina Miskiewicz1, David Alouani1,2, Navid Sadri1,2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The emergence of less invasive procedures coupled with the growth of molecular testing have created a need for clinical laboratories to optimize workflows to enable tissue preservation and ancillary testing. In the preparation of formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded cell blocks (FFPE CBs), there is a cytocentrifugation step for cell pellet extraction that results in postcentrifugation supernatant fluid (SN). This SN, which in most routine workflows is discarded, has been suggested to contain adequate cellular material for molecular testing. In the current study, the authors describe the use of DNA and RNA extracted from SN for the detection of clinically relevant biomarkers by next-generation sequencing (NGS).
METHODS: After cell pellet removal, cytocentrifugation SN from 30 endobronchial fine-needle aspiration rinses that were positive for malignancy on FFPE CB were collected. DNA and RNA were extracted from the SN and tested using an in-house NGS Solid Tumor Focus Assay. The NGS results were compared with findings from corresponding FFPE samples.
RESULTS: Testing was successful in all 30 samples. There was 100% concordance between variants observed in the SN and corresponding FFPE specimens, which included 50 single-nucleotide variants, 9 copy number amplifications, 3 structural variants, and 2 indels. Furthermore, there was excellent correlation (correlation coefficient, 0.93) between the variant allele frequency of mutations observed in SN compared with that noted in corresponding FFPE CBs.
CONCLUSIONS: Cytocentrifugation SN is a valuable source for NGS, is comparable to FFPE that preserves tissue for other ancillary testing, and can reduce the failure rate of testing that may result from insufficient material being available in the CB.
© 2019 American Cancer Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cytology; fine-needle aspiration; molecular testing; next-generation sequencing; supernatant fluid

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30933438     DOI: 10.1002/cncy.22126

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Cytopathol        ISSN: 1934-662X            Impact factor:   5.284


  4 in total

Review 1.  Next Generation Sequencing in Cytopathology: Focus on Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Pasquale Pisapia; Francesco Pepe; Antonino Iaccarino; Roberta Sgariglia; Mariantonia Nacchio; Floriana Conticelli; Maria Salatiello; Rossella Tufano; Gianluca Russo; Gianluca Gragnano; Ilaria Girolami; Albino Eccher; Umberto Malapelle; Giancarlo Troncone
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-02-11

2.  Accuracy of next-generation sequencing for molecular profiling of small specimen of lung cancer: a prospective pilot study of side-by-side comparison.

Authors:  Xiaosong Ben; Dan Tian; Weitao Zhuang; Rixin Chen; Sichao Wang; Zihao Zhou; Cheng Deng; Ruiqing Shi; Songlin Liu; Dongkun Zhang; Jiming Tang; Liang Xie; Haiyu Zhou; Zhou Zhang; Min Li; Xuanye Zhang; Guibin Qiao
Journal:  Diagn Pathol       Date:  2022-10-12       Impact factor: 3.196

Review 3.  Liquid Biopsy of Non-Plasma Body Fluids in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Look Closer to the Tumor!

Authors:  Lucile Durin; Anne Pradines; Céline Basset; Bryan Ulrich; Laura Keller; Vincent Dongay; Gilles Favre; Julien Mazieres; Nicolas Guibert
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2020-11-16       Impact factor: 6.600

Review 4.  Next generation sequencing in cytology.

Authors:  Pasquale Pisapia; Francesco Pepe; Roberta Sgariglia; Mariantonia Nacchio; Gianluca Russo; Floriana Conticelli; Ilaria Girolami; Albino Eccher; Claudio Bellevicine; Elena Vigliar; Umberto Malapelle; Giancarlo Troncone
Journal:  Cytopathology       Date:  2021-04-01       Impact factor: 2.073

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.