Literature DB >> 30931485

Surgical Options for Locally Advanced Oropharyngeal Cancer.

Hannan A Qureshi1, Marianne Abouyared1, Brittany Barber1, Jeffrey J Houlton2.   

Abstract

OPINION STATEMENT: Oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) incidence rates have been steadily increasing over the past several decades, and this has been largely attributed to human papillomavirus (HPV)-related OPSCC. The rise of HPV-related OPSCC and the observed distinct survival advantage it offers compared to HPV-unrelated OPSCC have resulted in the development of a new staging system specifically for OPSCC in the eighth edition of the AJCC Staging Manual for head and neck cancer. The observations on HPV-related OPSCC and its prognostic implications have coincided with increasing utilization of transoral surgical approaches to oropharyngeal tumors, such as transoral laser microsurgery (TLM) and transoral robotic surgery (TORS). These approaches were once thought to only be applicable to patients with low T-stage OPSCC tumors; however, they are being increasingly utilized in locally advanced OPSCC cases as several studies have shown that both of these transoral approaches are oncologically sound alternatives to concurrent chemoradiation therapy (CCRT), which was previously the standard-of-choice treatment in patients with locally advanced disease. Moreover, these transoral approaches have displayed better long-term swallowing outcomes compared to CCRT, as severe dysphagia is often the most bothersome functional impairment to OPSCC survivors who have undergone CCRT. While open surgical approaches were previously not utilized in the locally advanced OPSCC setting due to the risk of severe surgical complications compared to the potential benefits of organ preservation with CCRT and comparable survival rates after either treatment regimen, these approaches are still reasonable options for select patients in the salvage surgery setting, as they allow for maximum exposure to the deep oropharyngeal anatomy. Data from multiple clinical trials evaluating the potential for TORS to de-escalate radiation dose or CCRT regimen in certain settings will inform clinical decision-making for OPSCC patients for the next decade and allow for more personalized treatments tailored to an individual patient's disease burden.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Human papillomavirus-related cancer; Oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma; Transoral laser microsurgery; Transoral robotic surgery

Year:  2019        PMID: 30931485     DOI: 10.1007/s11864-019-0621-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol        ISSN: 1534-6277


  41 in total

1.  Randomized trial of radiation therapy versus concomitant chemotherapy and radiation therapy for advanced-stage oropharynx carcinoma.

Authors:  G Calais; M Alfonsi; E Bardet; C Sire; T Germain; P Bergerot; B Rhein; J Tortochaux; P Oudinot; P Bertrand
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1999-12-15       Impact factor: 13.506

2.  The use of CO2 laser in otolaryngology: a progress report.

Authors:  M S Strong; G J Jako; C W Vaughan; G B Healy; T Polanyi
Journal:  Trans Sect Otolaryngol Am Acad Ophthalmol Otolaryngol       Date:  1976 Sep-Oct

3.  Radiation therapy for squamous cell carcinoma of the tonsillar region: a preferred alternative to surgery?

Authors:  W M Mendenhall; R J Amdur; S P Stringer; D B Villaret; N J Cassisi
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Transoral robotic surgery: supraglottic laryngectomy in a canine model.

Authors:  Gregory S Weinstein; Bert W O'malley; Neil G Hockstein
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 3.325

5.  Swallowing function after chemoradiation for advanced stage oropharyngeal cancer.

Authors:  Samuel G Shiley; Christopher A Hargunani; Judith M Skoner; John M Holland; Mark K Wax
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 3.497

6.  Salvage surgery for patients with recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the upper aerodigestive tract: when do the ends justify the means?

Authors:  W J Goodwin
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 3.325

7.  Quality of life in patients with oropharynx carcinomas: assessment after accelerated radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy versus radical surgery and postoperative radiotherapy.

Authors:  Abdelkarim S Allal; Kevin Nicoucar; Nicolas Mach; Pavel Dulguerov
Journal:  Head Neck       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 3.147

8.  Incidence trends for human papillomavirus-related and -unrelated oral squamous cell carcinomas in the United States.

Authors:  Anil K Chaturvedi; Eric A Engels; William F Anderson; Maura L Gillison
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-02-01       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Squamous cell carcinoma of the oropharynx: surgery, radiation therapy, or both.

Authors:  James T Parsons; William M Mendenhall; Scott P Stringer; Robert J Amdur; Russell W Hinerman; Douglas B Villaret; Giselle J Moore-Higgs; Bruce D Greene; Tod W Speer; Nicholas J Cassisi; Rodney R Million
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2002-06-01       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  Transoral laser microsurgery for squamous cell carcinoma of the base of the tongue.

Authors:  Wolfgang Steiner; Oliver Fierek; Petra Ambrosch; Christian P Hommerich; Martina Kron
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2003-01
View more
  1 in total

1.  Predictors of survival in patients undergoing oropharyngeal surgery for cancer recurrence after radiation therapy.

Authors:  Molly E Heft Neal; Julia Brennan; Catherine T Haring; J Chad Brenner; Francis Worden; Paul Swiecicki; Michelle Mierzwa; Keith A Casper; Kelly M Malloy; Chaz L Stucken; Scott A McLean; Mark E Prince; Carol R Bradford; Gregory T Wolf; Andrew G Shuman; Steven B Chinn; Douglas B Chepeha; Andrew J Rosko; Matthew E Spector
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2020-03-19       Impact factor: 2.503

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.