PURPOSE: Recruitment of participants from diverse backgrounds is crucial to the generalizability of genetic research, but has proven challenging. We retrospectively evaluated recruitment methods used for a study on return of genetic results. METHODS: The costs of study design, development, and participant enrollment were calculated, and the characteristics of the participants enrolled through the seven recruitment methods were examined. RESULTS: A total of 1118 participants provided consent, a blood sample, and questionnaire data. The estimated cost across recruitment methods ranged from $579 to $1666 per participant and required a large recruitment team. Recruitment methods using flyers and staff networks were the most cost-efficient and resulted in the highest completion rate. Targeted sampling that emphasized the importance of Latino/a participation, utilization of translated materials, and in-person recruitments contributed to enrolling a demographically diverse sample. CONCLUSIONS: Although all methods were deployed in the same hospital or neighborhood and shared the same staff, each recruitment method was different in terms of cost and characteristics of the enrolled participants, suggesting the importance of carefully choosing the recruitment methods based on the desired composition of the final study sample. This analysis provides information about the effectiveness and cost of different methods to recruit adults for genetic research.
PURPOSE: Recruitment of participants from diverse backgrounds is crucial to the generalizability of genetic research, but has proven challenging. We retrospectively evaluated recruitment methods used for a study on return of genetic results. METHODS: The costs of study design, development, and participant enrollment were calculated, and the characteristics of the participants enrolled through the seven recruitment methods were examined. RESULTS: A total of 1118 participants provided consent, a blood sample, and questionnaire data. The estimated cost across recruitment methods ranged from $579 to $1666 per participant and required a large recruitment team. Recruitment methods using flyers and staff networks were the most cost-efficient and resulted in the highest completion rate. Targeted sampling that emphasized the importance of Latino/a participation, utilization of translated materials, and in-person recruitments contributed to enrolling a demographically diverse sample. CONCLUSIONS: Although all methods were deployed in the same hospital or neighborhood and shared the same staff, each recruitment method was different in terms of cost and characteristics of the enrolled participants, suggesting the importance of carefully choosing the recruitment methods based on the desired composition of the final study sample. This analysis provides information about the effectiveness and cost of different methods to recruit adults for genetic research.
Authors: Katrina J Lowstuter; Sharon Sand; Kathleen R Blazer; Deborah J MacDonald; Kimberly C Banks; Carol A Lee; Barbara U Schwerin; Margaret Juarez; Gwen C Uman; Jeffrey N Weitzel Journal: Genet Med Date: 2008-09 Impact factor: 8.822
Authors: Loabat Amiri; Andrea E Cassidy-Bushrow; Heather Dakki; Jia Li; Karen Wells; Susan A Oliveria; Marianne Ulcickas Yood; Abraham Thomas; David E Lanfear Journal: J Investig Med Date: 2014-01 Impact factor: 2.895
Authors: Harlyn G Skinner; Larissa Calancie; Maihan B Vu; Beverly Garcia; Molly DeMarco; Cam Patterson; Alice Ammerman; Jonathan C Schisler Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-05-04 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Katie L Lewis; Gillian W Hooker; Philip D Connors; Travis C Hyams; Martha F Wright; Samantha Caldwell; Leslie G Biesecker; Barbara B Biesecker Journal: Genet Med Date: 2015-11-05 Impact factor: 8.822
Authors: Vladislav Tsaltskan; Katherine Nguyen; Christina Eaglin; V Michael Holers; Kevin D Deane; Gary S Firestein Journal: ACR Open Rheumatol Date: 2022-05-10
Authors: Jordan G Nestor; Alexander Fedotov; David Fasel; Maddalena Marasa; Hila Milo-Rasouly; Julia Wynn; Wendy K Chung; Ali Gharavi; George Hripcsak; Suzanne Bakken; Soumitra Sengupta; Chunhua Weng Journal: JAMIA Open Date: 2021-03-01