OBJECTIVE: The preservation of acceptable facial nerve (FN) function after surgery is the key concern for most patients with vestibular schwannomas (VS). To assess predictive factors of early postoperative and long-term FN function in patients harboring large VS operated with a FN-sparing technique. METHODS: Single-center retrospective cohort study with 169 consecutive large VS operated on between January 2003 and May 2015. Clinical, radiologic, and intraoperative factors were assessed according to FN function. RESULTS: At last follow-up examination, among the 145 patients without preoperative FN palsy, FN function was good (House-Brackmann [HB] grades I or II) in 84% and moderate (HB grade III) in 15% of patients. Only 1 patient presented with poor HB grade IV function. Multivariate logistic regression model showed the mean preoperative VS extrameatal diameter as being an independent predictor of an unfavorable initial FN outcome (odds ratio [OR], 1.062; P = 0.038). Surgical anatomic preservation of the cochlear nerve was associated with better FN outcomes (OR, 0.237; P = 0.012). A history of previous surgery seemed to be related to long-term impaired FN function (OR, 71.405; P = 0.042), as well as early postoperative FN function (OR, 19.068; P = 0.000). No correlation was found between a history of previous Gamma Knife surgery treatment (P = 0.225) or the extent of resection (P = 0.438) and impaired FN outcomes. History of previous surgery was identified as an unfavorable predictive recovery factor of impaired postoperative FN function (P = 0.034). CONCLUSIONS: As long as the extent of resection or additional Gamma Knife surgery have not been identified as predictive risk factors of postoperative FN palsy, we suggest that optimal resection is the main option for patients harboring large VS.
OBJECTIVE: The preservation of acceptable facial nerve (FN) function after surgery is the key concern for most patients with vestibular schwannomas (VS). To assess predictive factors of early postoperative and long-term FN function in patients harboring large VS operated with a FN-sparing technique. METHODS: Single-center retrospective cohort study with 169 consecutive large VS operated on between January 2003 and May 2015. Clinical, radiologic, and intraoperative factors were assessed according to FN function. RESULTS: At last follow-up examination, among the 145 patients without preoperative FN palsy, FN function was good (House-Brackmann [HB] grades I or II) in 84% and moderate (HB grade III) in 15% of patients. Only 1 patient presented with poor HB grade IV function. Multivariate logistic regression model showed the mean preoperative VS extrameatal diameter as being an independent predictor of an unfavorable initial FN outcome (odds ratio [OR], 1.062; P = 0.038). Surgical anatomic preservation of the cochlear nerve was associated with better FN outcomes (OR, 0.237; P = 0.012). A history of previous surgery seemed to be related to long-term impaired FN function (OR, 71.405; P = 0.042), as well as early postoperative FN function (OR, 19.068; P = 0.000). No correlation was found between a history of previous Gamma Knife surgery treatment (P = 0.225) or the extent of resection (P = 0.438) and impaired FN outcomes. History of previous surgery was identified as an unfavorable predictive recovery factor of impaired postoperative FN function (P = 0.034). CONCLUSIONS: As long as the extent of resection or additional Gamma Knife surgery have not been identified as predictive risk factors of postoperative FN palsy, we suggest that optimal resection is the main option for patients harboring large VS.
Authors: Luciano Mastronardi; Alberto Campione; Guglielmo Cacciotti; Ettore Carpineta; Carlo Giacobbo Scavo; Raffaele Roperto; Giovanni Stati; Albert A Sufianov; Karl Schaller Journal: Neurosurg Rev Date: 2021-08-17 Impact factor: 3.042
Authors: Chloe Dumot; Stylianos Pikis; Georgios Mantziaris; Zhiyuan Xu; Rithika Kormath Anand; Ahmed M Nabeel; Darrah Sheehan; Kimball Sheehan; Wael A Reda; Sameh R Tawadros; Khaled Abdel Karim; Amr M N El-Shehaby; Reem M Emad Eldin; Selcuk Peker; Yavuz Samanci; Tehila Kaisman-Elbaz; Herwin Speckter; Wenceslao Hernández; Julio Isidor; Manjul Tripathi; Renu Madan; Brad E Zacharia; Lekhaj C Daggubati; Nuria Martínez Moreno; Roberto Martínez Álvarez; Anne-Marie Langlois; David Mathieu; Christopher P Deibert; Vivek R Sudhakar; Christopher P Cifarelli; Denisse Arteaga Icaza; Daniel T Cifarelli; Zhishuo Wei; Ajay Niranjan; Gene H Barnett; L Dade Lunsford; Greg N Bowden; Jason P Sheehan Journal: J Neurooncol Date: 2022-09-27 Impact factor: 4.506
Authors: Daniele Starnoni; Lorenzo Giammattei; Giulia Cossu; Michael J Link; Pierre-Hugues Roche; Ari G Chacko; Kenji Ohata; Majid Samii; Ashish Suri; Michael Bruneau; Jan F Cornelius; Luigi Cavallo; Torstein R Meling; Sebastien Froelich; Marcos Tatagiba; Albert Sufianov; Dimitrios Paraskevopoulos; Idoya Zazpe; Moncef Berhouma; Emmanuel Jouanneau; Jeroen B Verheul; Constantin Tuleasca; Mercy George; Marc Levivier; Mahmoud Messerer; Roy Thomas Daniel Journal: Acta Neurochir (Wien) Date: 2020-07-29 Impact factor: 2.216
Authors: Won Jae Lee; Jung Il Lee; Jung Won Choi; Doo Sik Kong; Do Hyun Nam; Yang Sun Cho; Hyung Jin Shin; Ho Jun Seol Journal: J Korean Med Sci Date: 2021-04-26 Impact factor: 2.153
Authors: Ineke M J Pruijn; Wietske Kievit; Mayke A Hentschel; Jef J S Mulder; Henricus P M Kunst Journal: Clin Otolaryngol Date: 2020-12-28 Impact factor: 2.597
Authors: Umberto Tosi; Miguel E Tusa Lavieri; Anjile An; Omri Maayan; Sergio W Guadix; Antonio P DeRosa; Paul J Christos; Susan Pannullo; Philip E Stieg; Andrew Brandmaier; Jonathan P S Knisely; Rohan Ramakrishna Journal: Neurooncol Pract Date: 2021-02-18