Literature DB >> 30929840

Current Management of pT3b Prostate Cancer After Robot-assisted Laparoscopic Prostatectomy.

Filip Poelaert1, Steven Joniau2, Thierry Roumeguère3, Filip Ameye4, Greet De Coster5, Peter Dekuyper4, Thierry Quackels3, Ben Van Cleynenbreugel2, Nancy Van Damme5, Elizabeth Van Eycken5, Alexander Mottrie6, Nicolaas Lumen7.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RALP) in high-risk and locally advanced prostate cancer (PCa) is gaining increasing traction. The optimal use of additional treatments for PCa with seminal vesicle invasion (pT3b) after RALP remains ill explored.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the management of pT3b PCa after RALP in current clinical practice. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: As part of the prospective Belgian RALP Consortium project (October 2009-March 2016), 796 patients with pT3b disease were evaluated. INTERVENTION: Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Population and perioperative characteristics were described to assess surgical outcome. Multivariable regression analyses were used to identify independent predictors of lymph node invasion (pN1), positive surgical margins (R+), postoperative morbidity, and additional treatments. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: In this prospective population-based registry, 85% of patients with clinical high-risk locally advanced PCa received pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND). Early postoperative complications (0-30 d) were observed in 68 patients (8.5%). During oncologic follow-up (median 12 mo), 63% of pN1 patients and 56% of R+ patients received additional therapy. Performing PLND (necessary for assessing pN1 status) was a specific predictor for androgen deprivation therapy only, whereas R+ and younger age were independent predictors for radiotherapy only. Limitations include the nonstandardized policy on additional treatments among hospitals.
CONCLUSIONS: In current practice, RALP is performed with acceptable morbidity for PCa with seminal vesicle invasion and the use of postoperative additional treatments is influenced by different patient, tumor, and surgical variables. Despite the recommendations, 15-21% of patients do not receive adequate pelvic lymph node staging and adjuvant therapy is given in 38% of patients. Full and correct staging of the real disease extent remains important in the management of these patients. PATIENT
SUMMARY: This study on prostate cancer with seminal vesicle invasion after robot-assisted prostatectomy evaluates the use of additional treatments in current clinical practice. Additional treatments for advanced prostate cancer should be patient-adjusted according to the disease extent.
Copyright © 2018 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Additional therapy; Prostate cancer; Radical prostatectomy; Robot-assisted surgery; Seminal vesicle invasion

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30929840     DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2018.05.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Urol Oncol        ISSN: 2588-9311


  3 in total

1.  Diagnostic Value, Oncologic Outcomes, and Safety Profile of Image-Guided Surgery Technologies During Robot-Assisted Lymph Node Dissection with Sentinel Node Biopsy for Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Elio Mazzone; Paolo Dell'Oglio; Nikos Grivas; Esther Wit; Maarten Donswijk; Alberto Briganti; Fijs Van Leeuwen; Henk van der Poel
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2021-02-05       Impact factor: 10.057

2.  Bilateral Seminal Vesicle Invasion Is Not Associated with Worse Outcomes in Locally Advanced Prostate Carcinoma.

Authors:  Natalia Vidal Crespo; Laura Enguita Arnal; Álvaro Gómez-Ferrer; Argimiro Collado Serra; Juan Manuel Mascarós; Ana Calatrava Fons; Juan Casanova Ramón-Borja; José Rubio Briones; Miguel Ramírez-Backhaus
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2022-08-05       Impact factor: 2.948

3.  Extended robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy and extended pelvic lymph node dissection as a monotherapy in patients with very high-risk prostate cancer Patients.

Authors:  Noriyoshi Miura; Naoya Sugihara; Keisuke Funaki; Toshio Kakuda; Kanae Koyama; Ryuta Watanabe; Yuichiro Sawada; Terutaka Noda; Kenichi Nishimura; Tetsuya Fukumoto; Yuki Miyauchi; Tadahiko Kikugawa; Takashi Saika
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2021-09-25       Impact factor: 4.452

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.