Literature DB >> 3092976

Randomised controlled trial of computer assisted management of hypertension in primary care.

N H McAlister, H D Covvey, C Tong, A Lee, E D Wigle.   

Abstract

The hypothesis that general practitioners would obtain better outcomes for patients with hypertension using a computer than doctors not using a computer was tested. Sixty family physicians were randomised to two treatment strategies. "Test" physicians completed a data collection form after each visit from a patient with hypertension and mailed the forms to the test centre for processing. Computer feedback on management was mailed to the doctors. This encouraged doctors to apply the "stepped care" protocol, supplied charts of diastolic blood pressure v time, and ranked patients' diastolic blood pressures by percentile. Letters were mailed to patients to remind them of appointments. "Control" doctors filled out the same data collection forms as test physicians, but neither doctors nor patients received computer feedback. Physicians who used the computer saw more patients per practice than control doctors (test 50 patients, control 40). For all patients the length of follow up was significantly longer in test practices (test 199 days, control 167), and a smaller percentage dropped out of active treatment in test practices (test 37.5%, control 42.1%). For patients with "moderate" hypertension of a baseline diastolic pressure of greater than 104 mm Hg the mean score of the last recorded pressure was below the goal of 90 mm Hg in test practices (88.5 mm Hg), but it failed to reach this goal in control practices (93.3 mm Hg). A greater average reduction of diastolic pressure was achieved in test practices (test 21.7 mm Hg, control 16.7 mm Hg). Though patients with "moderate" hypertension were better controlled in test practices than in control practices, the patients in test practices visited their doctors less often (test 13.3 visits per patient-year, control 17.4 visits). Among patients with newly detected hypertension test practices achieved a greater reduction in diastolic pressure than control practices (test 15.1 mm Hg v control 11.3 mm Hg) and more sustained control of hypertension (test 323 days per patient-year with a diastolic pressure of 90 mm Hg or less v control 259 days).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3092976      PMCID: PMC1341518          DOI: 10.1136/bmj.293.6548.670

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)        ISSN: 0267-0623


  24 in total

1.  Changing doctor prescribing behaviour.

Authors:  P S Gill; M Mäkelä; K M Vermeulen; N Freemantle; G Ryan; C Bond; T Thorsen; F M Haaijer-Ruskamp
Journal:  Pharm World Sci       Date:  1999-08

Review 2.  Interventions to improve the delivery of preventive services in primary care.

Authors:  M E Hulscher; M Wensing; R P Grol; T van der Weijden; C van Weel
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 3.  Considering clustering: a methodological review of clinical decision support system studies.

Authors:  J H Chuang; G Hripcsak; R A Jenders
Journal:  Proc AMIA Symp       Date:  2000

4.  Design and analysis of controlled trials in naturally clustered environments: implications for medical informatics.

Authors:  Jen-Hsiang Chuang; George Hripcsak; Daniel F Heitjan
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2002 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.497

5.  A critical appraisal of the literature on the effects of computer-based clinical decision support systems on clinician performance and patient outcomes.

Authors:  K B Langton; M E Johnston; R B Haynes; A Mathieu
Journal:  Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care       Date:  1992

Review 6.  Developing and implementing clinical practice guidelines.

Authors:  J Grimshaw; N Freemantle; S Wallace; I Russell; B Hurwitz; I Watt; A Long; T Sheldon
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  1995-03

Review 7.  Achieving health gain through clinical guidelines II: Ensuring guidelines change medical practice.

Authors:  J M Grimshaw; I T Russell
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  1994-03

Review 8.  Implementing guidelines in general practice care.

Authors:  R Grol
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  1992-09

Review 9.  Implementing guidelines and innovations in general practice: which interventions are effective?

Authors:  M Wensing; T van der Weijden; R Grol
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 10.  Features predicting the success of computerized decision support for prescribing: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Brent Mollon; Jaron Chong; Anne M Holbrook; Melani Sung; Lehana Thabane; Gary Foster
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2009-02-11       Impact factor: 2.796

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.