Fengxiang Xie1, Zaibo Li2, Liran Zhang1, Huina Zhang3, Debo Qi1, Dongman Zhao1, Xin Zhang1, Xinguo Wang1, Chengquan Zhao4. 1. Jinan KingMed Diagnostics, Jinan, Shandong, China. 2. Department of Pathology, Wexner Medical Center at Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA. 3. Department of Pathology, Magee-Womens Hospital, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA. 4. Department of Pathology, Magee-Womens Hospital, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA. Electronic address: zhaoc@upmc.edu.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: There is no national cervical screening program or national standards for cervical cytology quality control in China. Since 2013, systematic training and quality control programs were implemented in the Papanicolaou testing process at Jinan KingMed Diagnostics. Pathologists were required to complete 1 year of cytology study in the KingMed Diagnostics Cytology School, including 6 months of a diagnostic course and 6 months of practical training in the clinical laboratory. In this study, we compared the Papanicolaou abnormal reporting rates before and after the implementation systematic training and quality control programs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Systematic cytology training and quality control (QC) programs were implemented in 2013. Results from 997,162 cases of liquid-based cytology (LBC) and 100,066 cases of conventional Papanicolaou smears (CPS) rendered between 2008 and 2015 at Jinan KingMed Diagnostics were collected and analyzed. RESULTS: After implementation of training and programs, the abnormal reporting rates of atypical squamous cells of unknown significance (ASC-US), low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (LSIL), atypical squamous cells cannot exclude HSIL (ASC-H), atypical glandular cells (AGC), and high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSIL) in LBC were significantly increased. Similar trends were also observed in CPS reporting, except for ASC-H, squamous cell carcinoma, and AGC, probably due to the small percentages of these categories. CONCLUSIONS: The study demonstrates the importance of the formal cytology training and QC programs to ensure standardized and effective cervical cancer screening in undeveloped countries, which account for the largest percentage of the world's annual incidence of cervical cancer and with a largely unscreened population.
INTRODUCTION: There is no national cervical screening program or national standards for cervical cytology quality control in China. Since 2013, systematic training and quality control programs were implemented in the Papanicolaou testing process at Jinan KingMed Diagnostics. Pathologists were required to complete 1 year of cytology study in the KingMed Diagnostics Cytology School, including 6 months of a diagnostic course and 6 months of practical training in the clinical laboratory. In this study, we compared the Papanicolaou abnormal reporting rates before and after the implementation systematic training and quality control programs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Systematic cytology training and quality control (QC) programs were implemented in 2013. Results from 997,162 cases of liquid-based cytology (LBC) and 100,066 cases of conventional Papanicolaou smears (CPS) rendered between 2008 and 2015 at Jinan KingMed Diagnostics were collected and analyzed. RESULTS: After implementation of training and programs, the abnormal reporting rates of atypical squamous cells of unknown significance (ASC-US), low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (LSIL), atypical squamous cells cannot exclude HSIL (ASC-H), atypical glandular cells (AGC), and high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSIL) in LBC were significantly increased. Similar trends were also observed in CPS reporting, except for ASC-H, squamous cell carcinoma, and AGC, probably due to the small percentages of these categories. CONCLUSIONS: The study demonstrates the importance of the formal cytology training and QC programs to ensure standardized and effective cervical cancer screening in undeveloped countries, which account for the largest percentage of the world's annual incidence of cervical cancer and with a largely unscreened population.