Ben Windsor-Shellard1, David Gunnell2. 1. Head of Lifestyle and Risk Factors Analysis,Health Analysis and Life Events,Office for National Statistics,UK. 2. Professor of Epidemiology,Population Health Sciences,Bristol Medical School,University of Bristol; andNational Institute of Health Research Biomedical Research Centre at the University Hospitals Bristol National Health Service Foundation Trust and the University of Bristol,UK.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Previous research has documented marked occupational differences in suicide risk, but these estimates are 10 years old and based on potentially biased risk assessments.AimsTo investigate occupation-specific suicide mortality in England, 2011-2015. METHOD: Estimation of indirectly standardised mortality rates for occupations/occupational groups based on national data. RESULTS: Among males the highest risks were seen in low-skilled occupations, particularly construction workers (standardised mortality ratio [SMR] 369, 95% CI 333-409); low-skilled workers comprised 17% (1784/10 688) of all male suicides (SMR 144, 95% CI 137-151). High risks were also seen among skilled trade occupations (SMR 135 95% CI 130-139; 29% of male suicides). There was no evidence of increased risk among some occupations previously causing concern: male healthcare professionals and farmers. Among females the highest risks were seen in artists (SMR 399, 95% CI 244-616) and bar staff (SMR 182, 95% CI 123-260); nurses also had an increased risk (SMR 123, 95% CI 104-145). People in creative occupations and the entertainment industry - artists (both genders), musicians (males) and actors (males) - were at increased risk, although the absolute numbers of deaths in these occupations were low. In males (SMR 192, 95% CI 165-221) and females (SMR 170, 95% CI 149-194), care workers were at increased risk and had a considerable number of suicide deaths. CONCLUSIONS: Specific contributors to suicide in high-risk occupations should be identified and measures - such as workplace-based interventions - put in place to mitigate this risk. The construction industry seems to be an important target for preventive interventions.Declaration of interestNone.
BACKGROUND: Previous research has documented marked occupational differences in suicide risk, but these estimates are 10 years old and based on potentially biased risk assessments.AimsTo investigate occupation-specific suicide mortality in England, 2011-2015. METHOD: Estimation of indirectly standardised mortality rates for occupations/occupational groups based on national data. RESULTS: Among males the highest risks were seen in low-skilled occupations, particularly construction workers (standardised mortality ratio [SMR] 369, 95% CI 333-409); low-skilled workers comprised 17% (1784/10 688) of all male suicides (SMR 144, 95% CI 137-151). High risks were also seen among skilled trade occupations (SMR 135 95% CI 130-139; 29% of male suicides). There was no evidence of increased risk among some occupations previously causing concern: male healthcare professionals and farmers. Among females the highest risks were seen in artists (SMR 399, 95% CI 244-616) and bar staff (SMR 182, 95% CI 123-260); nurses also had an increased risk (SMR 123, 95% CI 104-145). People in creative occupations and the entertainment industry - artists (both genders), musicians (males) and actors (males) - were at increased risk, although the absolute numbers of deaths in these occupations were low. In males (SMR 192, 95% CI 165-221) and females (SMR 170, 95% CI 149-194), care workers were at increased risk and had a considerable number of suicide deaths. CONCLUSIONS: Specific contributors to suicide in high-risk occupations should be identified and measures - such as workplace-based interventions - put in place to mitigate this risk. The construction industry seems to be an important target for preventive interventions.Declaration of interestNone.
Authors: Ha Ngoc Do; Anh Tuan Nguyen; Hoa Quynh Thi Nguyen; Thanh Phuong Bui; Quy Van Nguyen; Ngan Thu Thi Tran; Long Hoang Nguyen; Hai Quang Pham; Giang Hai Ha; Chi Linh Hoang; Bach Xuan Tran; Carl A Latkin; Roger C M Ho; Cyrus S H Ho Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-04-23 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Alexander Christopher Ryan Burnett; Q Wong; D Rheinberger; S Zeritis; L McGillivray; M H Torok Journal: Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol Date: 2022-01-13 Impact factor: 4.519
Authors: Victoria Ross; Neil Caton; Sharna Mathieu; Jorgen Gullestrup; Kairi Kõlves Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-09-03 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Corinne Peek-Asa; Ling Zhang; Cara Hamann; Jonathan Davis; Laura Schwab-Reese Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-09-10 Impact factor: 3.390