Literature DB >> 30928556

Reconstruction of Long Noncircumferential Tracheal or Carinal Resections With Bronchial Flaps.

Qiao Peng1, Lei Zhang1, Yijiu Ren1, Wenxin He1, Dong Xie1, Gening Jiang1, Yuming Zhu1, Hui Zheng1, Chang Chen2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Removal of tumors that invade the trachea or carina often results in a massive defect that exceeds the limits of end-to-end anastomosis. The purpose of this study is to discuss the clinical value of bronchial flap for the closure of central airway defects after noncircumferential tracheal or carinal resection.
METHODS: From 1990 to 2016, 73 patients underwent noncircumferential tracheal or carinal resection. From size, location, and pulmonary function, there were six different types of bronchial flap reconstruction.
RESULTS: We performed bronchial flap upturned reconstruction with right pneumonectomy (n = 45), right upper lobectomy (n = 9), left pneumonectomy (n = 7), left upper lobectomy (n = 3), and bronchial flap downturned reconstruction with right pneumonectomy (n = 5), left pneumonectomy (n = 4). The size of airway defects that were replaced by bronchial flap ranged from 0.5 × 2 to 2.5 × 7 cm and was at most 50% of the airway circumference. Postoperative major complications occurred in 17.8% (13 of 73) of patients: four bronchopleural fistulas (5.5%), five serious postoperative infections (6.8%), two pulmonary atelectasis (2.7%), and two airway stenosis (2.7%). However, no significant differences were found in postoperative complications between resection lengths shorter than 4 cm and longer than 4 cm (p = 0.295). The overall 30-day mortality rate was 2.7%. The overall survival rate was 63.5% and 23.6% at 2 and 5 years, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: The six different types of bronchial flap reconstruction present an efficient therapeutic strategy to close massive central airway defects after noncircumferential tracheal or carinal resection when the patient has poor pulmonary function or when an end-to-end anastomosis is unfeasible and risky.
Copyright © 2019 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30928556     DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2019.02.057

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg        ISSN: 0003-4975            Impact factor:   4.330


  7 in total

1.  Feasibility and safety of pedicled autologous bronchial flap reconstruction airway instead of sleeve lobectomy in partial lung cancer surgery.

Authors:  Zheng Zhang; Xiaonu Peng; Bo Ai; Kuo Li; Yang Li; Fernando C Abrão; Hitoshi Igai; Ricardo Mingarini Terra; Han Xiao; Quanfu Huang; Yongde Liao
Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res       Date:  2022-06

2.  Editorial on: are we achieving ultimative limits of the minimally invasive thoracic surgery?

Authors:  Paolo N C Girotti
Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res       Date:  2021-11

3.  Thoracolaparoscopic carinal resection and reconstruction using pedicle omental flap.

Authors:  Takeo Nakada; Takashi Ohtsuka
Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res       Date:  2021-09

4.  Surgical perception of lower tracheal or carinal resection.

Authors:  Yusuke Sugita; Hiroaki Kuroda; Katsuhiro Masago
Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res       Date:  2021-11

5.  Pushing the boundaries of minimally invasive surgery.

Authors:  Fabrizio Minervini; Sven Oliver Schumann; Gregor J Kocher
Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res       Date:  2021-11

6.  The current state of carinal resection and role of minimally invasive techniques.

Authors:  Andrei I Gritsiuta; Charles T Bakhos; Roman V Petrov
Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res       Date:  2021-10

7.  Minimally invasive carinal reconstruction-is less really more?

Authors:  Anna Elisabeth Frick; Konrad Hoetzenecker
Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res       Date:  2021-11
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.