Islam Abd Alraheam1, Terry E Donovan2, Brandon Rodgers3, Lee Boushell4, Taiseer A Sulaiman5. 1. Adjunct Faculty, Division of Operative Dentistry and Biomaterials, Department of Restorative Sciences, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC; Assistant Professor, Department of Conservative Dentistry, University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan. 2. Professor, Division of Operative Dentistry and Biomaterials, Department of Restorative Sciences, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC. 3. Research Assistant, Division of Operative Dentistry and Biomaterials, Department of Restorative Sciences, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC. 4. Associate Professor, Division of Operative Dentistry and Biomaterials, Department of Restorative Sciences, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC. 5. Assistant Professor and Division Director, Division of Operative Dentistry and Biomaterials, Department of Restorative Sciences, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC. Electronic address: sulaiman@unc.edu.
Abstract
STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Translucent zirconia has been marketed to dentists seeking to provide esthetic monolithic dental restorations. Evidence on differences in translucency between recently introduced translucent zirconia and conventional zirconia before and after fatigue testing with thermocycling is lacking. PURPOSE: The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate the effect of fatiguing and thermocycling on the translucency of 5 mol% yttria partially stabilized zirconia (5Y-PSZ) and 3 mol% yttria partially stabilized zirconia (3Y-PSZ) at clinically relevant thicknesses. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Translucent zirconia (BruxZir Anterior Solid Zirconia [5Y-PSZ]) and conventional zirconia (BruxZir Shaded Zirconia [3Y-PSZ]) were evaluated. Disk-shaped specimens were prepared to 0.7-mm and 1.2-mm thicknesses for each zirconia type. Four groups (n=10/group) were evaluated. Translucency parameter (TP), contrast ratio (CR), and light blockage percentage (Lb%) were recorded by using an integrating sphere spectrophotometer before and after fatiguing (1.2 million cycles at 110-N load with simultaneous thermocycling at 5 °C to 55 °C). Data were analyzed by repeated-measures analysis of variance for statistical significance (α=.05). CR values were compared with the reported 0.06 translucency perception threshold of the human eye. RESULTS: A statistically significant difference was found in TP, CR, and Lb% between 5Y-PSZ and 3Y-PSZ (P<.001). Thickness had a statistically significant effect on TP, CR, and Lb% (P<.05). The 0.7-mm thickness groups were more translucent and had lower Lb% than the 1.2-mm thickness groups (P<.001). Baseline ranking from most to least translucent according to TP and CR measurements was as follows: 5Y-PSZ (0.7 mm), 3Y-PSZ (0.7 mm), 5Y-PSZ (1.2 mm), and 3Y-PSZ (1.2 mm). Lb% was 64% at the 1.2-mm and 56% at the 0.7-mm thickness in the 3Y-PSZ groups. Lb% was 61% at the 1.2-mm and 53% at the 0.7-mm thickness in the 5Y-PSZ groups. None of the groups, before and after fatiguing, had a CR value exceeding the clinically perceivable 0.06 translucency perception threshold value. CONCLUSIONS: Translucent (5Y-PSZ) and conventional (3Y-PSZ) zirconias evaluated in this study displayed degrees of translucency that were inversely related to the zirconia thickness. 5Y-PSZ was more translucent and blocked less light than 3Y-PSZ, but this difference may not be perceivable to the human eye. Both 5Y-PSZ and 3Y-PSZ were optically stable after fatiguing and thermocycling.
STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Translucent zirconia has been marketed to dentists seeking to provide esthetic monolithic dental restorations. Evidence on differences in translucency between recently introduced translucent zirconia and conventional zirconia before and after fatigue testing with thermocycling is lacking. PURPOSE: The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate the effect of fatiguing and thermocycling on the translucency of 5 mol% yttria partially stabilized zirconia (5Y-PSZ) and 3 mol% yttria partially stabilized zirconia (3Y-PSZ) at clinically relevant thicknesses. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Translucent zirconia (BruxZir Anterior Solid Zirconia [5Y-PSZ]) and conventional zirconia (BruxZir Shaded Zirconia [3Y-PSZ]) were evaluated. Disk-shaped specimens were prepared to 0.7-mm and 1.2-mm thicknesses for each zirconia type. Four groups (n=10/group) were evaluated. Translucency parameter (TP), contrast ratio (CR), and light blockage percentage (Lb%) were recorded by using an integrating sphere spectrophotometer before and after fatiguing (1.2 million cycles at 110-N load with simultaneous thermocycling at 5 °C to 55 °C). Data were analyzed by repeated-measures analysis of variance for statistical significance (α=.05). CR values were compared with the reported 0.06 translucency perception threshold of the human eye. RESULTS: A statistically significant difference was found in TP, CR, and Lb% between 5Y-PSZ and 3Y-PSZ (P<.001). Thickness had a statistically significant effect on TP, CR, and Lb% (P<.05). The 0.7-mm thickness groups were more translucent and had lower Lb% than the 1.2-mm thickness groups (P<.001). Baseline ranking from most to least translucent according to TP and CR measurements was as follows: 5Y-PSZ (0.7 mm), 3Y-PSZ (0.7 mm), 5Y-PSZ (1.2 mm), and 3Y-PSZ (1.2 mm). Lb% was 64% at the 1.2-mm and 56% at the 0.7-mm thickness in the 3Y-PSZ groups. Lb% was 61% at the 1.2-mm and 53% at the 0.7-mm thickness in the 5Y-PSZ groups. None of the groups, before and after fatiguing, had a CR value exceeding the clinically perceivable 0.06 translucency perception threshold value. CONCLUSIONS: Translucent (5Y-PSZ) and conventional (3Y-PSZ) zirconias evaluated in this study displayed degrees of translucency that were inversely related to the zirconia thickness. 5Y-PSZ was more translucent and blocked less light than 3Y-PSZ, but this difference may not be perceivable to the human eye. Both 5Y-PSZ and 3Y-PSZ were optically stable after fatiguing and thermocycling.