Simon F Roy1, Danni Dong2, Peggy Myung2, Jennifer M McNiff2. 1. Department of Pathology, University of Montréal, Montréal, Quebec, Canada. 2. Department of Dermatology, Yale University Medical School, New Haven, Connecticut.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Multinucleate cell angiohistiocytoma (MCAH) is an uncommon and likely underdiagnosed entity that is thought to be of vascular and fibrohistiocytic origin. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed all cases diagnosed as MCAH at the Yale Medicine Dermatopathology laboratory between 1 January 1990 and 1 September 2018. Sixty-two cases were retained. We performed immunohistochemistry on the ten most inflamed lesions found and assessed for a possible alteration within the Wnt/ß-catenin signaling pathway, involved in follicular induction in dermatofibroma. We subsequently established histologic diagnostic criteria to differentiate MCAH from its mimickers. RESULTS: MCAH affected both genders equally. The hands or fingers were affected in 51.6% of cases. We found the most specific histologic criteria to be: (a) presence of odd multinucleated fibroblasts, (b) presence of superficial parallel fibrosis, (c) presence and thickening of superficial papillary dermal vessels, and (d) absence of perifollicular fibrosis. As for immunoreactivity, we found positivity to CD138, CD163, and CD117 in the mononuclear inflammatory infiltrate. There was no histopathologic evidence of follicular induction, as can be seen in dermatofibromas, and no expression of nuclear beta-catenin as seen in dermatofibromas with follicular induction. CONCLUSION: This large case series establishes MCAH as a distinct clinical and histopathologic entity.
BACKGROUND: Multinucleate cell angiohistiocytoma (MCAH) is an uncommon and likely underdiagnosed entity that is thought to be of vascular and fibrohistiocytic origin. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed all cases diagnosed as MCAH at the Yale Medicine Dermatopathology laboratory between 1 January 1990 and 1 September 2018. Sixty-two cases were retained. We performed immunohistochemistry on the ten most inflamed lesions found and assessed for a possible alteration within the Wnt/ß-catenin signaling pathway, involved in follicular induction in dermatofibroma. We subsequently established histologic diagnostic criteria to differentiate MCAH from its mimickers. RESULTS: MCAH affected both genders equally. The hands or fingers were affected in 51.6% of cases. We found the most specific histologic criteria to be: (a) presence of odd multinucleated fibroblasts, (b) presence of superficial parallel fibrosis, (c) presence and thickening of superficial papillary dermal vessels, and (d) absence of perifollicular fibrosis. As for immunoreactivity, we found positivity to CD138, CD163, and CD117 in the mononuclear inflammatory infiltrate. There was no histopathologic evidence of follicular induction, as can be seen in dermatofibromas, and no expression of nuclear beta-catenin as seen in dermatofibromas with follicular induction. CONCLUSION: This large case series establishes MCAH as a distinct clinical and histopathologic entity.