| Literature DB >> 30927245 |
Paweł Paśko1, Ewelina Prochownik2, Mirosław Krośniak2, Małgorzata Tyszka-Czochara2, Renata Francik3, Monika Marcinkowska4, Jakub Sikora5, Mateusz Malinowski5, Paweł Zagrodzki2.
Abstract
The study was primarily aimed at investigating the effect of brassica sprout consumption, namely rutabaga (Brassica napus L. var. napobrassica) sprouts (R) generally recognized as antithyroid agent due to its goitrogenic substance content, on hematological, biochemical, and immunological parameters in rats. Sprouts were tested alone and in a combination with other antithyroid factors, such as iodine deficiency (RDI) and sulfadimethoxine (RS). The expression of the heme oxygenase-1 (HO-1) gene in the thyroid as a stress-inducible protein was determined. The thermographic analysis was also estimated. The intake of rutabaga sprouts by healthy rats did not reveal any significant, harmful effect on the thyroid function. Both body temperature and expression of HO-1 remained unchanged in response to the consumed sprouts. In animals with hypothyroidism, rutabaga sprouts enhanced the negative effect of iodine deficiency or sulfadimethoxine ingestion on the organism by increasing the WBC (RDI), TNF-α (RS), creatinine (RS), and triglyceride (RDI and RS) levels, as well as decreasing PLT (RS) level. Moreover, rutabaga sprout consumption by rats with iodine deficiency and sulfadimethoxine decreased their body temperature. Additionally, the concomitant administration of sprouts and iodine depletion significantly reduced the expression of HO-1 in the thyroid. The results may prove useful in confirming rutabaga sprout consumption to be safe, though the seeds of this vegetable provide a well-known antithyroid agent. Our results have shown that rutabaga sprout consumption may be also a factor that enhances the negative clinical features only when combined with iodine deficiency and sulfadimethoxine ingestion.Entities:
Keywords: Brassica sprouts; Immunology; Iodine deficiency; Rutabaga; Thyroid gland
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30927245 PMCID: PMC6914734 DOI: 10.1007/s12011-019-01694-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biol Trace Elem Res ISSN: 0163-4984 Impact factor: 3.738
Mean values and standard deviations for parameters characterizing blood morphology, biochemical and immunological features and body temperature in all animal groups under investigation
| Parameters | C | R | DI | RDI | S | RS | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blood morphology parameters | |||||||
| RBC (106/μL) | 9.6 ± 0.4 | 9.4 ± 0.2 | 9.2 ± 0.4 | 9.6 ± 0.3 | 9.5 ± 0.4 | 9.3 ± 0.2 | |
| Hb (g/dL) | 14.4 ± 0.5 | 14.0 ± 0.4 | 14.0 ± 0.5 | 14.4 ± 0.5 | 14.3 ± 0.6 | 14.7 ± 0.3 | |
| Hct (%) | 48.5 ± 3.2 | 46.4 ± 1.4 | 47.4 ± 2.5 | 49.5 ± 1.9 | 48.5 ± 2.0 | 50.3 ± 1.4 | |
| MCV (fL) | 50.5 ± 1.5 | 49.5 ± 0.9 | 51.2 ± 0.8 | 51.6 ± 0.7 | 50.8 ± 0.3 | 54.2 ± 1.0 | |
| MCH (pg/cell) | 15.0 ± 0.2 | 14.9 ± 0.3 | 15.1 ± 0.2 | 15.1 ± 0.1 | 15.0 ± 0.2 | 15.8 ± 0.3 | |
| MCHC (g/dL) | 29.8 ± 1.1 | 30.1 ± 0.7 | 29.5 ± 0.8 | 29.2 ± 0.6 | 29.5 ± 0.4 | 29.2 ± 0.6 | |
| WBC (103/μL) | 8.3 ± 1.2a | 7.2 ± 0.8b | 8.0 ± 1.1c | 10.5 ± 1.1abcde | 7.5 ± 1.2d | 7.0 ± 0.9e | abcde*** |
| PLT (103/μL) | 563.9 ± 41.8a | 605.2 ± 43.6b | 591.0 ± 65.8c | 603.6 ± 94.2d | 605.3 ± 28.5e | 468.9 ± 126.7abcde | a*bde***c** |
| Biochemical parameters | |||||||
| Glucose (mmoL/L) | 15.13 ± 4.05 | 15.99 ± 3.40 | 15.10 ± 2.60 | 13.30 ± 1.10 | 13.60 ± 0.61 | 14.9 ± 2.60 | |
| LDH (U/L) | 221.5 ± 140.9 | 239.4 ± 126.4 | 206.5 ± 105.9 | 149.5 ± 41.17 | 104.2 ± 40.49 | 168.5 ± 61.27 | |
| Urea (mmoL/L) | 4.84 ± 0.23 | 4.97 ± 0.16 | 4.70 ± 0.11 | 4.83 ± 0.30 | 4.78 ± 0.21 | 4.77 ± 0.24 | |
| Creatinine (μmol/L) | 63.9 ± 6.5a | 61.3 ± 8.7b | 71.1 ± 20.5c | 67.2 ± 13.4d | 58.7 ± 4.8e | 81.3 ± 28.3abcde | abe***c*d** |
| ASPAT (U/L) | 101.3 ± 15.2abcd | 85.0 ± 12.5ef | 69.2 ± 20.1a | 61.3 ± 14.7be | 72.2 ± 6.7cg | 52.1 ± 9.5dfg | abcdf***eg* |
| ALAT (U/L) | 73.3 ± 10.5abcde | 48.9 ± 5.9afgh | 39.9 ± 7.2bfi | 41.2 ± 5.9cj | 59.9 ± 6.4dgijk | 39.1 ± 6.8ehk | abcdeijk***fgh* |
| TG (mmoL/L) | 0.24 ± 0.08abc | 0.25 ± 0.08def | 0.74 ± 0.30adgh | 0.75 ± 0.32beij | 0.42 ± 0.21gik | 1.08 ± 0.29cfhjk | abcdefk***ghij* |
| TC (mmoL/L) | 1.74 ± 1.03 | 1.84 ± 0.90 | 2.30 ± 0.60 | 1.90 ± 0.50 | 1.60 ± 0.31 | 2.01 ± 0.14 | |
| HDL (mmoL/L) | 0.78 ± 0.11ab | 0.81 ± 0.10cd | 0.96 ± 0.20 | 1.00 ± 0.17ac | 0.94 ± 0.12 | 1.08 ± 0.21bd | ad**b***c* |
| PAL (U/L) | 365.9 ± 38.6 | 345.9 ± 103.4 | 316.2 ± 63.5 | 278.0 ± 56.3 | 369.3 ± 37.3 | 286.7 ± 26.7 | |
| Immunological parameters | |||||||
| TNF-alfa (pg/mL) | 39.2 ± 28.0a | 18.6 ± 2.9b | 26.4 ± 6.3c | 33.6 ± 9.9d | 38.9 ± 7.5e | 65.8 ± 18.7abcde | acde*b*** |
| IL-6 (pg/mL) | 63.4 ± 36.1 | 46.8 ± 26.7 | 50.2 ± 23.0 | 48.0 ± 36.0 | 45.0 ± 12.0 | 31.0 ± 11.6 | |
| IL-10 (pg/mL) | 2.3 ± 0.5 | 18.5 ± 11.4 | 2.1 ± 0.2 | 23.2 ± 19.4 | 20.2 ± 13.9 | 40.8 ± 30.3 | |
| Body temperature | |||||||
| TEMP (°C) | 37.92 ± 0.78abc | 37.25 ± 1.70 | 37.88 ± 0.64 | 36.16 ± 1.22c | 36.69 ± 0.57ad | 34.91 ± 0.75bd | a* b, c, d*** |
Mean values with the same superscripts are significantly different between the indicated group at *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001
Correlation weights for the pairs of correlated parameters (based on PLS model; only correlation weights with absolute values higher than 0.150 are shown)
| Pairs of correlated parameters | Correlation weight | |
|---|---|---|
| Urea | Hb | 0.206 |
| TG | Creatinine | 0.203 |
| PAL | Urea | 0.189 |
| TG | MCV | 0.187 |
| Urea | RBC | 0.178 |
| TG | MCH | 0.165 |
| HDL | Creatinine | 0.164 |
| TG | HDL | 0.161 |
| Urea | HCT | 0.161 |
| Creatinine | MCV | 0.153 |
| Glucose | PAL | − 0.168 |
| Glucose | RBC | − 0.169 |
| Glucose | Hb | − 0.195 |
| ASPAT | TG | − 0.225 |
| Glucose | Urea | − 0.286 |
Fig. 1Parameter loadings on the first two latent components in PLS model (dots denote predictor parameters; triangles denote response parameters)
Fig. 2The distribution of the studied samples (individual animals) in the space determined by the first two latent components in PLS model
Fig. 3Dendrogram of similarity in immunological parameters in serum among the investigated individuals (method of grouping: average linkage procedure, function of the distance: Euclidean distance; rectangles encompass the individuals belonging to the distinguished clusters A + B and C, respectively; for details see “Discussion”)
Fig. 4Effect of rutabaga sprouts, deficiency of iodine, and sulfadimethoxine ingestion alone or in combination with other factors on HO-1 expression in the thyroid gland (n = 4). Mean values with the same superscript are significantly different between the indicated group at *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01