D A Neher1, A J Cutler1, T R Weicht1, M Sharma2, P D Millner2. 1. Department of Plant and Soil Science, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, USA. 2. Environmental Microbial and Food Safety Laboratory, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agriculture Research Service, Beltsville, MD, USA.
Abstract
AIMS: The aim was to determine the survival and persistence of Escherichia coli in soil amended with compost from different manure sources. METHOD AND RESULTS: Complex interactions of abiotic and biotic factors on E. coli survival were characterized in field experiment plots receiving randomly assigned compost treatments: dairy windrow, dairy vermicompost, poultry windrow or no compost. Biomass, activity and function of indigenous microbial communities in the composts and soils were measured concurrently to determine whether mechanisms of compost were driven by biotic or abiotic properties. E. coli persisted in compost containing poultry amendments but not in composts containing dairy or no amendments. Poultry compost contained more NH4 -N and a distinct microbial community compared to dairy and no compost treatments. A laboratory experiment performed on compost extracts suggested that E. coli survived better in extracts devoid of indigenous microbes as long as bioavailable nutrients were plentiful. CONCLUSIONS: Dairy-based composts are less likely to support E. coli survival than poultry-based composts. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: Results aid in risk assessment of the use of different types of manure-based compost and soil amendments in fruit and vegetable production by elucidating the roles of nutrient and microbial community composition on survival of E. coli in amended field soils.
AIMS: The aim was to determine the survival and persistence of Escherichia coli in soil amended with compost from different manure sources. METHOD AND RESULTS: Complex interactions of abiotic and biotic factors on E. coli survival were characterized in field experiment plots receiving randomly assigned compost treatments: dairy windrow, dairy vermicompost, poultry windrow or no compost. Biomass, activity and function of indigenous microbial communities in the composts and soils were measured concurrently to determine whether mechanisms of compost were driven by biotic or abiotic properties. E. coli persisted in compost containing poultry amendments but not in composts containing dairy or no amendments. Poultry compost contained more NH4 -N and a distinct microbial community compared to dairy and no compost treatments. A laboratory experiment performed on compost extracts suggested that E. coli survived better in extracts devoid of indigenous microbes as long as bioavailable nutrients were plentiful. CONCLUSIONS: Dairy-based composts are less likely to support E. coli survival than poultry-based composts. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: Results aid in risk assessment of the use of different types of manure-based compost and soil amendments in fruit and vegetable production by elucidating the roles of nutrient and microbial community composition on survival of E. coli in amended field soils.