Literature DB >> 30924876

Is NPP proportional to GPP? Waring's hypothesis 20 years on.

A Collalti1,2, I C Prentice3,4,5.   

Abstract

Gross primary production (GPP) is partitioned to autotrophic respiration (Ra) and net primary production (NPP), the latter being used to build plant tissues and synthesize non-structural and secondary compounds. Waring et al. (1998; Net primary production of forests: a constant fraction of gross primary production? Tree Physiol 18:129-134) suggested that a NPP:GPP ratio of 0.47 ± 0.04 (SD) is universal across biomes, tree species and stand ages. Representing NPP in models as a fixed fraction of GPP, they argued, would be both simpler and more accurate than trying to simulate Ra mechanistically. This paper reviews progress in understanding the NPP:GPP ratio in forests during the 20 years since the Waring et al. paper. Research has confirmed the existence of pervasive acclimation mechanisms that tend to stabilize the NPP:GPP ratio and indicates that Ra should not be modelled independently of GPP. Nonetheless, studies indicate that the value of this ratio is influenced by environmental factors, stand age and management. The average NPP:GPP ratio in over 200 studies, representing different biomes, species and forest stand ages, was found to be 0.46, consistent with the central value that Waring et al. proposed but with a much larger standard deviation (±0.12) and a total range (0.22-0.79) that is too large to be disregarded.
© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  autotrophic respiration; carbon-use efficiency; forest ecosystem; modelling; primary production

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30924876     DOI: 10.1093/treephys/tpz034

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tree Physiol        ISSN: 0829-318X            Impact factor:   4.196


  5 in total

1.  Non-linear responses of net ecosystem productivity to gradient warming in a paddy field in Northeast China.

Authors:  Yulu Sun; Fuyao Qu; Xianjin Zhu; Bei Sun; Guojiao Wang; Hong Yin; Tao Wan; Xiaowen Song; Qian Chen
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2020-06-10       Impact factor: 2.984

Review 2.  Forest carbon allocation modelling under climate change.

Authors:  Katarína Merganičová; Ján Merganič; Aleksi Lehtonen; Giorgio Vacchiano; Maša Zorana Ostrogović Sever; Andrey L D Augustynczik; Rüdiger Grote; Ina Kyselová; Annikki Mäkelä; Rasoul Yousefpour; Jan Krejza; Alessio Collalti; Christopher P O Reyer
Journal:  Tree Physiol       Date:  2019-12-01       Impact factor: 4.196

Review 3.  Tackling unresolved questions in forest ecology: The past and future role of simulation models.

Authors:  Isabelle Maréchaux; Fanny Langerwisch; Andreas Huth; Harald Bugmann; Xavier Morin; Christopher P O Reyer; Rupert Seidl; Alessio Collalti; Mateus Dantas de Paula; Rico Fischer; Martin Gutsch; Manfred J Lexer; Heike Lischke; Anja Rammig; Edna Rödig; Boris Sakschewski; Franziska Taubert; Kirsten Thonicke; Giorgio Vacchiano; Friedrich J Bohn
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2021-03-30       Impact factor: 3.167

4.  Constraining size-dependence of vegetation respiration rates.

Authors:  Akihiko Ito
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-03-09       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Spatial variations and controls of carbon use efficiency in China's terrestrial ecosystems.

Authors:  Zhi Chen; Guirui Yu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-12-20       Impact factor: 4.379

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.