Literature DB >> 30924257

Eligibility for anti-fibrotic treatment in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis depends on the predictive equation used for pulmonary function testing.

Andrew Burgess1, Ken Goon1,2, John D Brannan1, John Attia1,3, Kerrin Palazzi3, Christopher Oldmeadow3, Tamera J Corte4,5,6, Ian Glaspole4,7,8, Nicole Goh4,7,9,10, Gregory Keir4,11, Heather Allan4,12, Sally Chapman4,13, Wendy Cooper4,14,15, Samantha Ellis4,16, Peter Hopkins4,17,18, Yuben Moodley4,19, Paul Reynolds4,13, Chris Zappala4,20, Sacha Macansh4,12, Christopher Grainge1,2,3,4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
OBJECTIVE: Publicly funded therapy for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) relies on percentage predicted values from pulmonary function testing, for example Australian patients must have a forced vital capacity ≥50% (%FVC), transfer factor of the lung for carbon monoxide ≥ 30% (%TLco) and forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1 )/FVC ratio > 0.7. Despite defined cut-off values, no jurisdiction prescribes a reference equation for use; multiple equations exist. We hypothesized that access to subsidized treatment varies depending on the chosen equation. The %FVC and %TLco from different commonly used reference equations across general respiratory patients, and IPF-specific patients, were compared.
METHODS: FVC and TLco measurements from a large general respiratory laboratory and the Australian Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis Registry (AIPFR) database were analysed using multiple equations. Differences between %FVC and %TLco for each equation were calculated, with particular interest in classification of patients (%) at the threshold for subsidized treatment.
RESULTS: A total of 20 378 general respiratory database results were analysed. The %FVC ≥ 50% increased from 86% with the Roca equation to 96% with Quanjer (European Coal and Steal Community, ECSC) and %TLco≥30% increased from 91% with Paoletti to 98% with Thompson. However, overall increase in eligibility for subsidized treatment was modest, varying from 48.2% to 49.2%. A total of 545 AIPFR database results were analysed. The %FVC ≥ 50% increased from 73% with Roca to 94% with Quanjer (ECSC) and %TLco≥30% increased from 87% with Paoletti to 96% with Miller. Overall eligibility for subsidized treatment in the AIPFR group varied from 73.6% to 82.8% between surveyed interstitial lung disease (ILD) centres based entirely on the equation used.
CONCLUSION: Substantial variability exists between reference equations, impacting access to subsidized treatment. Treating clinicians should be aware of this when assessing patients around public funding thresholds.
© 2019 Asian Pacific Society of Respirology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  fibrosis; lung function; predicted equations; treatment

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30924257     DOI: 10.1111/resp.13540

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Respirology        ISSN: 1323-7799            Impact factor:   6.424


  2 in total

1.  Antifibrotic Drug Use in Patients with Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis. Data from the IPF-PRO Registry.

Authors:  Margaret L Salisbury; Craig S Conoscenti; Daniel A Culver; Eric Yow; Megan L Neely; Shaun Bender; Nadine Hartmann; Scott M Palmer; Thomas B Leonard
Journal:  Ann Am Thorac Soc       Date:  2020-11

2.  Putting lung function reference equations into context.

Authors:  Brigitte M Borg; Bruce R Thompson
Journal:  Breathe (Sheff)       Date:  2021-09
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.