Literature DB >> 30922756

Late complications after hybrid aortic arch repair.

Hyun-Chel Joo1, Young-Nam Youn2, Joon Ho Kwon3, Jong Yun Won3, Do Yun Lee3, Young-Guk Ko4, Donghoon Choi4, Kyung-Jong Yoo2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Although hybrid arch repair has gained widespread application as an alternative option for high-risk patients, concerns about its long-term durability remain an important issue. The aim of this study was to investigate late complications after hybrid arch repair.
METHODS: From January 2002 to December 2017, hybrid arch repair was performed in 65 patients with aortic arch disease (median age, 66.1 years; range, 41-86 years). Hybrid arch repair was defined as debranching involving at least one supra-aortic vessel bypass and simultaneous or staged endovascular thoracic stent grafting. We retrospectively analyzed late complications including reintervention, open conversion, and aortic-related death. The median follow-up period was 60.1 months (range, 1-170 months).
RESULTS: The in-hospital mortality rate was 6% (4/65). Except for early death (n = 4) and early open conversion (n = 2), late complications were observed in 25 patients (25/59 [42%]). The median time interval between the initial procedure and late complication was 36.6 months (range, 1-92 months). Late complications included delayed type I endoleak (n = 8), distal stent-induced new entry (n = 3), stent migration (n = 3), retrograde type A dissection (n = 2), aortopulmonary fistula (n = 2), aortoesophageal fistula (n = 1), stent fracture (n = 1), infection (n = 1), and sudden death (n = 4). Six of these patients (10%) underwent late open conversion. The overall survival rates at 3 years and 6 years were 71.1 ± 7.4% and 57.2 ± 11.3%, respectively. The aortic event-free rates at 3 years and 6 years were 52.1 ± 7.3% and 39.4 ± 10.3%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Late complications in hybrid arch repair occurred in a substantial proportion of patients during midterm follow-up. Regardless of zone type, the incidence of late complications was relatively high. This study suggests that timely reintervention and open conversion are important for rescuing patients, but repeated reinterventions and conservative strategies are not recommended. Aggressive management and life-long surveillance after hybrid arch repair are mandatory for better outcomes.
Copyright © 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aortic arch; Hybrid arch repair; Late complication

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30922756     DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2019.01.058

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vasc Surg        ISSN: 0741-5214            Impact factor:   4.268


  8 in total

1.  Early and Midterm Outcomes of Type II Hybrid Arch Repair for Complex Aortic Arch Pathology.

Authors:  Yanxiang Liu; Bowen Zhang; Shenghua Liang; Yaojun Dun; Hongwei Guo; Xiangyang Qian; Cuntao Yu; Xiaogang Sun
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-06-02

2.  One minute of circulatory arrest for acute type A aortic dissection --------- a simple operation for acute type A aortic dissection (AAAD).

Authors:  Detian Jiang; Yufeng Huo; Yimin Liu; Yan Wang; Jinfeng Zhou; Xiangfei Sun; Fen Zhao; Yonghai Du; Songxiong He; Chao Liu; Wenyu Sun
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2020-11-12       Impact factor: 1.637

3.  One-stage hybrid procedure for distal aortic arch disease: mid-term experience at a single center.

Authors:  Su-Wei Chen; Yong-Liang Zhong; Zhi-Yu Qiao; Cheng-Nan Li; Yi-Peng Ge; Rui-Dong Qi; Hai-Ou Hu; Li-Zhong Sun; Jun-Ming Zhu
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 2.895

4.  Late Retrograde Aortic Dissection after Hybrid Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair (TEVAR): A Case Report.

Authors:  Safieh Boroumand; Seyed Hossein Ahmadi-Tafti; Saeed Davoodi; Seyed Khalil Forouzannia
Journal:  J Tehran Heart Cent       Date:  2021-01

5.  Safety and durability of single-stage type I hybrid total aortic arch repair for extensive aortic arch disease: early- and long-term clinical outcomes from a single center and our 10-year of experience.

Authors:  Bowen Zhang; Yizhen Wei; Yanxiang Liu; Hao Lin; Shenghua Liang; Yaojun Dun; Cuntao Yu; Xiangyang Qian; Hongwei Guo; Xiaogang Sun
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2021-11       Impact factor: 2.895

6.  Acute thrombotic occlusion of a brachiocephalic branch graft and pseudoaneurysm formation after debranching surgery for a "non-A non-B" aortic dissection.

Authors:  Sara Saltarocchi; Paolo De Orchi; Wael Saade; Mizar D'Abramo; Emmanouela Chourda; Silvia Romiti; Mattia Vinciguerra; Ernesto Greco; Fabio Miraldi; Giuseppe Mazzesi
Journal:  J Card Surg       Date:  2022-06-04       Impact factor: 1.778

Review 7.  Comprehensive review of hybrid aortic arch repair with focus on zone 0 TEVAR and our institutional experience.

Authors:  Saket Singh; Stevan S Pupovac; Roland Assi; Prashanth Vallabhajosyula
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-09-15

8.  Zone 2 hybrid thoracic endovascular aortic repair: Is it a good option for all types of thoracic aortic disease?

Authors:  Bongyeon Sohn; Jae Hang Lee; Joon Chul Jung; Hyoung Woo Chang; Dong Jung Kim; Jun Sung Kim; Cheong Lim; Kay-Hyun Park
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2022-03-25       Impact factor: 1.637

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.