BACKGROUND: Catheter ablation is effective for eliminating most drug-refractory ventricular arrhythmias (VA). However, a major reason for procedural failure is arrhythmia originating deep within the myocardium where it is inaccessible to conventional endocardial or epicardial approaches. Affected patients have limited therapeutic options. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to assess the safety and outcome of a novel radiofrequency ablation catheter that used an extendable/retractable 27-g needle capable of targeting deep arrhythmia (intramural) substrate. METHODS: Patients who failed at least one prior catheter ablation procedure for sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT) or nonsustained VA with associated left ventricular dysfunction were enrolled at 3 centers. The target was sustained monomorphic VT in 26 patients, including 8 with recent VT storm or VT requiring intravenous medication, and 5 with incessant VA associated with ventricular dysfunction. RESULTS: Needle ablation was performed in 31 patients (median of 2 failed prior ablation procedures; 71% nonischemic heart disease). After a median of 15 needle lesions/patient, ablation abolished at least 1 inducible VT in 19 of 26 VT patients (73%), and suppressed ambient arrhythmia in 4 of 5 nonsustained arrhythmia patients. At the 6-month follow-up, 48% of patients were free of recurrent arrhythmia and another 19% were improved. Procedure-related complications included a single pericardial effusion treated with percutaneous drainage and a left ventricular pacing lead dislodgement with no deaths. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with recurrent ventricular arrhythmias refractory to medications and conventional catheter ablation, intramural needle radiofrequency ablation offers significant arrhythmia control with an acceptable procedural risk.
BACKGROUND: Catheter ablation is effective for eliminating most drug-refractory ventricular arrhythmias (VA). However, a major reason for procedural failure is arrhythmia originating deep within the myocardium where it is inaccessible to conventional endocardial or epicardial approaches. Affected patients have limited therapeutic options. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to assess the safety and outcome of a novel radiofrequency ablation catheter that used an extendable/retractable 27-g needle capable of targeting deep arrhythmia (intramural) substrate. METHODS:Patients who failed at least one prior catheter ablation procedure for sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT) or nonsustained VA with associated left ventricular dysfunction were enrolled at 3 centers. The target was sustained monomorphic VT in 26 patients, including 8 with recent VT storm or VT requiring intravenous medication, and 5 with incessant VA associated with ventricular dysfunction. RESULTS: Needle ablation was performed in 31 patients (median of 2 failed prior ablation procedures; 71% nonischemic heart disease). After a median of 15 needle lesions/patient, ablation abolished at least 1 inducible VT in 19 of 26 VTpatients (73%), and suppressed ambient arrhythmia in 4 of 5 nonsustained arrhythmiapatients. At the 6-month follow-up, 48% of patients were free of recurrent arrhythmia and another 19% were improved. Procedure-related complications included a single pericardial effusion treated with percutaneous drainage and a left ventricular pacing lead dislodgement with no deaths. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with recurrent ventricular arrhythmias refractory to medications and conventional catheter ablation, intramural needle radiofrequency ablation offers significant arrhythmia control with an acceptable procedural risk.
Authors: Apoor Patel; Michelle Nsahlai; Thomas Flautt; Akanibo Da-Warikobo; Adi Lador; Carlos Tapias; Diego Rodríguez; Luis Carlos Sáenz; Paul A Schurmann; Amish Dave; Miguel Valderrábano Journal: Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol Date: 2022-08-02
Authors: Eric Sung; Adityo Prakosa; Konstantinos N Aronis; Shijie Zhou; Stefan L Zimmerman; Harikrishna Tandri; Saman Nazarian; Ronald D Berger; Jonathan Chrispin; Natalia A Trayanova Journal: Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol Date: 2020-11-16
Authors: Shijie Zhou; Amir AbdelWahab; B Milan Horáček; Paul J MacInnis; James W Warren; Jason S Davis; Ihab Elsokkari; David C Lee; Ciorsti J MacIntyre; Ratika Parkash; Chris J Gray; Martin J Gardner; Curtis Marcoux; Rajin Choudhury; Natalia A Trayanova; John L Sapp Journal: Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol Date: 2020-06-15
Authors: Shijie Zhou; Eric Sung; Adityo Prakosa; Konstantinos N Aronis; Jonathan Chrispin; Harikrishna Tandri; Amir AbdelWahab; B Milan Horáček; John L Sapp; Natalia A Trayanova Journal: Pacing Clin Electrophysiol Date: 2021-02-12 Impact factor: 1.976
Authors: Babak Nazer; David Giraud; Yan Zhao; James Hodovan; Miriam R Elman; Ahmad Masri; Edward P Gerstenfeld; Jonathan R Lindner Journal: Heart Rhythm Date: 2020-12-29 Impact factor: 6.343