| Literature DB >> 30922311 |
Shuangjian Zheng1, Dongfang Li1, Chunxiang Zhou1,2, Sumei Zhang1, Yayun Wu1, Yankai Chang1, Yuancai Chen1, Jianying Huang1, Changshen Ning1, Gaiping Zhang1, Longxian Zhang3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Cryptosporidium spp. are important zoonotic pathogens infecting a wide range of vertebrate hosts, and causing moderate to severe diarrhea in humans. Cryptosporidium infections are frequently reported in humans and animals worldwide, but little research has been done on local pig breeds such as Tibetan pigs and Yunan Black pigs and imported pig breeds such as Landrace pigs in China. Therefore, a total of 1089 pig fecal samples from four intensive farms in four areas of China, including Tibetan pigs from Gongbujiangda County (n = 180) and Mainling County (n = 434), Tibet, Yunan Black pigs from Sanmenxia, Henan Province (n = 246), and Landrace pigs from Kaifeng, Henan Province (n = 229), and were screened for the presence of Cryptosporidium with microscopy and nested PCR amplification of the small subunit rRNA gene.Entities:
Keywords: China; Cryptosporidium; Pig; Zoonotic
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30922311 PMCID: PMC6438020 DOI: 10.1186/s12917-019-1847-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Vet Res ISSN: 1746-6148 Impact factor: 2.741
Fig. 1Map of sampling locations in China. Tibet is relatively high elevation, while Henan is located on the plains
PCR-based results showed the infection rates and distribution of Cryptosporidium species in pigs of different collection sites, breeds and age groups
| Factors | No. positive/sample size | Prevalence (%) (95% CI) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Collection site | Gongbujiangda County, Tibet | 0/180 | 0 | / |
| Mainling County, Tibet | 3/434 | 0.69 (0–1.47) | ||
| Sanmenxia, Henan | 1/246 | 0.41 (0–1.21) | ||
| Kaifeng, Henan | 19/229 | 8.30 (4.70–11.90) | ||
| Breed | Tibetan pig | 3/614 | 0.49 (0–1.04) | |
| Yunan Black pig | 1/246 | 0.41 (0–1.21) | ||
| Landrace pig | 19/229 | 8.30 (4.70–11.90) | ||
| Age group | < 1 month | 1/467 | 0.21 (0–0.63) | |
| 1–2 months | 21/482 | 4.36 (2.53–6.19) | ||
| > 2 months | 1/140 | 0.71 (0–2.13) | ||
| Total | 23/1089 | 2.11 (1.26–2.97) |
Distribution of Cryptosporidium species/genotypes amongst pigs in China
| Collection site | No. positive/sample size | Prevalence (%) by microscopically or others (95% CI) | No. positive/sample size | Prevalence (%) by PCR (95% CI) | Reference | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Zhejiang | 18/124 | 14.52 (8.23–20.80) | Zou et al. (2017) [ | |||
| Guangdong | 6/72 | 8.33 (1.79–14.87) | Zou et al. (2017) [ | |||
| Yunnan | 46/200 | 23.00 (17.12–28.88) | Zou et al. (2017) [ | |||
| Shaanxi | 44/1337 | 3.29 (2.33–4.25) | Lin et al. (2015) [ | |||
| Heilongjiang | 9/568 | 1.58 (0.55–2.61) | 63/113 | 55.75 (46.45–65.05) | Zhang et al. (2013) [ | |
| Shanghai and Zhejiang, Shaoxing | 79/208 | 37.98 (31.33–44.63) | Yin et al. (2013) [ | |||
| Zhejiang, Shaoxing | 6/24 | 25.00 (6.32–43.68) | Yin et al. (2011) [ | |||
| Shanghai | 10/70 | 14.29 (5.88–22.69) | Yin et al. (2011) [ | |||
| Shanghai | 800/2323 | 34.44 (32.50–36.37) | Chen et al. (2011) [ | |||
| Henan | 111/1350 | 8.22 (6.76–9.69) | 108/1350 | 8.00 (6.55–9.45) | Wang et al. (2010) [ | |
| Total | 920/4241 | 21.69 (20.45–22.93) | 380/3498 | 10.86 (9.83–11.90) |
Distribution of Cryptosporidium species/genotypes amongst pigs worldwide
| Collection site | No. positive/sample size | Prevalence (%) by microscopically or others (95% CI) | No. positive/sample size | Prevalence (%) by PCR (95% CI) | Reference | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Japan | 112/344 | 32.56 (27.58–37.53) | 37/62 | 59.68 (47.12–72.24) | Yui et al. (2014) [ | |
| central Vietnam | 28/193 | 14.51 (9.49–19.52) | 10/14 | 71.43 (44.36–98.50) | Nguyen et al. (2013) [ | |
| Danish | 350/856 | 40.89 (37.59–44.19) | 56/75 | 74.67 (64.59–84.74) | Petersen et al. (2015) [ | |
| Austria | 2/44 | 4.55 (0–10.95) | 8/44 | 18.18 (6.32–30.04) | Němejc et al. (2013) [ | |
| Australia | 45/289 | 15.57 (11.37–19.78) | Johnson et al. (2008) [ | |||
| The Czech Republic | 6/231 | 2.60 (0.53–4.66) | 39/231 | 16.88 (12.02–21.75) | Němejc et al. (2013) [ | |
| The Czech Republic | 194/1620 | 11.98 (10.39–13.56) | 353/1620 | 21.79 (19.78–23.80) | Němejc et al. (2013) [ | |
| The Czech Republica | 0/193 | 0 | 32/193 | 16.58 (11.29–21.87) | Němejc et al. (2012) [ | |
| The Czech Republic | 87/413 | 21.07 (17.12–25.01) | 69/413 | 16.71 (13.09–20.32) | Kváč et al. (2009) [ | |
| The Czech Republic, South Bohemia | 38/144 | 26.39 (19.10–33.67) | 38/144 | 26.39 (19.10–33.67) | Kváč et al. (2009) [ | |
| Poland | 3/129 | 2.33 (0–4.96) | 11/129 | 8.53 (3.64–13.41) | Němejc et al. (2013) [ | |
| The Slovak Republic | 0/56 | 0 | 3/56 | 5.36 (0–11.44) | Němejc et al. (2013) [ | |
| Canada, Prince Edward Island | 163/633 | 25.75 (22.33–29.17) | 113/633 | 17.85 (14.86–20.84) | Buduamoako et al. (2012) [ | |
| Canada, Ontario | 54/122 | 44.26 (35.32–53.20) | 68/122 | 55.74 (46.80–64.68) | Farzan et al. (2011) [ | |
| Spain, Zaragoza | 32/142 | 22.54 (15.58–29.49) | 26/142 | 18.31 (11.87–24.75) | Suárezluengas et al. (2007) [ | |
| Spain, Galicia a | 35/209 | 16.75 (11.64–21.85) | Garcíapresedo et al. (2013) [ | |||
| Total | 1069/5120 | 20.88 (19.77–21.99) | 943/4376 | 21.55 (20.33–22.77) |
aThe samples from these two studies came from wild boars