Literature DB >> 30921978

Radiofrequency Thermoablation of the Gasserian Ganglion Versus the Peripheral Branches of the Trigeminal Nerve for Treatment of Trigeminal Neuralgia: A Randomized, Control Trial.

Neerja Bharti1, John Sujith2, Navneet Singla3, Nidhi B Panda2, Indu Bala1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Trigeminal neuralgia is the most painful condition of facial pain leading to impairment of routine activities. Although radiofrequency thermoablation (RFT) of the Gasserian ganglion is widely used for the treatment of idiopathic trigeminal neuralgia in patients having ineffective pain relief with medical therapy, the incidence of complications like hypoesthesia, neuroparalytic keratitis, and masticatory muscles weakness is high. Recent case reports have shown the effectiveness of RFT of the peripheral branches of the trigeminal nerve for relief of refractory chronic facial pain conditions including trigeminal neuralgia.
OBJECTIVES: This study was conducted to compare the efficacy and safety of RFT of the peripheral branches of the trigeminal nerve with RFT of the Gasserian ganglion for the management of idiopathic trigeminal neuralgia. STUDY
DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, observer-blinded, clinical trial.
SETTING: Tertiary care hospital and medical education and research institute.
METHODS: A total of 40 adult patients of idiopathic trigeminal neuralgia were randomly allocated into 2 groups. The control group received RFT of the Gasserian ganglion while the study group received RFT of the peripheral branches of trigeminal nerve. The procedures were performed in the operation room under all aseptic precautions with fluoroscopic guidance. Post-procedure, the patients were assessed for loss of sensation along the nerve distribution and the adequacy of pain relief on the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS). The patients were followed up for 3 month to assess the quality of pain relief by the NRS and the Barrow Neurological Institute (BNI) pain intensity scale. Improvement in pain was considered excellent if patients had complete pain relief without any medication, good if there was significant reduction in pain (> 50%) with or without medication, and poor if there was less than 50% reduction in pain with medications. Patients were also assessed for numbness and any other side effects. Patients' satisfaction with the procedure was recorded.
RESULTS: Nineteen patients in the control group and 18 in study group had effective pain relief of up to 3 months. Their pain scores were comparable at all time intervals, though the number of patients receiving supplementary medications was more in study group at 2 months (P = 0.015). The patients showed overall satisfaction score of 8.5 (8-9) and 8 (7-9) in control and study groups respectively. The average procedure duration was 30 (30-38) minutes in the control group and 28 (25-40) minutes in the study group. Most of the patients in both groups had mild numbness after the procedure. One patient in the control group had lower eyelid swelling and another had mild weakness of the masseter muscle, which resolved few days later. No major complication was reported in the study group except for 1 patient who reported local ecchymosis. LIMITATIONS: The main limitation of the study is that the patients and the investigator performing the procedure were not blinded, though the person who assessed the patient during follow-up was blinded to the group assignment. Another limitation is that we could not follow up with the patients after 3 months due to time constraints.
CONCLUSION: We found that radiofrequency thermoablation of the peripheral branches of the trigeminal nerve is an effective and safe procedure for the management of idiopathic trigeminal neuralgia. KEY WORDS: Idiopathic trigeminal neuralgia, radiofrequency thermoablation, Gasserian ganglion, peripheral nerve branches, pain, trigeminal nerve.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30921978

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pain Physician        ISSN: 1533-3159            Impact factor:   4.965


  6 in total

Review 1.  [Interdisciplinary position paper: the value of radiofrequency denervation in the treatment of chronic pain].

Authors:  Rudolf Likar; Johann Auer; Albert Chavanne; Wilfried Ilias; Michael Kern; Petra Krepler; Hans-Georg Kress; Ulrike Lischnig; Gernot Maurer; Oliver Sommer; Martin C Spendel; Siegfried Thurnher; Karl Wohak; Andreas Wolf; Michael Wölkhart
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2021-01-14       Impact factor: 1.107

2.  Update on Interventional Management of Neuropathic Pain: A Delphi Consensus of the Spanish Pain Society Neuropathic Pain Task Force.

Authors:  Ancor Serrano-Afonso; Rafael Gálvez; Elena Paramés; Ana Navarro; Dolores Ochoa; Concepción Pérez-Hernández
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2022-04-30       Impact factor: 2.948

3.  Efficacy of Radiofrequency Neurotomy in Chronic Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Rajesh N Janapala; Laxmaiah Manchikanti; Mahendra R Sanapati; Srinivasa Thota; Alaa Abd-Elsayed; Alan D Kaye; Joshua A Hirsch
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2021-09-10       Impact factor: 3.133

4.  Recurrence Rate of Trigeminal Neuralgia With the Use of Percutaneous Stereotactic Continuous Radiofrequency Ablation at 80°C for 90 Seconds: A Single-Center Study.

Authors:  Muhammad Hasan Wasim; Salman A Saleem; Sidra A Naqvi; Muhammad Nafees-Ul Hasan; Naveed Ahmad Durrani; Muhammad Zubair
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-01-20

5.  Percutaneous radiofrequency ablation of peripheral maxillary nerve: Description of new methodology.

Authors:  Jyotsna Punj; Dhruv Jain; Heena Garg; Longjam D Singh
Journal:  Indian J Anaesth       Date:  2022-03-25

6.  Long-term outcomes and predictors of percutaneous radiofrequency thermocoagulation of Gasserian ganglion for maxillary trigeminal neuralgia: a retrospective analysis of 1070 patients with minimum 2-year follow-up.

Authors:  Wenxing Zhao; Liqiang Yang; Ansong Deng; Zongjie Chen; Liangliang He
Journal:  Ann Med       Date:  2022-12       Impact factor: 5.348

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.