André P Boezaart1,2, Alberto Prats-Galino3, Olga C Nin1, Anna Carrera4, José Barberán5,6, José M Escobar7,8, Miguel A Reina8,9. 1. Departments of Anesthesiology. 2. Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, Florida, USA. 3. Laboratory of Surgical Neuro Anatomy, Human Anatomy and Embryology Unit, Faculty of Medicine, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain. 4. Department of Medical Sciences, Universitat de Girona School of Medicine, Girona, Spain. 5. Departments of Internal Medicine. 6. Anesthesiology, Montepríncipe University Hospital, Madrid, Spain. 7. Image Reconstruction Unit, Department of Radiology, Madrid-Montepríncipe University Hospital, Madrid, Spain. 8. School of Medicine, CEU San Pablo University, Madrid, Spain. 9. Department of Anesthesiology, Madrid-Montepríncipe University Hospital, Madrid, Spain.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to study the posterior lumbar epidural space with 3D reconstructions of magnetic resonance images (MRIs) and to compare and validate the findings with targeted anatomic microdissections. DESIGN: We performed 3D reconstructions of high-resolution MRIs from seven patients and normal-resolution MRIs commonly used in clinical practice from 196 other random patients. We then dissected and photographed the lumbar spine areas of four fresh cadavers. RESULTS: From the 3D reconstructions of the MRIs, we verified that the distribution of the posterior fat pad had an irregular shape that resembled a truncated pyramid. It spanned between the superior margin of the lamina of the caudad vertebra and beyond the inferior margin to almost halfway underneath the cephalad lamina of the cranial vertebra, and it was not longitudinally or circumferentially continuous. The 3D reconstructions of the high-definition MRI also consistently revealed a prelaminar fibrous body that was not seen in most of the usually used low-definition MRI reconstructions. Targeted microdissections confirmed the 3D reconstruction findings and also showed the prelaminar tissue body to be fibrous, crossing from side to side anterior to the cephalad half of each lamina, and spanning from the dural sac to the laminae. CONCLUSIONS: Three-dimensional reconstructions and targeted microdissection revealed the unique appearance of posterior fat pads and a prelaminar fibrous body. The exact consistency, presence, prevalence with age, presence in other regions, and function of this body are unknown and require further research.
OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to study the posterior lumbar epidural space with 3D reconstructions of magnetic resonance images (MRIs) and to compare and validate the findings with targeted anatomic microdissections. DESIGN: We performed 3D reconstructions of high-resolution MRIs from seven patients and normal-resolution MRIs commonly used in clinical practice from 196 other random patients. We then dissected and photographed the lumbar spine areas of four fresh cadavers. RESULTS: From the 3D reconstructions of the MRIs, we verified that the distribution of the posterior fat pad had an irregular shape that resembled a truncated pyramid. It spanned between the superior margin of the lamina of the caudad vertebra and beyond the inferior margin to almost halfway underneath the cephalad lamina of the cranial vertebra, and it was not longitudinally or circumferentially continuous. The 3D reconstructions of the high-definition MRI also consistently revealed a prelaminar fibrous body that was not seen in most of the usually used low-definition MRI reconstructions. Targeted microdissections confirmed the 3D reconstruction findings and also showed the prelaminar tissue body to be fibrous, crossing from side to side anterior to the cephalad half of each lamina, and spanning from the dural sac to the laminae. CONCLUSIONS: Three-dimensional reconstructions and targeted microdissection revealed the unique appearance of posterior fat pads and a prelaminar fibrous body. The exact consistency, presence, prevalence with age, presence in other regions, and function of this body are unknown and require further research.
Authors: Arda H Ceylan; Can Özütemiz; Haitao Huang; Christopher Luedemann; Nathan Rubin; David R Nascene Journal: Neuroradiology Date: 2021-08-18 Impact factor: 2.804
Authors: Henning Hermanns; Elke M E Bos; Mark L van Zuylen; Markus W Hollmann; Markus F Stevens Journal: CNS Drugs Date: 2022-07-15 Impact factor: 6.497