Literature DB >> 30921299

Enterovirus D68-Associated Acute Respiratory Illness - New Vaccine Surveillance Network, United States, July-October, 2017 and 2018.

Stephanie A Kujawski, Claire M Midgley, Brian Rha, Joana Y Lively, W Allan Nix, Aaron T Curns, Daniel C Payne, Janet A Englund, Julie A Boom, John V Williams, Geoffrey A Weinberg, Mary A Staat, Rangaraj Selvarangan, Natasha B Halasa, Eileen J Klein, Leila C Sahni, Marian G Michaels, Lynne Shelley, Monica McNeal, Christopher J Harrison, Laura S Stewart, Adriana S Lopez, Janell A Routh, Manisha Patel, M Steven Oberste, John T Watson, Susan I Gerber.   

Abstract

In the fall of 2014, an outbreak of enterovirus D68 (EV-D68)-associated acute respiratory illness (ARI) occurred in the United States (1,2); before 2014, EV-D68 was rarely reported to CDC (2,3). In the United States, reported EV-D68 detections typically peak during late summer and early fall (3). EV-D68 epidemiology is not fully understood because testing in clinical settings seldom has been available and detections are not notifiable to CDC. To better understand EV-D68 epidemiology, CDC recently established active, prospective EV-D68 surveillance among pediatric patients at seven U.S. medical centers through the New Vaccine Surveillance Network (NVSN) (4). This report details a preliminary characterization of EV-D68 testing and detections among emergency department (ED) and hospitalized patients with ARI at all NVSN sites during July 1-October 31, 2017, and the same period in 2018. Among patients with ARI who were tested, EV-D68 was detected in two patients (0.8%) in 2017 and 358 (13.9%) in 2018. Continued active, prospective surveillance of EV-D68-associated ARI is needed to better understand EV-D68 epidemiology in the United States.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30921299      PMCID: PMC6448985          DOI: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6812a1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep        ISSN: 0149-2195            Impact factor:   17.586


In the fall of 2014, an outbreak of enterovirus D68 (EV-D68)–associated acute respiratory illness (ARI) occurred in the United States (,); before 2014, EV-D68 was rarely reported to CDC (,). In the United States, reported EV-D68 detections typically peak during late summer and early fall (). EV-D68 epidemiology is not fully understood because testing in clinical settings seldom has been available and detections are not notifiable to CDC. To better understand EV-D68 epidemiology, CDC recently established active, prospective EV-D68 surveillance among pediatric patients at seven U.S. medical centers through the New Vaccine Surveillance Network (NVSN) (). This report details a preliminary characterization of EV-D68 testing and detections among emergency department (ED) and hospitalized patients with ARI at all NVSN sites during July 1–October 31, 2017, and the same period in 2018. Among patients with ARI who were tested, EV-D68 was detected in two patients (0.8%) in 2017 and 358 (13.9%) in 2018. Continued active, prospective surveillance of EV-D68–associated ARI is needed to better understand EV-D68 epidemiology in the United States. NVSN conducts active, prospective, population-based surveillance for ARI* among children and teens aged <18 years at seven U.S. medical centers at Cincinnati, Ohio; Houston, Texas; Kansas City, Missouri; Nashville, Tennessee; Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; Rochester, New York; and Seattle, Washington (). Respiratory specimens (mid-turbinate nasal, oropharyngeal swabs, or both) from patients with ARI were tested at each site for EV-D68 using a validated real-time reverse transcription–polymerase chain reaction assay. Two NVSN sites (Nashville and Pittsburgh) tested all ARI specimens for EV-D68 directly. Five sites (Cincinnati, Houston, Kansas City, Rochester, and Seattle) used a two-step algorithm, wherein all ARI specimens were first tested for enterovirus/rhinovirus (EV/RV) using molecular diagnostic assays approved by the Food and Drug Administration or CDC; all EV-positive or RV-positive specimens were subsequently tested for EV-D68. Demographic and admission status information were collected from medical charts. EV-D68 detections were analyzed by year, month, site, admission status, and patient sex and age. Based on preliminary data, test results were positive for EV-D68 for two (0.08%) of 2,433 patients with ARI who were tested during 2017 and 358 (13.9%) of 2,579 tested during 2018. In 2017, one patient whose test result was positive for EV-D68 was hospitalized in Houston, and one was evaluated in the ED in Rochester. In 2018, patients with EV-D68-positive test results were identified at all seven sites, and 242 of 358 patients (67.6%) were hospitalized (range by site = 53.3%–76.8%) (Table). EV-D68 was detected in 9.2% of patients with ED visits for ARI and 18.3% of hospitalized patients with ARI. Approximately half (169; 47.2%) of the 2018 EV-D68 detections occurred in September (Figure). The peak of detections varied by site, with Cincinnati and Kansas City peaking in late August through September; Houston, Pittsburgh, and Rochester in mid-September; and Nashville and Seattle in October. The median age of patients testing positive for EV-D68 was 3 years (range = 1 month–17 years; interquartile range = 1.5–5 years), and 211 (58.9%) were male. Among 42 EV-D68–positive specimens from 2018 sequenced at CDC, all were lineage B3.
TABLE

Number of patients with acute respiratory illness (ARI) who were tested and received results positive for EV-D68, by admission status and network surveillance site — New Vaccine Surveillance Network (NVSN), United States, July 1–October 31, 2018

Admission status/NVSN siteNo. of ARI patients testedNo. (%) of EV/RV-positive patientsEV-D68-positive patients
No. of patients% Among EV/RV-positive patients% Among ARI patients tested
Emergency department visit
Cincinnati
148
40 (27.0)
13
32.5
8.8
Houston
157
58 (36.9)
9
15.5
5.7
Kansas City
306
163 (53.3)
21
12.9
6.9
Nashville
282
N/A
21
N/A
7.4
Pittsburgh
198
N/A
25
N/A
12.6
Rochester
61
34 (55.7)
18
52.9
29.5
Seattle
104
73 (70.2)
9
12.3
8.7
All sites
1,256
368 (47.4)*
116
19.0
9.2
Inpatient
Cincinnati
235
102 (43.4)
43
42.2
18.3
Houston
220
62 (28.2)
16
25.8
7.3
Kansas City
139
92 (66.2)
33
35.9
23.7
Nashville
202
N/A
24
N/A
11.9
Pittsburgh
269
N/A
70
N/A
26.0
Rochester
161
108 (67.1)
45
41.7
28.0
Seattle
97
58 (59.8)
11
19.0
11.3
All sites
1,323
422 (49.5)*
242
35.1
18.3
Total 2,579 790 (48.5)* 358 27.6 13.9

Abbreviations: EV = enterovirus; N/A = not applicable; RV = rhinovirus.

* These percentages only include ARI patients at sites that first tested for EV/RV (Cincinnati, Houston, Kansas City, Seattle, and Rochester). For comparison, in 2017, a total of 715 of 1,714 (41.7%) ARI patients first tested positive for EV/RV.

† These percentages only include EV-D68-positive patients at sites that first tested for EV/RV (Cincinnati, Houston, Kansas City, Seattle, and Rochester. For comparison, in 2017, two of 715 (0.3%) EV/RV-positive patients tested positive for EV-D68.

FIGURE

Enterovirus-D68 (EV-D68) detections, by date of specimen collection and surveillance network site (N = 358) — New Vaccine Surveillance Network, United States, July 1—October 31, 2018

Abbreviations: EV = enterovirus; N/A = not applicable; RV = rhinovirus. * These percentages only include ARI patients at sites that first tested for EV/RV (Cincinnati, Houston, Kansas City, Seattle, and Rochester). For comparison, in 2017, a total of 715 of 1,714 (41.7%) ARI patients first tested positive for EV/RV. † These percentages only include EV-D68-positive patients at sites that first tested for EV/RV (Cincinnati, Houston, Kansas City, Seattle, and Rochester. For comparison, in 2017, two of 715 (0.3%) EV/RV-positive patients tested positive for EV-D68. Enterovirus-D68 (EV-D68) detections, by date of specimen collection and surveillance network site (N = 358) — New Vaccine Surveillance Network, United States, July 1—October 31, 2018

Discussion

During 2018, ARI surveillance through NVSN detected EV-D68 at levels substantially higher than those during the same period in 2017. European countries also reported EV-D68 activity in 2018 (,). Although EV-D68 infection more commonly causes respiratory illness, previous investigations have suggested that EV-D68 might also be associated with acute flaccid myelitis (AFM), a rare neurologic condition characterized by acute flaccid limb weakness (,). Contemporaneous with the 2014 outbreak of EV-D68 associated with respiratory illness, CDC received increased reports of AFM, supporting a temporal association between EV-D68 and AFM (). Since 2015, CDC has conducted surveillance for AFM in the United States using a standardized case definition (). As of March 1, 2019, CDC has confirmed 223 AFM cases in 2018, with peak onset of limb weakness in September 2018; in 2017, CDC confirmed 35 cases (,). Although AFM is rare in the United States, these AFM surveillance data, along with the EV-D68 activity documented through NVSN, provide additional supporting evidence for a temporal association between EV-D68 respiratory illness and AFM. CDC, in collaboration with clinical and public health partners, continues to investigate the relationship between AFM and enteroviruses, including EV-D68. The findings in this report are subject to at least two limitations. First, this report describes EV-D68 testing within NVSN during July–October of each year, but additional cases likely occurred outside this period in 2018. Therefore, the results might not be representative of the entire EV-D68 season. Second, NVSN sentinel surveillance sites are geographically varied, but might not be representative of all regions of the United States. Through recently established active, prospective, ARI surveillance in NVSN, EV-D68 was detected in 0.8% of patients tested in 2017 and 13.9% in 2018. Continued surveillance for EV-D68–associated ARI is needed to better understand the epidemiology of EV-D68 in the United States.

What is already known about this topic?

A nationwide outbreak of enterovirus D68 (EV-D68), which is associated with acute respiratory illness (ARI), occurred in 2014. EV-D68 epidemiology is not fully understood because testing in clinical settings is limited and detections are not notifiable to CDC.

What is added by this report?

Based on active, prospective surveillance of ARI through the New Vaccine Surveillance Network, EV-D68 was detected in two (0.8%) patients in 2017 and 358 (13.9%) in 2018. Detections in 2018 peaked in September.

What are the implications for public health practice?

Continued active, prospective surveillance is needed to better understand trends in EV-D68 circulation.
  18 in total

1.  Biennial Upsurge and Molecular Epidemiology of Enterovirus D68 Infection in New York, USA, 2014 to 2018.

Authors:  Victoria L Gilrane; Jian Zhuge; Weihua Huang; Sheila M Nolan; Abhay Dhand; Changhong Yin; Christian Salib; Faariah Shakil; Helen Engel; John T Fallon; Guiqing Wang
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2020-08-24       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Development of Novel PCR Assays for Improved Detection of Enterovirus D68.

Authors:  Tatsuki Ikuse; Yuta Aizawa; Hayato Takihara; Shujiro Okuda; Kanako Watanabe; Akihiko Saitoh
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2021-08-25       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Evolution, geographic spreading, and demographic distribution of Enterovirus D68.

Authors:  Emma B Hodcroft; Robert Dyrdak; Cristina Andrés; Adrian Egli; Josiane Reist; Diego García Martínez de Artola; Julia Alcoba-Flórez; Hubert G M Niesters; Andrés Antón; Randy Poelman; Marijke Reynders; Elke Wollants; Richard A Neher; Jan Albert
Journal:  PLoS Pathog       Date:  2022-05-31       Impact factor: 7.464

4.  Association of Enterovirus D68 with Acute Flaccid Myelitis, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA, 2009-2018.

Authors:  Priyanka Uprety; Darcy Curtis; Michael Elkan; Jeffrey Fink; Ramakrishnan Rajagopalan; Chunyu Zhao; Kyle Bittinger; Stephanie Mitchell; Erlinda R Ulloa; Sarah Hopkins; Erin H Graf
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2019-09-17       Impact factor: 6.883

Review 5.  Understanding Enterovirus D68-Induced Neurologic Disease: A Basic Science Review.

Authors:  Alison M Hixon; Joshua Frost; Michael J Rudy; Kevin Messacar; Penny Clarke; Kenneth L Tyler
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2019-09-04       Impact factor: 5.048

Review 6.  Current Understanding of Human Enterovirus D68.

Authors:  Jing Sun; Xiao-Yi Hu; Xiao-Fang Yu
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2019-05-29       Impact factor: 5.048

7.  A ten-year retrospective evaluation of acute flaccid myelitis at 5 pediatric centers in the United States, 2005-2014.

Authors:  Margaret M Cortese; Anita K Kambhampati; Jennifer E Schuster; Zaid Alhinai; Gary R Nelson; Gloria J Guzman Perez-Carrillo; Arastoo Vossough; Michael A Smit; Robert C McKinstry; Timothy Zinkus; Kevin R Moore; Jeffrey M Rogg; Meghan S Candee; James J Sejvar; Sarah E Hopkins
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-02-13       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Nearly Complete Genome Sequences of 17 Enterovirus D68 Strains from Kansas City, Missouri, 2018.

Authors:  Suman B Pakala; Yi Tan; Ferdaus Hassan; Annie Mai; Robert H Markowitz; Meghan H Shilts; Seesandra V Rajagopala; Rangaraj Selvarangan; Suman R Das
Journal:  Microbiol Resour Announc       Date:  2019-11-07

9.  Human antibodies neutralize enterovirus D68 and protect against infection and paralytic disease.

Authors:  Matthew R Vogt; Jianing Fu; Nurgun Kose; Lauren E Williamson; Robin Bombardi; Ian Setliff; Ivelin S Georgiev; Thomas Klose; Michael G Rossmann; Yury A Bochkov; James E Gern; Richard J Kuhn; James E Crowe
Journal:  Sci Immunol       Date:  2020-07-03

10.  Characteristics of Patients with Acute Flaccid Myelitis, United States, 2015-2018.

Authors:  Nilay McLaren; Adriana Lopez; Sarah Kidd; John X Zhang; W Allan Nix; Ruth Link-Gelles; Adria Lee; Janell A Routh
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 6.883

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.