BACKGROUND: Hypertension in midlife has been associated with increased risk of stroke and neurocognitive decline. Few studies, however, have examined neurocognition among individuals with treatment-resistant hypertension or potential mechanisms by which treatment-resistant hypertension may impair neurocognition. METHODS: We examined the pattern of neurocognitive impairment and potential mechanisms in a sample of 96 overweight adults with treatment-resistant hypertension, aged 41-81 years. Neurocognitive function was assessed using a 45-min test battery consisting of executive function and memory. Vascular and metabolic mechanisms examined included cerebrovascular risk factors (CVRFs: Framingham Stroke Risk Profile), insulin sensitivity (homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance), waist-to-hip ratio, microvascular function (hyperemic response), and peak oxygen consumption from an exercise treadmill test. Simple path analyses were used to assess the association between potential vascular and metabolic mechanisms and neurocognition. RESULTS: Neurocognitive impairments were common, with 70% of the sample exhibiting impaired performance on at least one executive function subtest and 38% on at least one measure of memory. Higher levels of aerobic fitness, greater insulin sensitivity, and better microvascular function, as well as lower CVRFs and waist-to-hip ratio were associated with better neurocognition. In path analyses, aerobic fitness, microvascular function, and CVRFs all were independently associated with neurocognitive performance. Insulin resistance associated with worse executive function but better memory performance among older participants. CONCLUSION: Neurocognitive impairments are common in adults with treatment-resistant hypertension, particularly on tests of executive function. Better neurocognition is independently associated with aerobic fitness, microvascular function, and CVRFs.
BACKGROUND:Hypertension in midlife has been associated with increased risk of stroke and neurocognitive decline. Few studies, however, have examined neurocognition among individuals with treatment-resistant hypertension or potential mechanisms by which treatment-resistant hypertension may impair neurocognition. METHODS: We examined the pattern of neurocognitive impairment and potential mechanisms in a sample of 96 overweight adults with treatment-resistant hypertension, aged 41-81 years. Neurocognitive function was assessed using a 45-min test battery consisting of executive function and memory. Vascular and metabolic mechanisms examined included cerebrovascular risk factors (CVRFs: Framingham Stroke Risk Profile), insulin sensitivity (homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance), waist-to-hip ratio, microvascular function (hyperemic response), and peak oxygen consumption from an exercise treadmill test. Simple path analyses were used to assess the association between potential vascular and metabolic mechanisms and neurocognition. RESULTS:Neurocognitive impairments were common, with 70% of the sample exhibiting impaired performance on at least one executive function subtest and 38% on at least one measure of memory. Higher levels of aerobic fitness, greater insulin sensitivity, and better microvascular function, as well as lower CVRFs and waist-to-hip ratio were associated with better neurocognition. In path analyses, aerobic fitness, microvascular function, and CVRFs all were independently associated with neurocognitive performance. Insulin resistance associated with worse executive function but better memory performance among older participants. CONCLUSION:Neurocognitive impairments are common in adults with treatment-resistant hypertension, particularly on tests of executive function. Better neurocognition is independently associated with aerobic fitness, microvascular function, and CVRFs.
Authors: Carole Dufouil; Alexa Beiser; Leslie A McLure; Philip A Wolf; Christophe Tzourio; Virginia J Howard; Andrew J Westwood; Jayandra J Himali; Lisa Sullivan; Hugo J Aparicio; Margaret Kelly-Hayes; Karen Ritchie; Carlos S Kase; Aleksandra Pikula; Jose R Romero; Ralph B D'Agostino; Cécilia Samieri; Ramachandran S Vasan; Genevieve Chêne; George Howard; Sudha Seshadri Journal: Circulation Date: 2017-02-03 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Jeffrey M Burns; Robyn A Honea; Eric D Vidoni; Lewis J Hutfles; William M Brooks; Russell H Swerdlow Journal: Biochim Biophys Acta Date: 2011-07-01
Authors: Y-F Chuang; Y An; M Bilgel; D F Wong; J C Troncoso; R J O'Brien; J C Breitner; L Ferruci; S M Resnick; M Thambisetty Journal: Mol Psychiatry Date: 2015-09-01 Impact factor: 15.992
Authors: Patrick J Smith; Andrew Sherwood; Alan L Hinderliter; Stephanie Mabe; Lana L Watkins; Linda Craighead; Krista Ingle; Crystal Tyson; Forgive Avorgbedor; Pao-Hwa Lin; William E Kraus; Lawrence Liao; James A Blumenthal Journal: J Hypertens Date: 2022-06-10 Impact factor: 4.776