Literature DB >> 30920449

Fostering Student-Faculty Partnerships for Continuous Curricular Improvement in Undergraduate Medical Education.

Kirstin W Scott1, Dana G Callahan, Jie Jane Chen, Marissa H Lynn, David J Cote, Anna Morenz, Josephine Fisher, Varnel L Antoine, Elizabeth R Lemoine, Shaunak K Bakshi, Jessie Stuart, Edward M Hundert, Bernard S Chang, Holly Gooding.   

Abstract

PROBLEM: A number of medical schools have used curricular reform as an opportunity to formalize student involvement in medical education, but there are few published assessments of these programs. Formal evaluation of a program's acceptability and use is essential for determining its potential for sustainability and generalizability. APPROACH: Harvard Medical School's Education Representatives (Ed Reps) program was created in 2015 to launch alongside a new curriculum. The program aimed to foster partnerships between faculty and students for continuous and real-time curricular improvement. Ed Reps, course directors, and core faculty met regularly to convey bidirectional feedback to optimize the learning environment in real time. OUTCOMES: A survey to assess the program's impact was sent to students and faculty. The majority of students (202/222; 91.0%) reported Ed Reps had a positive impact on the curriculum. Among faculty, 35/37 (94.6%) reported making changes to their courses as a result of Ed Reps feedback, and 34/37 (91.9%) agreed the program had a positive impact on the learning environment. Qualitative feedback from students and faculty demonstrated a change in school culture, reflecting the primary goals of partnership and continuous quality improvement (CQI). NEXT STEPS: This student-faculty partnership demonstrated high rates of awareness, use, and satisfaction among faculty and students, suggesting its potential for local sustainability and implementation at other schools seeking to formalize student engagement in CQI. Next steps include ensuring the feedback provided is representative of the student body and identifying new areas for student CQI input as the curriculum becomes more established.

Year:  2019        PMID: 30920449     DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000002726

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Med        ISSN: 1040-2446            Impact factor:   6.893


  7 in total

1.  Aligning Student-Faculty Mentorship Expectations and Needs to Promote Professional Identity Formation in Undergraduate Medical Education.

Authors:  Jonathan J Kusner; Jie Jane Chen; Fidencio Saldaña; Jennifer Potter
Journal:  J Med Educ Curric Dev       Date:  2022-05-11

2.  Rapid Feedback: Assessing Pre-clinical Teaching in the Era of Online Learning.

Authors:  Daniel Walden; Meagan Rawls; Sally A Santen; Moshe Feldman; Anna Vinnikova; Alan Dow
Journal:  Med Sci Educ       Date:  2022-06-15

3.  Understanding and Optimizing Group Dynamics in Case-Based Collaborative Learning.

Authors:  Michael Kochis; Daniel Kamin; Barbara Cockrill; Henrike Besche
Journal:  Med Sci Educ       Date:  2021-09-02

4.  Perceptions and preparedness toward tobacco cessation counseling amongst clinical medical students in Chongqing, Southwest China: A cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Chuang Yang; Wenjin He; Ruihang Deng; Mohan Giri; Haiyun Dai
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2022-08-01

5.  Relationship between students' perceptions of the adequacy of M1 and M2 curricula and their performance on USMLE step 1 examination.

Authors:  Mohammed K Khalil; William S Wright; Kelsey A Spearman; Amber C Gaspard
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2019-09-14       Impact factor: 2.463

6.  Reinventing Undergraduate Clinical Placements with a Switch to Delivery by Clinical Teaching Fellows: A Medical Student's Perspective [Letter].

Authors:  George Ratcliffe; Nicole George
Journal:  Adv Med Educ Pract       Date:  2022-01-27

7.  Medical Student Mobilization During a Crisis: Lessons From a COVID-19 Medical Student Response Team.

Authors:  Derek Soled; Shivangi Goel; Danika Barry; Parsa Erfani; Nicholos Joseph; Michael Kochis; Nishant Uppal; David Velasquez; Kruti Vora; Kirstin Woody Scott
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2020-09       Impact factor: 7.840

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.